14.01.2013 Views

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Matter of Hector S., 11/18/09 NYLJ, 33 (col. 3) (Surr. Ct. Bronx Cty. 2009) (Surr. Holzman)<br />

Upon learning of funds in a Willowbrook class consumer's guardianship account, OMRDD sought,<br />

pursuant to the Willowbrook decree, a declaration of incorrectly paid Medicaid, to have half of those<br />

funds used to repay the debt to Medicaid and to have the other half placed into an SNT-like<br />

arrangements for the consumer's benefit. The court approved the application.<br />

Matter of the Estate of Abraham XX, 11 N.Y. 3d; 871 N.Y.S. 599 (2008)<br />

Pursuant to federal and state law, the <strong>State</strong> holds a remainder interest in all amounts remaining in<br />

the trust "up to an amount equal to the total medical assistance paid". The <strong>Court</strong> of Appeals in this<br />

case interprets that phrase to mean that the <strong>State</strong> may recover the lifetime Medicaid benefits paid on<br />

behalf of the recipient. The <strong>Court</strong> rejected the argument that the phrase means the state’s recovery<br />

of only those payments made after the date of the trust's creation. The <strong>Court</strong> held this to be so even<br />

though the payments made prior to the creation of the trust were properly made to a poor person<br />

who was entitled to Medicaid and thus were properly paid and, but for the later creation of the SNT,<br />

would not have been recoverable.<br />

n. Calculation of NAMI<br />

nd<br />

Matter of Deanna W., 76 A.D.3d 1096; 908 N.Y.S. 2d 692 (2 Dept., 2010)<br />

The Appellate Division, Second Department, held that the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> had erred in directing the<br />

Department of Social Services to disregard guardianship expenses when calculating the IP’s net<br />

available monthly income (NAMI) for the purpose of determining Medicaid eligibility, holding that<br />

the agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, including Medicaid eligibility regulations, was<br />

reasonable.<br />

Matter of Jennings v. Commissioner, NYS Department of Social Services, 71 AD3d 98; 893<br />

N.Y.S.2d 103 (2nd Dept, 2009)<br />

Where the 85 year old settlor of an SNT for the benefit of her disabled son poured all of her recurring<br />

pension and Social Security retirement income into the SNT for her son’s benefit, she was not render<br />

ineligible for Medicaid to pay for her own care in a nursing home, but that income was held to be<br />

appropriately considered as part of the calculation of her post-eligibility NAMI toward her own care.<br />

This case has an excellent discussion of the relationship between Medicaid eligibility and the NAMI<br />

as well as a thorough discussion concerning the history, legal basis and purpose of SNT’s.<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!