03.01.2013 Views

Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...

Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...

Advanced Technology Aircraft Safety Survey Report - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRAINING<br />

Im roved tech manuals, e lunations, documentation. The technical manuals do not always present<br />

in E rmation in a user-frien 1p Iy way, especially as there can be a number of manifestations of the same<br />

problem. Automated features each require different treatment.<br />

Manuals provided for my fleet iype are below standard, new procedures are passed by inter-office<br />

memos or more often than not, by hearsay. Most inappropriate.<br />

Line training<br />

Forty-four pilots commented on the quantity, content/syllabus and organisation of their line<br />

training.<br />

Of those who commented on the duration of line training, all stated that more line training<br />

(more sectors) would have been beneficial. For example:<br />

More line trainin . There was not enough time available during line training to learn about the<br />

systems in more jetail.<br />

More sectors as pilot flying.<br />

More sectors for those who have not done FMC work before.<br />

Comments on the content or syllabus of line training were almost equally distributed across<br />

the following issues:<br />

greater emphasis on automation/systems;<br />

more dynamic training;<br />

more informative training;<br />

greater emphasis on crew roles (PF/PNF); and<br />

more information on company procedures.<br />

Comments concerning the organisation of line training suggested allowing more<br />

observer/supernumerary flights, and providing better training blocks/schedules.<br />

Training staff<br />

This subgroup comprised 37 responses. These comments addressed the selection of ground-<br />

training staff, the quality of instruction, and aspects of the training program relating to both<br />

ground, simulator and line-training personnel.<br />

Five respondents believed that the selection process for instructors was inadequate. All<br />

indicated that instructors were not necessarily selected or appointed according to their<br />

instructional abilities:<br />

Six years in an airline and IO0 years as a captain does not qualify a pilot to train.<br />

Most of these respondents were dissatisfied with the ability of their instructors (knowledge,<br />

language, experience), while some suggested that instructors should undergo specific training<br />

in instructional techniques, or that the company should provide better instructor training.<br />

The following comments illustrate this view:<br />

Better instructors. On this aircraft conversion I was given no training which I could d’ iscern as<br />

training. Basically I completed the course finding out as I went along by myself. This airline’s concept<br />

of training is ‘It‘s in the book‘. Read the book and you’ll find out.<br />

Educate the trainer in teaching methods.<br />

Train the trainin pilots. A line captain is made a training captain and is not even given a brief on<br />

what is require2<br />

Approximately half of the respondents suggested that training personnel should be specialist,<br />

full-time and qualified instructors. Other answers centred around three suggestions: that<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!