21.12.2012 Views

Thermal Food Processing

Thermal Food Processing

Thermal Food Processing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thermal</strong> <strong>Processing</strong> of Poultry Products 223<br />

Bartlett and Hawke 121 evaluated the heat resistance of L. monocytogenes<br />

strains Scott A (a clinical isolate) and HAL 975E1 (an egg isolate) in the following<br />

five liquid egg products: liquid whole egg (LWE), 10% NaCl whole egg (LWEN),<br />

10% sucrose whole egg (LWES), 10% NaCl egg yolk (EYN), and 10% sucrose<br />

egg yolk (EYS). The presence of salt decreased the water activity (a w) of the<br />

products to a greater extent than sucrose; all water activity values were >0.91<br />

except for salt yolk (a w = 0.867). Survivor curves were constructed and D values<br />

calculated based on data from a 0.2-ml submerged sealed test tube procedure.<br />

The relative heat resistance of L. monocytogenes in the five products was as<br />

follows: heat resistance in salted egg yolk > salted liquid whole egg >> sucrose<br />

egg yolk ≥ sucrose liquid whole egg ≥ liquid whole egg. These thermal resistance<br />

trends were very similar to those reported by Cotterill et al. 97 for S. Oranienburg<br />

in liquid egg products. Based on current U.S. conventional egg pasteurization<br />

requirements, Bartlett and Hawke 121 predicted that process lethalities against L.<br />

monocytogenes Scott A would range from 0.2 log cycle (for salt egg yolk) to 1.8<br />

log cycles (for sucrose LWE). Similar thermal resistance trends were reported by<br />

Palumbo et al., 71 who determined D values for six pooled strains of Salmonella<br />

spp. and for five pooled strains of L. monocytogenes inoculated in plain liquid<br />

egg yolk (EY) and in various EY products containing added salt or added sucrose.<br />

Both pathogens were more heat resistant in EY + 10% NaCl than in EY + 10%<br />

sucrose or in plain EY. Based on D values derived by using a submerged capped<br />

test tube procedure, the lethality of USDA-mandated conventional egg pasteurization<br />

processes was estimated to range from 0.3 log cycle (in EY + 10% NaC1)<br />

to 6.1 log cycles (in plain EY) for Salmonella spp., and from 0.2 log cycle (in<br />

EY + 10% NaCl) to 3.3 log cycles (in EY + 10% sucrose) for L. monocytogenes. 71<br />

In summary, the above four publications indicate that the margin of safety<br />

provided by conventional pasteurization requirements for LWE, plain yolk, and<br />

products containing added sucrose is not large, especially if L. monocytogenes is<br />

present in the raw bulk tank at levels of >100 CFU/ml. In NaCl-supplemented<br />

LWE or yolk, conventional pasteurization would be inadequate to inactivate even<br />

10 CFU/ml of L. monocytogenes. These findings take on additional significance<br />

in light of a recent USDA document that details the criteria for approval to produce<br />

and market liquid egg products with an extended shelf life (i.e., >4 weeks at<br />

4.4°C). 122 In order to gain regulatory approval to produce such products, companies<br />

must pasteurize the product at 60°C for 3.5 min. If alternative thermal<br />

processes are used, the company must provide laboratory data demonstrating that<br />

the thermal process yields a 7 log reduction in the viable L. monocytogenes<br />

population. As noted previously, the data of Foegeding and Leasor 80 and Bartlett<br />

and Hawke 121 clearly demonstrate that a 3.5-min process at 60°C represents only<br />

a 1.7- to 2.7-D Listeria inactivation process. Thus, the proposed 7-D lethality<br />

requirement appears to be unduly harsh and may not permit production of liquid<br />

egg products of acceptable organoleptic and functional quality. At the time of<br />

this review, no studies documenting the thermal resistance of Listeria spp. in<br />

liquid egg white or in liquid egg substitutes were available in the published<br />

scientific literature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!