Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...
Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...
Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TRAINING<br />
Im roved tech manuals, e lunations, documentation. The technical manuals do not always present<br />
in E rmation in a user-frien 1p Iy way, especially as there can be a number of manifestations of the same<br />
problem. Automated features each require different treatment.<br />
Manuals provided for my fleet iype are below standard, new procedures are passed by inter-office<br />
memos or more often than not, by hearsay. Most inappropriate.<br />
Line training<br />
Forty-four pilots commented on the quantity, content/syllabus and organisation of their line<br />
training.<br />
Of those who commented on the duration of line training, all stated that more line training<br />
(more sectors) would have been beneficial. For example:<br />
More line trainin . There was not enough time available during line training to learn about the<br />
systems in more jetail.<br />
More sectors as pilot flying.<br />
More sectors for those who have not done FMC work before.<br />
Comments on the content or syllabus of line training were almost equally distributed across<br />
the following issues:<br />
greater emphasis on automation/systems;<br />
more dynamic training;<br />
more informative training;<br />
greater emphasis on crew roles (PF/PNF); and<br />
more information on company procedures.<br />
Comments concerning the organisation of line training suggested allowing more<br />
observer/supernumerary flights, and providing better training blocks/schedules.<br />
Training staff<br />
This subgroup comprised 37 responses. These comments addressed the selection of ground-<br />
training staff, the quality of instruction, and aspects of the training program relating to both<br />
ground, simulator and line-training personnel.<br />
Five respondents believed that the selection process for instructors was inadequate. All<br />
indicated that instructors were not necessarily selected or appointed according to their<br />
instructional abilities:<br />
Six years in an airline and IO0 years as a captain does not qualify a pilot to train.<br />
Most of these respondents were dissatisfied with the ability of their instructors (knowledge,<br />
language, experience), while some suggested that instructors should undergo specific training<br />
in instructional techniques, or that the company should provide better instructor training.<br />
The following comments illustrate this view:<br />
Better instructors. On this aircraft conversion I was given no training which I could d’ iscern as<br />
training. Basically I completed the course finding out as I went along by myself. This airline’s concept<br />
of training is ‘It‘s in the book‘. Read the book and you’ll find out.<br />
Educate the trainer in teaching methods.<br />
Train the trainin pilots. A line captain is made a training captain and is not even given a brief on<br />
what is require2<br />
Approximately half of the respondents suggested that training personnel should be specialist,<br />
full-time and qualified instructors. Other answers centred around three suggestions: that<br />
75