14.01.2013 Views

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Matter of Baird, 167 Misc.2d 526; 634 N.Y.S.2d 971 (Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., 1995)<br />

Guardian may renounce inheritance on behalf of IP in order to retain IP’s Medicaid eligibility if IP<br />

could have exercised same option had she not had guardian.<br />

Matter of Beller (Maltzman), 1994 NY Misc. Lexis 698; 212 NYLJ 43 (Sup. Ct., Kings Cty.)<br />

(Leone, J.)<br />

In this excellent analysis of Medicaid planning under Article <strong>81</strong>, the court ordered that guardian (son<br />

of <strong>81</strong>-year-old nursing home patient with degenerative dementia that is not expected to improve) be<br />

permitted to transfer his mother’s assets to himself and her grandchildren for the purpose of making<br />

her eligible for Medicaid that will pay for her nursing home stay. <strong>Court</strong> held that under §<strong>81</strong>.21,<br />

patient; 1) lacks the mental capacity to perform this act and is not likely to regain it because of her<br />

degenerative condition; 2) there was clear and convincing evidence that a competent person would<br />

perform these acts (the transfers) under the same circumstances as no one would rationally choose<br />

to “spend-down” all of their assets for nursing home care when the law provides an estate-preserving<br />

alternative; 3) there was clear and convincing evidence, shown by her will, that the patient, when<br />

she had capacity, did not manifest any intention inconsistent with the acts for which approval has<br />

been sought.<br />

Matter of Cooper (Daniels), 162 Misc.2d 840; 618 N.Y.S.2d 499 (Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., 1994)<br />

Guardian could transfer IP’s property to daughter to make IP eligible for Medicaid. IP should be<br />

permitted to have same options available to him with respect to transfers of his or her property that<br />

are available to competent individuals. A reasonable individual in father's position would be likely<br />

to make proposed transfer since such person would prefer that this property pass to his child rather<br />

than serve as a source of payment for Medicaid and nursing home care bills where choice is<br />

available.<br />

Matter of Da Ronca (Da Ronca), 167 Misc.2d 140; 638 N.Y.S.2d 275 (Sup. Ct., Westchester<br />

Cty., 1994)<br />

Guardian who is wife may transfer the husband's assets to herself where Medicaid will pick up cost<br />

of nursing home care and cost of nursing home care will deplete estate in less than seven years,<br />

which will render his wife and son destitute. <strong>MHL</strong> <strong>81</strong>.20 (a) (6) (iv) provides that guardian of the<br />

property shall use property and financial resources and income available therefrom to maintain and<br />

support IP, and to maintain and support those persons dependent upon IP." <strong>MHL</strong> <strong>81</strong>.21 (a)(2)<br />

provides that powers of a guardian may include the power to "provide support for persons dependent<br />

upon [IP] for support, whether or not incapacitated person is legally obligated to provide that<br />

support."<br />

Matter of Driscoll, 162 Misc.2d 840; 618 N.Y.S.2d 499 (Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., 1993)<br />

Petitioner, Article <strong>81</strong> guardian of his wife, sought power to renounce on her behalf a substantial<br />

inheritance (the ½ share) that his wife was due to receive from their deceased son. Social Services<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!