16.01.2013 Views

Mind-Munitions

Mind-Munitions

Mind-Munitions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The World after 11 September 2001 319<br />

through the media, there was an outcry amongst the press and it<br />

had to be closed down.<br />

In this new battle for hearts and minds, propaganda – however<br />

it is termed – will play a central role, especially if the ‘war’ against<br />

international terrorism lasts for a long time. Many people ask<br />

whether the world has changed since 11 September, but certainly<br />

many aspects of American foreign policy have changed. The identification<br />

of an ‘axis of evil’, the openly declared desire to foster<br />

‘regime change’ in places like Iraq, the determination to ‘hunt down’<br />

terrorists and their supporters, and the renewed emphasis on preventing<br />

‘weapons of mass destruction’ from reaching undesirable<br />

hands may well be understandable reactions to 9/11 but they do<br />

create enormous challenges from a democratic propaganda point<br />

of view. Image and reality must go hand-in-hand if a nation’s<br />

actions are to be perceived in a desired way. Otherwise, the world’s<br />

sole surviving superpower will merely be seen to be wielding what<br />

has become another dirty ‘p’ word, namely power.<br />

In December 2002, American PSYOPS teams began dropping<br />

leaflets on Iraq warning its soldiers not to fire on coalition aircraft.<br />

Commando Solo broadcasts encouraged Iraqi soldiers to desert the<br />

regime of Saddam Hussein. American resolve to destroy the first<br />

target of the ‘axis of evil’ prompted many to question the link<br />

between Iraq and the events of 11 September but the debate over<br />

weapons of mass destruction, and whether Iraq might one day<br />

supply them to al-Qaeda, placed the realm of foreign policy into<br />

the ‘what if?’ category rather than its more traditional pragmatism<br />

for dealing with what had already happened. This makes it even<br />

harder for the propagandists because they are forced to deal with a<br />

world as it might be rather than with constructing justifications for<br />

actions that have already taken place. In such a world, image may<br />

have nothing to do with reality. And in a world where image is<br />

everything, reality has nothing to do with ‘facts’ or ‘the truth’. The<br />

only truth is power.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!