03.01.2013 Views

Download - The India Economy Review

Download - The India Economy Review

Download - The India Economy Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P LANNING P ARADIGM<br />

It is a moot question whether the<br />

Commission can be transformed into<br />

a Systems Reform Commission<br />

This has long term implications for In-<br />

dia’s teaming millions and brings into<br />

focus the issue of “measurable growth<br />

and meaningful growth”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>India</strong>n economy whose production<br />

base was broadened and increased by rise<br />

in demand from domestic consumers,<br />

during the fi rst four decades of planned<br />

development has certainly received in-<br />

creased trade benefi ts from the external<br />

orientation of policy and programmes in<br />

the recent years. Along with these benefi ts<br />

came the unavoidable impact of global<br />

fi nancial meltdown in 2008-09. While the<br />

nation benefi ted from the circumspect<br />

policies pursued in capital account and<br />

current account convertibility in moderat-<br />

ing the impact of fi nancial melt down, the<br />

downturn in major economies has cer-<br />

tainly affected trade and is now having a<br />

lagged effect on domestic employment<br />

and income growth. This should be kept<br />

in view while we discuss measures to sustain<br />

high growth rate in the economy and<br />

consider steps to protect different sections<br />

of society.<br />

Conclusions<br />

While the sharp increase in the plan outlays<br />

at the centre and the states have become<br />

noticeable, there is continuing<br />

concern over the issues of equity in redistribution<br />

of resources and effi ciency in<br />

utilization of resources, particularly, in<br />

determining the respective shares of various<br />

states in federal transfers. Public Finance<br />

analysts have pointed out that resolving<br />

tension between equity and<br />

effi ciency is a fundamental challenge in<br />

66 THE IIPM THINK TANK<br />

public policy. In the federal context, this<br />

creates a dilemma for those interested in<br />

the task of adjucating the transfer of federal<br />

funds to the states.<br />

What is signifi cant and should not be<br />

missed by any one is that in <strong>India</strong>, the<br />

pressures of economic growth and fi nancial<br />

management are inextricably intertwined<br />

with social and political objectives<br />

of governance. Rate of growth is to be assessed<br />

along with its quality, and distribution<br />

equity. That has been the sheet anchor<br />

of our development planning. Reiterating<br />

this, in his address to the nation on June<br />

25th 2004, the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan<br />

Singh had observed that “Equity<br />

and effi ciency are complementary, not<br />

contradictory, and we must move forward<br />

on both these, while maintaining a high<br />

degree of fi scal and fi nancial discipline<br />

and a robust external, economic profi le”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Prime Minister also observed that “at<br />

a regional level the disparities are high and<br />

while some regions of the country seem to<br />

be on an accelerating growth path, there<br />

is a concern that other regions are not only<br />

lacking but are also falling behind” and<br />

that “as a nation we cannot accept such<br />

disparities”.<br />

Makeover of<br />

Planning Commission?<br />

Given the benefi t of experience of formulation<br />

and implementation of development<br />

plans of over six decades, we should<br />

be ready to consider various suggestions<br />

for a makeover of the Planning Commission,<br />

in so far as its contribution to the<br />

sustained and inclusive growth of the<br />

economy. It is however a moot question<br />

whether the Planning Commission can be<br />

transformed into a Systems Reform Commission<br />

for resolving the extant systemic<br />

problems as proposed by some. For one<br />

thing the Planning Commission as it is<br />

constituted now, lacks statutory stature<br />

and its present composition with a dominance<br />

of Delhi based and Union centric<br />

economists and bureaucrats does not lend<br />

it much credibility. On the other hand<br />

there are genuine apprehensions among<br />

States regarding the content and quality<br />

of its prescriptions. This in itself may be<br />

a good ground for the makeover of the<br />

Planning Commission. However timing<br />

acquires signifi cance. At a time when<br />

questions are raised about the domains of<br />

the Constitutionally empowered Judiciary<br />

the Legislature and Executive and<br />

there is an overhang of uncertainty, the<br />

scope for Planning Commission to metamorphose<br />

itself into a Systems Reform<br />

Commission must be considered limited,<br />

unless the nation is got prepared and<br />

ready to effect Constitutional amendments.<br />

That does not appear to be visible<br />

on the horizon.<br />

(<strong>The</strong> views expressed in the write-up are<br />

personal and do not reflect the offi cial<br />

policy or position of the organization.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!