MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Article: "Hidden Medicaid Lien? 'Ahlborn Supplemental Needs' ", Jay J. Sangerman,<br />
NYLJ, Feb, 16, 2007, p. 4 , col 4.<br />
The article makes the point that all that Ahlborn may accomplish is the delaying of the satisfaction<br />
of the Medicaid lien until after the death of the beneficiary of the SNT. The author warns attorneys<br />
to be careful when drafting the remainder provisions of SNT's so as not to include in the remainder<br />
ALL the Medicaid funds paid out to the individuals over his lifetime and to be sure to exclude<br />
portions that, under Ahlborn, Medicaid should not recoup.<br />
Matter of Dowd, 2006 NY Misc Lexis 5126; 236 NYLJ 72 (Surr. Ct., Westchester Cty)<br />
(Surr.Scarpino)<br />
rd<br />
17-A ward had a non-payback (3 party) SNT funded directly with an inheritance. He also had two<br />
other guardianship accounts, one funded by an inheritance that went to him directly instead of<br />
directly into an SNT and the other was savings from his own wages. His guardians sought to render<br />
him Medicaid eligible so he could enter a group home and petitioned to pour both accounts into the<br />
existing SNT. The <strong>Court</strong> held that they could not do so but that they could create a payback, (1 st<br />
party) SNT and pour the funds into that which would render him Medicaid eligible during his life<br />
time and he would have to pay back Medicaid upon his death with any remaining funds to the extent<br />
that there were any liens.<br />
Fergeson v. IHB Realty, Inc., 13 Misc.3d 1029; 821 N.Y.S.2d 848 (Sup. Ct. Kings Cty., 2006)<br />
(Lewis, J.)<br />
(N.B. This case raises important issues related to SNT’s but does not involve an SNT)<br />
Supreme <strong>Court</strong>, Kings County held that the US Supreme <strong>Court</strong> decision in Ahlborn did not dictate<br />
that a Medicaid lien should remain unsatisfied just because in hearing a personal injury claim it sent<br />
the damages determination to an arbitrator who did not allocate any portion of the damages to<br />
medical expenses. The court reasoned that when it delegated the damages assessment to the<br />
arbitrator, it reserved for itself the right to determine certain issues, including satisfaction of liens,<br />
when confirming and ordering the arbitration award and it could, consistent with public policy and<br />
the intent of the relevant portions of OBRA‘93, order a portion of the settlement to go to satisfy the<br />
Medicaid lien.<br />
Matter of Dowd, 2006 NY Misc Lexis 5126; 236 NYLJ 72 (Surr. Ct., Westchester Cty)<br />
(Surr. Scarpino)<br />
A mentally retarded 17A ward was the beneficiary of a 3rd party, "non-payback" SNT. He lived at<br />
home and was not receiving Medicaid. In addition to the funds in the SNT, he had two bank<br />
accounts outside of the trust: one containing funds he had inherited directly and the other containing<br />
funds he had earned. When the guardians sought to move him to a group home, they needed to apply<br />
for Medicaid and petitioned the court to transfer the two bank accounts into the existing SNT to<br />
avoid having to spend the funds down to achieve eligibility. DSS objected. The Surrogate denied<br />
69