16.01.2013 Views

Mind-Munitions

Mind-Munitions

Mind-Munitions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Bolshevik Revolution and the War of Ideologies<br />

203<br />

that Soviet films earned more at the box-office than imported products.<br />

Lenin had nationalized the Russian film industry in August<br />

1919 but, starved of film stock and equipment from abroad, not to<br />

mention the shortages of electricity and of those many technicians,<br />

actors, and directors who had fled the revolution, it was unlikely<br />

that film propaganda itself played a significant role in determining<br />

the final outcome of the revolution. What the available films did in<br />

the countryside was to attract a curious audience, whereupon the<br />

officials from the agit-trains would disembark to deliver their<br />

message using classic techniques of crowd manipulation.<br />

From this disastrous beginning, however, the Soviet film industry<br />

soon began to produce one of the most acclaimed bodies of work<br />

in the history of world cinema. A national production company,<br />

Sovkino, was established in 1925 and new studios were set up in<br />

Moscow, Leningrad, Kiev, and Odessa; thirteen were functioning<br />

across the nation by 1928 producing 123 films in that year, each<br />

reaching an average audience of 2 1 /2 million people. Virtually all<br />

the films were made to serve the State. Battleship Potemkin (1926),<br />

made by Sergei Eisenstein, portrayed the 1905 mutiny at Odessa<br />

but its message had more to do with propaganda than with history.<br />

Eisenstein’s next film, October ( 1927), made to commemorate the<br />

tenth anniversary of the revolution, fell into a similar category.<br />

They had the feel of documentaries but concentrated on events<br />

rather than individuals. As a result, they are often mistaken even<br />

today as being film ‘records’ of what actually happened in the<br />

1905 and 1917 revolutions rather than re-enactments designed to<br />

serve the interests of the Soviet state in the 1920s. Pudovkin’s End<br />

of St Petersburg (1927), another anniversary classic, paid more<br />

attention to the human elements of the revolutionary struggle, but<br />

here again its message was symbolic and propagandistic rather<br />

than historical. Such films legitimized the revolution and thereby<br />

the regime that inherited it. They appear, however, to have created<br />

a greater impression abroad than they did at home.<br />

Although the Soviets pioneered new methods of domestic propaganda<br />

that were watched with great interest by other countries, it<br />

was their foreign propaganda that caused most concern abroad.<br />

The Bolshevik leadership was certainly quick to appreciate the role<br />

propaganda could play in undermining the position of the ‘capitalistimperialist’<br />

powers and spreading its ideas about world revolution.<br />

In October 1917, for example, the Bolsheviks published various

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!