21.12.2012 Views

Thermal Food Processing

Thermal Food Processing

Thermal Food Processing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 <strong>Thermal</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Processing</strong>: New Technologies and Quality Issues<br />

Temperature (°C)<br />

150<br />

120<br />

65<br />

10<br />

Retort<br />

Time (min)<br />

Product center<br />

0 25 50 75 100 125 150<br />

FIGURE 3.7 Computer-generated plot of retort temperature, can center temperature, and<br />

accomplished lethality (F o) over time for thermal processing of a conduction-heated food.<br />

(From Datta, A.K. et al., J. <strong>Food</strong> Sci., 51, 480–483, 507, 1986. With permission.)<br />

processing these signals through the computer. Through programming instructions,<br />

both retort temperature and product center temperature are plotted against<br />

time without any data transformation. This allows the operator to see what has<br />

actually happened throughout the duration of the process test. As the data are<br />

being read by the computer, additional programming instructions call for calculation<br />

of the incremental process lethality (∆F i) at each time interval between<br />

temperature readings and summing these over time as the process is under way.<br />

As a result, the accumulated lethality (F) is known at any time during the process<br />

and can be plotted on the graph, along with the temperature histories, to show<br />

the final value reached at the end of the process.<br />

An example of the computer printout from such a heat penetration test is<br />

shown in Figure 3.7. Another test can be repeated quickly for a longer or shorter<br />

process time, with instant results on the F o achieved. By examining the results<br />

from both tests, the desired process time for the target F value can be closely<br />

estimated and then quickly tested for confirmation. The results of two such heat<br />

penetration tests are shown superimposed on each other in Figure 3.8. These<br />

results show that test 1, with a process time of 68 min, produced an F value of<br />

6, and test 2, with a process time of 80 min, produced an F value of 8, suggesting<br />

that a target F value of 7 will be achieved by an intermediate process time. This<br />

can be confirmed by running a test at the suggested process time, and examining<br />

the resulting F value.<br />

F o<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Accomplished F o (min)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!