26.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C<br />

(b)<br />

B<br />

Wrinkles in Square Membranes 119<br />

Fig. 5. Wrinkled shapes for (a) T1 T /T2 T = 1and(b)T1 T /T2 T = 4.<br />

Table 1.Wrinkles under symmetric loading (all values in mm)<br />

n λ at r = 70 mm A<br />

T (N) Eq. 21 Experiment Eq. 20 Experiment Eq. 22 Experiment<br />

5 9.6 8 11.6 11.0 0.16 0.12<br />

20 13.6 11 8.3 9.7 0.22 0.14<br />

5 Validation of Analytical and Finite-Element Models<br />

Table 1 compares the predicted wrinkle half-wavelengths and amplitudes from<br />

Eqs. (20)–(22) with experimental measurements for a symmetrically loaded<br />

membrane, i.e. for T1 T /T2 T =1.<br />

For the load case T1 T /T2 T =4,Table 2 compares the analytical predictions<br />

for the large diagonal wrinkle at the centre of the membrane, for two different<br />

membrane thicknesses, with predictions from ABAQUS and experimental<br />

measurements. The wavelength predictions are very close. The wrinkleamplitudes<br />

have been estimated first using only analytical solutions, Eq. (24) with<br />

δ1 and δ2 from Eq. (25), and second using Eq. (24) but with corner deflections<br />

from a 2-D IMP analysis. We can see that the fully analytical estimates are up<br />

to 88% higher than those measured experimentally, but if we use the corner<br />

displacements from the 2D finite-element analysis we obtain estimates that<br />

are only 48% and 16% higher than the measurements.<br />

(a)<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!