MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Supreme <strong>Court</strong> of jurisdiction and transfer to Surrogates <strong>Court</strong> was not required.<br />
Matter of Kator, 164 Misc.2d 265; 624 N.Y.S.2d 348 (Sup. Ct., NY Cty., 1995)<br />
Where court appointed co-conservators to manage property of now-deceased IP, and one conservator<br />
moved for an order distributing assets to himself to pay estate expenses and manage estate assets in<br />
his alleged role as administrator of estate prior to court approval of final account of conservators,<br />
notice of motion which was only served upon second conservator was patently insufficient. Article<br />
<strong>81</strong> fails to establish procedure for administration of an estate of a person deemed incapacitated<br />
pursuant to that statute.<br />
Estate of Lawrence Bennett, NYLJ, 2/2/6/2003(Surr. Ct., Queens Cty.)<br />
Motion by alleged distributes of an estate for copy of <strong>Court</strong> Examiner’s file - granted.<br />
Matter of Estate of Tilly Baron, 180 Misc.2d 766; 691 N.Y.S.2d 882 (Surr. Ct., NY Cty., 1999)<br />
<strong>Court</strong> finds that although statute is silent as to when and how a Guardian whose ward has died must<br />
surrender responsibility for ward's assets to the fiduciary appointed for deceased ward's estate, <strong>Court</strong><br />
directs Guardian to turn assets over as soon as such fiduciary has been appointed. However, <strong>Court</strong><br />
permits guardian to retain a reserve pending disposition of final accounting under these<br />
circumstances. <strong>Court</strong> suggests that additional legislation is needed to facilitate orderly turnover of<br />
assets under these circumstances.<br />
Matter of Saphier, 167 Misc.2d 130; 637 N.Y.S.2d 630 (NY Cty. Sup., 1995)(Lebedeff, J.)<br />
Shortly after guardianship for petition was filed for AIP, a 90 year-old world famous violinist, her<br />
Stradivarius violin disappeared. AIP died shortly after special guardian was appointed to arrange<br />
for her care. After her death, the investigation of the missing Stradivarius continued because it was<br />
worth 3 million dollars and she had left her estate to many charities. Guardianship was continued<br />
under authority of Supreme <strong>Court</strong> so that special guardian could continue to protect property<br />
interests of deceased in recovering violin, as well as to place any other estate issues before proper<br />
Surrogate <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
This <strong>Court</strong> too finds that statute is silent as to when and how a Guardian whose ward has died must<br />
surrender responsibility for ward's assets to the fiduciary appointed for deceased ward's estate. Here,<br />
<strong>Court</strong> directs Guardian to turn assets over but permits guardian to retain a reserve pending<br />
disposition of final accounting. <strong>Court</strong> suggests that additional legislation is need to facilitate orderly<br />
turnover of assets und these circumstances.<br />
rd<br />
Matter of Rose “BB”, 246 A.D.2d 820; 666 N.Y.S.2d 968 (3 Dept., 1998), subseq. appeal, 262<br />
A.D.2d 805; 692 N.Y.S.2d 237, lv to app. denied, 93 N.Y.2d 1039; 697 N.Y.S.2d 560 (1999)<br />
Death of AIP rendered moot appeal of order appointing guardian.<br />
230