14.01.2013 Views

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Supreme <strong>Court</strong> of jurisdiction and transfer to Surrogates <strong>Court</strong> was not required.<br />

Matter of Kator, 164 Misc.2d 265; 624 N.Y.S.2d 348 (Sup. Ct., NY Cty., 1995)<br />

Where court appointed co-conservators to manage property of now-deceased IP, and one conservator<br />

moved for an order distributing assets to himself to pay estate expenses and manage estate assets in<br />

his alleged role as administrator of estate prior to court approval of final account of conservators,<br />

notice of motion which was only served upon second conservator was patently insufficient. Article<br />

<strong>81</strong> fails to establish procedure for administration of an estate of a person deemed incapacitated<br />

pursuant to that statute.<br />

Estate of Lawrence Bennett, NYLJ, 2/2/6/2003(Surr. Ct., Queens Cty.)<br />

Motion by alleged distributes of an estate for copy of <strong>Court</strong> Examiner’s file - granted.<br />

Matter of Estate of Tilly Baron, 180 Misc.2d 766; 691 N.Y.S.2d 882 (Surr. Ct., NY Cty., 1999)<br />

<strong>Court</strong> finds that although statute is silent as to when and how a Guardian whose ward has died must<br />

surrender responsibility for ward's assets to the fiduciary appointed for deceased ward's estate, <strong>Court</strong><br />

directs Guardian to turn assets over as soon as such fiduciary has been appointed. However, <strong>Court</strong><br />

permits guardian to retain a reserve pending disposition of final accounting under these<br />

circumstances. <strong>Court</strong> suggests that additional legislation is needed to facilitate orderly turnover of<br />

assets under these circumstances.<br />

Matter of Saphier, 167 Misc.2d 130; 637 N.Y.S.2d 630 (NY Cty. Sup., 1995)(Lebedeff, J.)<br />

Shortly after guardianship for petition was filed for AIP, a 90 year-old world famous violinist, her<br />

Stradivarius violin disappeared. AIP died shortly after special guardian was appointed to arrange<br />

for her care. After her death, the investigation of the missing Stradivarius continued because it was<br />

worth 3 million dollars and she had left her estate to many charities. Guardianship was continued<br />

under authority of Supreme <strong>Court</strong> so that special guardian could continue to protect property<br />

interests of deceased in recovering violin, as well as to place any other estate issues before proper<br />

Surrogate <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

This <strong>Court</strong> too finds that statute is silent as to when and how a Guardian whose ward has died must<br />

surrender responsibility for ward's assets to the fiduciary appointed for deceased ward's estate. Here,<br />

<strong>Court</strong> directs Guardian to turn assets over but permits guardian to retain a reserve pending<br />

disposition of final accounting. <strong>Court</strong> suggests that additional legislation is need to facilitate orderly<br />

turnover of assets und these circumstances.<br />

rd<br />

Matter of Rose “BB”, 246 A.D.2d 820; 666 N.Y.S.2d 968 (3 Dept., 1998), subseq. appeal, 262<br />

A.D.2d 805; 692 N.Y.S.2d 237, lv to app. denied, 93 N.Y.2d 1039; 697 N.Y.S.2d 560 (1999)<br />

Death of AIP rendered moot appeal of order appointing guardian.<br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!