MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
denied reformation but permits creating of payback trusts. See also,<br />
Matter of Katherine H. Mortimer, NYLJ, p. 24, col 5, 6/15/04 (Surr. Preminger)(NY<br />
County)(also denying reformation).<br />
Matter of Ciraolo, NYLJ, p. 31, 2/9/01 (Surr. Ct., Kings Cty .) (Feinberg, J.)<br />
<strong>Court</strong> permits reformation stating: “it is divorced from the realities of life to presume that if the<br />
testator were aware of the facts as they now exist, he would desire to pay the immense cost for his<br />
child’s care in preference to having society share his burden. (Citing Matter of Escher)<br />
Matter of Henry J. Winski, NYLJ, 6/30/03, p.33, col. 1<br />
Example of reformation of testamentary trust into SNT. (No discussion)<br />
Article: Departing from Terms of a Trust : Doctrine of Equitable Deviation Comes into Play,<br />
NYLJ p. 1 , vol. 234 , Oct 3 , 2005<br />
h. Trustee Compensation/Legal Fees<br />
S.D. v 2150 LLC, 33 Misc3d 1201A, 2011 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4553 (Sup. Ct., Bronx Cty., 2011)<br />
Supreme <strong>Court</strong> denied SNT trustee’s application to approve a trustee compensation agreement,<br />
noting that in the absence of a court order or provision in the ward’s infant compromise order,<br />
compensation shall be in accordance with SCPA § 2309.<br />
nd<br />
Matter of Marion C.W., 83 AD3d 1089; 925 N.Y.S.2d 558 (2 Dept., 2011)<br />
Appellate Division affirms Supreme <strong>Court</strong>’s award of attorney’s fees to non-party trustee of the<br />
AIP’s trust, noting that it is proper for the court in which the trust litigation is conducted to determine<br />
the amount and source of counsel fees in that litigation.<br />
Matter of the Application of Wachovia Bank, N.A, as trustee of the Article Sixth Trust of the<br />
Will of Edith M. Leslie , NYLJ, Sept. 9, 2008, p. 36, col. 6 (Surr Ct. NY Cty., Surr. Glen)<br />
Although it had initially been contemplated that the Surrogate would retain jurisdiction over an SNT<br />
established in decedent's will for the benefit of her disabled daughter, given that there was also an<br />
Art. <strong>81</strong> guardian and therefore continuing jurisdiction of Supreme <strong>Court</strong> over the guardianship, and<br />
given that the trustee of the SNT was the same person as the guardian, issues regarding commissions<br />
of the SNT trustee were to be addressed in Supreme <strong>Court</strong> consistent with <strong>MHL</strong> <strong>81</strong>.28.<br />
Matter of Sussman, NYLJ, p. 25, 9/7/04 (Surr. Ct. Westchester Cty)(Surr. Scarpino)<br />
Counsel fees set by court upon Affirmation of Services and paid from the funds earmarked for the<br />
85