Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 Richard J. Hobbs, Anke Jentsch, <strong>and</strong> Vicky M. Temperton<br />
Conceptual tool box<br />
Disturbance<br />
<strong>Succession</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong><br />
Assembly<br />
Figure 7.3 Ideally, concepts from succession, assembly, <strong>and</strong> disturbance should be<br />
combined synergistically to produce a useful body of ideas which have direct relevance<br />
to restoration practice.<br />
histories present <strong>and</strong> the occurrence of species adapted to the disturbance—<strong>and</strong><br />
hence which species are available for community assembly <strong>and</strong> successional<br />
dynamics.<br />
We list a series of considerations that arise from the above discussions which<br />
relate to the practicalities of restoration. They include considerations of historical<br />
precedence, continuous versus discrete processes, self-sustainable dynamics,<br />
thresholds, restoration goals <strong>and</strong> alternative states, scaling issues, spatial<br />
mosaics, nonlinear dynamics, inertia, <strong>and</strong> underlying processes for management<br />
action.<br />
1. Precedence. Historical contingency (White <strong>and</strong> Jentsch 2001) needs to<br />
be taken into account in restoration management. Only those species that<br />
have access to the site <strong>and</strong> traits to pass the disturbance filter (in addition<br />
to the traits needed to pass other biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotic filters) can participate in<br />
recovery <strong>and</strong> assembly. Thus, historical precedence <strong>and</strong> the regional species<br />
pool determine the diversity of functional responses within a restoration<br />
site.<br />
2. Continuous <strong>and</strong> discrete processes. In essence, the interaction of continuous<br />
<strong>and</strong> discrete processes drives successional dynamics. Thus, the interaction<br />
of continuous <strong>and</strong> discrete processes implies gradual accumulation as well<br />
as sudden change in resources, <strong>and</strong> defines options of human intervention<br />
in restoration. Patterns of seasonality <strong>and</strong> their suddenness add to the complexity<br />
of successional rhythms in various restoration sites. These seasonal<br />
patterns define, or at least interact with, the temporal rhythm of discrete<br />
events (disturbances) <strong>and</strong> continuous processes (e.g., growth, community<br />
assembly, <strong>and</strong> regeneration). These patterns thereby define the appropriate<br />
timing for management action.<br />
3. Self-sustainable dynamics. No matter where restoration projects try to apply<br />
successional theory, the primary goal of restoration is to apply knowledge<br />
about the conditions that establish self-sustaining dynamics (or autogenic<br />
processes) within a particular ecosystem. In restoration practice, this knowledge<br />
may define thresholds in the above-mentioned continuous processes,<br />
such as increasing resource availability, where competitive balance of interacting<br />
species is altered, or in discrete events, such as repeated droughts,<br />
where composition of communities is altered. Continuous processes such