21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 Richard J. Hobbs, Anke Jentsch, <strong>and</strong> Vicky M. Temperton<br />

Conceptual tool box<br />

Disturbance<br />

<strong>Succession</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong><br />

Assembly<br />

Figure 7.3 Ideally, concepts from succession, assembly, <strong>and</strong> disturbance should be<br />

combined synergistically to produce a useful body of ideas which have direct relevance<br />

to restoration practice.<br />

histories present <strong>and</strong> the occurrence of species adapted to the disturbance—<strong>and</strong><br />

hence which species are available for community assembly <strong>and</strong> successional<br />

dynamics.<br />

We list a series of considerations that arise from the above discussions which<br />

relate to the practicalities of restoration. They include considerations of historical<br />

precedence, continuous versus discrete processes, self-sustainable dynamics,<br />

thresholds, restoration goals <strong>and</strong> alternative states, scaling issues, spatial<br />

mosaics, nonlinear dynamics, inertia, <strong>and</strong> underlying processes for management<br />

action.<br />

1. Precedence. Historical contingency (White <strong>and</strong> Jentsch 2001) needs to<br />

be taken into account in restoration management. Only those species that<br />

have access to the site <strong>and</strong> traits to pass the disturbance filter (in addition<br />

to the traits needed to pass other biotic <strong>and</strong> abiotic filters) can participate in<br />

recovery <strong>and</strong> assembly. Thus, historical precedence <strong>and</strong> the regional species<br />

pool determine the diversity of functional responses within a restoration<br />

site.<br />

2. Continuous <strong>and</strong> discrete processes. In essence, the interaction of continuous<br />

<strong>and</strong> discrete processes drives successional dynamics. Thus, the interaction<br />

of continuous <strong>and</strong> discrete processes implies gradual accumulation as well<br />

as sudden change in resources, <strong>and</strong> defines options of human intervention<br />

in restoration. Patterns of seasonality <strong>and</strong> their suddenness add to the complexity<br />

of successional rhythms in various restoration sites. These seasonal<br />

patterns define, or at least interact with, the temporal rhythm of discrete<br />

events (disturbances) <strong>and</strong> continuous processes (e.g., growth, community<br />

assembly, <strong>and</strong> regeneration). These patterns thereby define the appropriate<br />

timing for management action.<br />

3. Self-sustainable dynamics. No matter where restoration projects try to apply<br />

successional theory, the primary goal of restoration is to apply knowledge<br />

about the conditions that establish self-sustaining dynamics (or autogenic<br />

processes) within a particular ecosystem. In restoration practice, this knowledge<br />

may define thresholds in the above-mentioned continuous processes,<br />

such as increasing resource availability, where competitive balance of interacting<br />

species is altered, or in discrete events, such as repeated droughts,<br />

where composition of communities is altered. Continuous processes such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!