27.12.2012 Views

Madison Cultural Plan 2011 - City of Madison, Wisconsin

Madison Cultural Plan 2011 - City of Madison, Wisconsin

Madison Cultural Plan 2011 - City of Madison, Wisconsin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A funding<br />

mechanism<br />

that ties the<br />

investment in<br />

public art to the<br />

annual level <strong>of</strong><br />

local public<br />

capital<br />

investment is<br />

needed.<br />

III.D.7.d.iii. PUBLIC ART<br />

<strong>Madison</strong>’s public art program has gained enormous support over the last several<br />

years, as implementation <strong>of</strong> the Public Art Framework has moved ahead. Now, a<br />

funding mechanism that ties the investment in public art to the annual level <strong>of</strong><br />

local public capital investment is needed. These mechanisms, broadly called<br />

“percent for art”, insure the ongoing place <strong>of</strong> aesthetics in city-building.<br />

<strong>Madison</strong> should adopt a percent for art approach, generating a revenue stream<br />

for public art from infrastructure, landscape and TIF projects. Funds generated via<br />

the percent for art mechanism, exclusive <strong>of</strong> those generated by TIF districts, should<br />

be made available for permanent and temporary installations via the <strong>Madison</strong> Arts<br />

Commission’s “Blink” Program, for contracts for services related to capital project<br />

design, for the effective management and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the public art program<br />

and collection including any necessary artists’ development programs, and for<br />

design competitions. Set-asides generated by TIF districts should be used in<br />

compliance with the TID statute, generally confined to capital costs <strong>of</strong> art.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> a percent for art ordinance should be undertaken in<br />

consultation with the <strong>City</strong> Treasurer’s Office, the <strong>City</strong> Finance Office, the <strong>City</strong><br />

Attorney’s <strong>of</strong>fice, and the <strong>Madison</strong> Arts Commission so that funds generated are<br />

structured and managed appropriately, whether internal to the city or via an<br />

independent fund (for example, held by the Community Foundation in a<br />

dedicated fund).<br />

Staffing costs for public art projects are also underfunded, in particular because no<br />

mechanism increases staff time for that work in relationship to the number and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> projects undertaken. The Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning should explore the<br />

model currently in use in <strong>City</strong> Parks for supporting staff via billings to specific capital<br />

projects and any other models that could keep the Arts Commission’s staff<br />

allocation consistent with its capital projects-related workload. This mechanism<br />

should create a permanent position. See Recommendation 46.<br />

<strong>Madison</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Findings<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!