06.12.2021 Views

RBU_JR_LIS_V23_2021-FULL_TEXT-E-Copy

The RBU Journal of Library & Information science is a scholarly communication for education, research and development of the Library & Information science field. It is published annually. The first volume was published in 1997. It received ISSN (0972-2750) in the 5th volume in the year 2001. From 17th Volume published in the year 2015, the journal becomes peer-reviewed by eminent experts across the country. This journal WAS enlisted by UGC approved List of Journal in 2017, With Serial No. 351 and Journal NO. 45237. Since 2019, this Journal Qualified as per analysis protocol as Group D Journal and listed under UGC CARE approved list of Journals.

The RBU Journal of Library & Information science is a scholarly communication for education, research and development of the Library & Information science field. It is published annually. The first volume was published in 1997. It received ISSN (0972-2750) in the 5th volume in the year 2001. From 17th Volume published in the year 2015, the journal becomes peer-reviewed by eminent experts across the country. This journal WAS enlisted by UGC approved List of Journal in 2017, With Serial No. 351 and Journal NO. 45237.
Since 2019, this Journal Qualified as per analysis protocol as Group D Journal and listed under UGC CARE approved list of Journals.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RBU Journal of library & Information Science, V. 23, 2021

discoverability or helps determine suitability or

accessibility of a resource.

2.4 Australian Government Locator Service

(AGLS)

Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS) metadata

standard is an Australian standard for cross-domain

resource description, consisting of nineteen elements

(National Archives of Australia, 2021). AGLS is also

based on the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set with 4

additional elements to describe the resources more

effectively. It contains different element qualifiers to

facilitate it to describe more categories of resources.

AGLS, which is interoperable and is entirely compatible

with the Dublin Core metadata element set. In order to

have resource compliance with AGLS standard, five

metadata elements such as creator, title, date, identifier

OR availability, subject OR function must be present.

The 'identifier' field is mandatory if the resource is in

online mode and 'availability' field is mandatory if the

resource is available only in offline mode. AGLS requires

'publisher' element to describe the information resources,

except for transactional services. All other elements are

optional, and all elements are repeatable (Abideen P. S.,

2011).

2.4 Indian Scenario

The Government of India also has taken initiatives in

metadata standardisation in India. The first working group

meeting constituted for ‘metadata and data standards for e-

Governance application domains’, was held in the

Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC),

Bangalore in June 2006.

Over a period of time, the Government of India has

notified domain-specific e-Governance related metadata

standards (e-Governance Standards Division, Govt. of

India, 2021).

Prominent among them include:

Metadata and Data Standards for Health Domain

Metadata and Data Standards for Panchayati Raj

Metadata and Data Standards for Rural Drinking

Water and Sanitation

Demographic Metadata and Data Standards

Biometrics Standards for Face image data,

Fingerprint image data and Iris image data.

Based on the study undertaken on the globally accepted e-

Government metadata standards, Abideen P. S., (2013)

proposed a model metadata framework for India, namely

Indian e-Governance Metadata Set Model (I-GMS)

'consisting of 18 elements with four mandatory fields such

as Creator, Date, Title, Subject, and three fields such as

Availability, Identifier and Publisher are mandatory based

on the types of resource. The remaining 11 elements are

optional. All elements are repeatable, and many elements

have qualifiers to specify the context of the data. The

model proposed by Abideen P. S., (2013), is compatible

with the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set.

41

https://lisrbu.wixsite.com/dlis/rbu-journal-of-lis

Metadata Interoperability

Interoperability is ‘the ability of two or more organizations

or systems to be engaged in the process of ensuring that

the organizations or systems exchange information and reuse

the information, internally or externally’ (Martins, P.

V., & Da Silva, A. R., 2008). The interoperability of e-

governance services are very important, in order to feel the

convenience of application of technology in the day today

life of the citizens. Different studies conducted by Madalli,

D. P. (2007), Bountouri et al., (2008), Charalabidis &

Askounis, (2008), Saekow & Boonmee, (2009), Ojo et al.,

(2009, 2010) are mainly pointing to the importance of

metadata standardisation for interoperability in e-

governance. Initiatives at the global and national level in

metadata standardization is a positive direction in e-

governance interoperability.

General issues in interoperability especially in the context

of India is being highlighted by Madalli, D. P., (2007).

These include:

Requirement for specific type of data sets, and

varying forms of interaction and delivery of services.

Variations in e-governance method form department

to department.

Disparity as different departments adopted e-

governance at different times and following the

standards and technologies that were available at that

time.

Disparity of cultural influences in approach to

information and its representation.

India having multi-lingual communities that warrants

cross lingual retrieval.

All of these reasons warrant that measures of

interoperability be implemented in e-governance system

(Madalli, D. P., 2007).

Since metadata schemas define the structure of the

metadata description, the data input to the e-governance

systems needs to be interoperable. It is being facilitated by

using the data encoding systems, which specify the rules

for vocabulary control, like in the case of an authority list

in a library database. Encoding schemes help remove

inconsistency in data entry by reducing the chance of using

variant or incorrect forms of the same data. Abideen P. S.,

(2011) illustrated a detailed description of encoding

systems used for metadata interoperability in various

countries. Once the standardized data is available, it will

be useful for the computers to analyze it, using various

technologies, including that of the semantic web.

Conclusions

Analysis of the budget documents of India (Ministry of

Finance, 2021) shows that government of India and state

governments are earmarking crores of rupees year after

year on e-governance projects in order to ensure

efficiency, transparency, and a better citizen-friendly

interface. To exchange data between these e-governance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!