RBU_JR_LIS_V23_2021-FULL_TEXT-E-Copy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

India that have the most frequently published cancerliterature (Patra & Bhattacharya, 2005). Bradford's andLotka's Law has been used for this study. Thecontributions of Indian authors to international journals arevery low. A list of authors who published ten or morepapers between 1967 and 2004 is drawn up and presented.The number of such authors is 37 (1.35 percent), and thenumber of authors with single publications is significant(74.63 percent) (Eysenbach, 2002).The findings of a study show that most TEL papers, led bycase studies and general analysis, fall into the category ofresearch papers. In the bibliography of the references, thebulk of citations were published in the newspapers and areaccompanied by online sites and books. The study showsthat the total length of papers in some countries is 13,017pages and that the scattering of contributors is minimal(Jena et al., 2012). The results showed the largest numberof research papers published in 2013 was 60 (31.08 %),and the lowest number of papers published in 2009 was 13(6.73 %). 80 (41.45 %) were single authors, and 4 (2.07%) were the least recorded authors. As far as the length ofthe paper was concerned, most of the paper's length was11-15 with 70 (36.26 %), and 07 (3.62 %) of the paperlength was 1-5 pages. The total references were found tobe 3243, and most of the references were found in 2013 at1183 (50.49 %), and fewer references were found in 2008at 121 (3.73 %) (Anwar & Zhiwei, 2020).The study explores the over-time increase in Indian AIDSresearch products based on PubMed and Web of Sciencebibliographical data under the law of Lotka, thedistribution of authorship was investigated. The scatteringlaw of Bradford was used in the identification of mainnewspapers. The study describes involved agencies andregional distributions of the research results for IndianHelps. The annual data review indicates that since 1992literature has increased rapidly (Patra & Chand, 2007).The study found that the LICs published 796 contributions,comprising 1.08 percent of the total biomedical researchpublished by LICs and 0.27 percent of the world's healthcommunication research. Malawi had the highest numberof publications per GDP, with 32,811 published per billionUS$. Uganda had the largest contribution per population,with 9,579 publications per million people. Ethiopiareceived the highest number of contributions per primaryschool enrolment, with a ratio of 2.461 publications perpercent of GDP. The role of health communication inpromoting HIV awareness and prevention has been themost important (Mheidly & Fares, 2020).The paper focuses on integrating SNSs into their dailycommunication for academics by academic staff(technological and medical applications). A multi-methodresearch study was conducted, and it was found that mostusers preferred Facebook and ResearchGate for academicresearch purposes. Collaborative and peer-to-peer learninghave common benefits from the social network, althoughsome concerns about privacy and cyber-bullying havebeen articulated (Abdullatif et al., 2017). The degree ofinfection in their regions and mutual perceptual prejudicetoward COVID19 are not associated positively. The"COVID-19" and "SARS-CoV-2" official titles have notde facto been the standard. Still, full official names areexempted from being the proper contribution to theresistance of negative perceptual prejudices and collectivebehavioral inclinations in pani (Hua & Shaw, 2020).Research questions What are the publishing trends in infodemic from2004-2020? What are the preferred journals of researchers ininfodemic? What are the most productive countries,organizations, and authors in infodemic? What are the authorship and collaborative patternsof research in infodemic? What are the frequently used keywords ininfodemic research?Methodology82https://lisrbu.wixsite.com/dlis/rbu-journal-of-lisRBU Journal of library & Information Science, V. 23, 2021The Scopus database was used to retrieve bibliographicdata using the "Infodemic" keywords available in the title,abstract, and keyword fields. The period from 2004 to2020 was selected to gather a wide range of data. Thesearch query used for retrieving data is as under: Searchquery: (TITLE (Infodemic OR Infodemics ORinfodemiology)) OR (AUTHKEY (Infodemic ORInfodemics OR infodemiology)) OR (TITLE-ABS-KEY(Infodemic OR Infodemics OR infodemiology)) OR(Infodemic OR Infodemics OR infodemiology).A total of 919 data were retrieved dated Jul 14, 2020, andthe duplication was zero. Exclusive type of document:review, note, editorial material, letter, short survey,meeting abstract, news item, correction. Document typeincluded, i.e. (Article OR Review OR Conference PaperOR Book Chapter OR Book). A total of 919 documentswere found from the Scopus database. After the manualscreening of the records, 675 documents were selected forthe study, and 244 irrelevant documents were excluded.The total citation accumulated by the article wasconsidered for the bibliometric analysis. Basic bibliometricapproaches have been used to evaluate annual growthtrends in production, journals, institutes, and authors. Thecitation obtained in the year of publication of the paperswas issued.The impact factor of the journals was taken from theJournal Citation Report (JCR) of the 2019 edition(compiled by Clarivate Analytics) and referred to asIF2019. The Hirsch Index (h-Index) was collected fromthe most productive writers and organizations (Hirsch,2005). The ScientoPy and VOSviewer Viewer have drawnco-citation networks between productive authors of highlycited articles.Data Analysis and InterpretationBibliographic data for the study was obtained from theScopus database using the keyword "Infodemic" in thearticle title, abstract, or keywords. Between 2004–2020,18140 citations, 675 publications, 634 journals, 2218authors affiliated with 1106 institutions, and 84 countrieswere found. These documents received 18140 citationspublished in 961 English and 12 other languages.Publications and citations trend on InfodemicresearchTable1& Fig.1 show the articles' distribution in the studyby year, the total publication, and the total citations. In
