03.01.2024 Views

SELS Dialogues Journal Volume 3 Issue 1

A diverse collection of articles, each offering a unique perspective and contributing to the ever-expanding landscape of knowledge and creativity.

A diverse collection of articles, each offering a unique perspective and contributing to the ever-expanding landscape of knowledge and creativity.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Educational Technology<br />

• Use Images/Diagrams: Currently, ChatGPT3.5<br />

does not accept images and therefore is incapable<br />

of generating answers for questions that require<br />

analysis of images. For example, instead of<br />

asking “What condition could result in the plasma<br />

portion of blood turning red once the blood is<br />

fractionated?”, I showed a picture of fractionated<br />

blood with the condition. In another instance,<br />

I showed a graph that plots the result from an<br />

experiment and asked questions about it. Without<br />

the image, ChatGPT was unable to answer the<br />

question.<br />

• Applications: ChatGPT’s strength lies in its ability<br />

to draw information from its vast knowledge<br />

repository. It struggles with questions that require<br />

deduction, inference or analysis beyond factual<br />

recollection. It turns out, the MS questions on<br />

my test were a mix of knowledge-based and<br />

application-based questions. When I separated<br />

the MS questions into these 2 categories, ChatGPT<br />

failed 100% of the time with the MS application<br />

questions (i.e. application questions with multiple<br />

correct answers). It either misses some of the<br />

correct answers or chooses incorrect ones.<br />

This probably explains why the MS score was<br />

somewhere between MC and application scores<br />

from my initial testing. When I tested additional<br />

application questions (with one correct answer)<br />

from other assessments, ChatGPT consistently<br />

scored around the low 60% range.<br />

ChatGPT has proven itself to be a formidable tool<br />

capable of answering my test questions with impressive<br />

accuracy. While I have identified ways to reduce<br />

ChatGPT’s performances, my goal is not to create a test<br />

that ChatGPT will fail. If such a test exists, students will<br />

likely perform poorly on it as well. I don’t think we should<br />

be creating tests with the mindset that every student will<br />

be using ChatGPT during the test, that scenario is highly<br />

unlikely. Instead, what I learned from this exercise is to<br />

look at my assessments from a different perspective.<br />

Perhaps some of my test questions became obsolete<br />

in the era of AI. More powerful versions of ChatGPT<br />

are likely on their way, rather than working against it,<br />

maybe the best way moving forward is to incorporate it<br />

into my assessments. Maybe ask students to analyze<br />

and evaluate its response in an application question or<br />

maybe I can ask students to create test questions that<br />

ChatGPT cannot answer. The best approach will likely<br />

depend on the subject and the student demographic.<br />

So…will ChatGPT get an A on YOUR test? Maybe it’s time<br />

to find out.<br />

Author’s Bio<br />

Vincent teaches in the Pre-Health program. He<br />

is interested in innovative ways to make learning<br />

a fun experience for his students. His teaching<br />

approach emphasizes on understanding rather<br />

than memorizing. Vincent’s own passion for<br />

science helps motivate students and ensures<br />

they remain engaged during his class.<br />

<strong>SELS</strong> DIALOGUES | 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!