18.01.2013 Views

Performance Report for FY 2009/10 - UWASNET

Performance Report for FY 2009/10 - UWASNET

Performance Report for FY 2009/10 - UWASNET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SN Measurement<br />

Theme<br />

Golden Indicator<br />

<strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>FY</strong> <strong>2009</strong>/<strong>10</strong><br />

7. Equity Mean Sub-County deviation from the district average number<br />

of persons per improved water point. (Mean Sub-County<br />

deviation from the National average number of persons per<br />

improved water point presented here)<br />

8. Handwashing % of people with access to hand-washing facilities.<br />

9. Management % of water points with actively functioning Water & Sanitation<br />

Committees/ Water Supply and Sewerage Boards.<br />

<strong>10</strong>. Gender % of Water User committees/Water Boards with women<br />

holding key positions.<br />

11. Water<br />

Resources<br />

Management<br />

Compliance<br />

% of water abstraction and discharge permits holders<br />

complying with permit conditions<br />

4.2 CSO Contribution to Increased Access to Water<br />

Supplies<br />

NGOs and CBOs have continued to develop improved water sources in both rural and urban<br />

areas thus contributing to improving access 4 to improved water sources.<br />

Table 4.1 presents the number of water sources constructed/rehabilitated and population<br />

served based on the reported estimates of populations served.<br />

Table 4.1 Water sources developed and population served<br />

Activity<br />

Output (No.)<br />

Borehole Constructed<br />

374<br />

Borehole rehabilitated/repaired<br />

285<br />

Shallow well constructed<br />

573<br />

Shallow well rehabilitation 145<br />

Springs protected<br />

155<br />

Spring rehabilitated<br />

55<br />

Piped water schemes constructed 130<br />

Piped water<br />

Tap stands/Kiosks installed 951<br />

House Connections 479<br />

Rainwater Jars constructed 1,216<br />

harvesting Tanks constructed 1,437<br />

Water filters constructed/provided<br />

512<br />

Rural<br />

No of people served*<br />

Urban IDP<br />

174,000<br />

695,000<br />

160,000<br />

26,000<br />

17,000<br />

11,000<br />

156,000<br />

17,000<br />

4,000<br />

17,000<br />

43,000<br />

3,000<br />

1,323,000<br />

-<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

5,000<br />

-<br />

-<br />

18,000<br />

<strong>10</strong>6,000<br />

500,000<br />

2,000<br />

19,000<br />

-<br />

656,000<br />

From Table 4.1 an estimated population of 1.323 million people in rural areas, 0.656 million<br />

from urban areas and 0.002 million from IDP camps were served through CSOs’ interventions.<br />

Of the population served, the rural population constituted 67% while the urban population<br />

4 Access to an improved water supply in rural areas is based on data and calculated at Subcounty level. To calculate<br />

the access figure, the total number of people served by all the improved sources is divided by the total population<br />

-<br />

2,000<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2,000<br />

* Population served estimated to the nearest <strong>10</strong>0th<br />

37 | NGOs in the Ugandan Water and Sanitation Sector<br />

Total<br />

174,000<br />

701,000<br />

162,000<br />

31,000<br />

17,000<br />

11,000<br />

174,000<br />

123,000<br />

504,000<br />

19,000<br />

62,000<br />

3,000<br />

1,981,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!