Ahemd, Hussain and Nausheen: Mapping output of scientific literature …2020, the maximum number of articles reaches 131 out ofthe total number of articles, while in 2019, 111 articles andin 2018, 85 articles were published. The minimum numberof articles in 2009 is eight articles; in 2008, there are sixarticles; in 2006, there are five articles; in 2007, there arethree articles; in 2004 and 2005, there are only twoarticles.In addition, 2087 citations were ranked first in 2010. In2013, 1634 citations were ranked second, and in 2014,1626 were ranked third. The minimum number of citationsis 78 in 2005, 43 in 2007, and 27 in 2004.Year TotalPublicationsTotalCitationsCitationImpact2004 2 27 13.502005 2 78 39.002006 5 889 177.802007 3 43 14.332008 6 254 42.332009 8 630 78.752010 14 2087 149.072011 16 919 57.442012 27 454 16.812013 41 1634 39.852014 50 1626 32.522015 52 926 17.812016 54 755 13.982017 68 579 8.512018 85 475 5.592019 111 316 2.852020 131 184 1.40Table 1 Publication and citations trend on Infodemic researchConference Papers 88 1096 12.45Reviews 65 2082 32.03Table 2 Document TypesNotes: [TP=Total Publication, TC=Total Citation, CI=CitationsImpact]Influential countriesTable 3 displays the top 10 most productive and influentialcountries in Infodemic research between 2004 and 2020.The USA was the most influential country, with 138papers (Freq.=0.38983) led by Italy (35; 0.09887) and theUnited Kingdom (25;0.07062) ranked 1-3.The USA was the top-ranked single country paper (SCP)with 122, while the United Kingdom and Canada (SCP =15) ranked second, and Italy and China (SCP = 14) rankedthird. Italy has the highest proportion of multi-countrypaper (MCP) with 21 (MCP Ratio = 0.6), preceded bythe USA (MCP = 16; MCP Ratio = 0.116) and the UnitedKingdom (MCP = 10; MCP Ratio = 0.4) with 1 to 3.Country Articles Freq SCP MCP MCPRatioUSA 138 0.38983 122 16 0.116Italy 35 0.09887 14 21 0.6United 25 0.07062 15 10 0.4KingdomChina 23 0.06497 14 9 0.391Canada 19 0.05367 15 4 0.211Korea 8 0.0226 6 2 0.25Australia 7 0.01977 5 2 0.286Brazil 7 0.01977 6 1 0.143Germany 7 0.01977 6 1 0.143HongKong7 0.01977 5 2 0.286Table 3 Top Ten influential countries on Infodemic researchNotes: [SCP=Single Country Paper, MCP= multi-countrypaper]Attributes of the most cited documentsFigure 1 Publication and citations trend on Infodemic researchTypes of documentsA total of 675 documents met the selection criteria. Fivedocument types were found in these 675 publications;article (486) was the most frequent form of publicationswith 8581 citations, followed by Conference Papers (88)with 1096 citations, Reviews (65) with 2082 citations,Book chapters (30) with 37 citations, and Books (6) with80 citations (See table 2).Documents Type TP TC CIArticles 486 8581 17.66Books 6 80 13.33Book Chapters 30 37 1.2383https://lisrbu.wixsite.com/dlis/rbu-journal-of-lisThe number of citations quantifies the importance of anessay within a given study field (Garfield, 1973). Thecitation demonstrates the work and results of scholars inthe field of study. A high number of citations indicate theimportance of research in this field. It provides insight intothe impact of research work over a while (Smith, 2008).However, the citation changes with time, known as thecycle of citation life (Galiani & Gálvez, 2017). A similarstudy has been carried out in the case of highly citedarticles on Infodemic research.Table 4 shows the top 10 most-cited countries inInfodemic research between 2004 to 2020. The USA wasthe most productive country with 284 documents rankedfirst, followed by Italy (71) second and the United
Page 1:
e-Published on 14th November 2021
Page 4 and 5:
About the JournalThe RBU Journal of
Page 6 and 7:
Objective-1-2 linesMethodology-1-2
Page 8 and 9:
UGC CARE enlisted JournalRBU JOURNA
Page 10 and 11:
RBU Journal of Library & Informatio
Page 12 and 13:
found various literary works regula
Page 14 and 15:
Biswas & Mukherjee: Books for bulle
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Sarkar & Bhattacharya: Library of C
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Choudhury & Rath: Use of college li
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
RBU Journal of library & Informatio
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Sharma & Karkee: Assessment of News
Page 44 and 45: Sharma & Karkee: Assessment of News
Page 50 and 51: Sainul: Information Management …I
Page 52 and 53: Sainul: Information Management …m
Page 54 and 55: Sainul: Information Management …s
Page 56 and 57: RBU Journal of library & Informatio
Page 68 and 69: Majumdar: 110 years influence of
Page 76 and 77: Saha & Hatua: Generalities Class (0
Page 88 and 89: Sl. NoMode of ILPNo. ofRespondents(
Page 102 and 103: 2010. Five document types were foun
Page 118 and 119: On the basis of data collections, t
Page 136 and 137: 1 Changes of Nomenclatures andIncor
show all

RBU_JR_LIS_V23_2021-FULL_TEXT-E-Copy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?