Performance Report for FY 2009/10 - UWASNET

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Performance Report for FY 2009/10 Institution Key responsibility Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries. Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development. Water, Sanitation and Environment Sector Working Group. Water Policy Committee. Annual GOU/Donor Joint Sector Reviews. MAAIF spearheads agricultural development through its Plan for Modernisation of Agriculture and holds the responsibility for water use management in relation to Water for Production including the onfarm use and management of water for production (irrigation, animal production and aquaculture). The MoU between the MWE and MAAIF defines the shared and separated responsibilities in the field of Water for Production (WfP). MoGLSD is responsible for gender responsiveness and community development/mobilisation. It assists the sector in gender responsive policy development, and supports Districts to build staff capacity to implement sector programmes. The overall coordination of the sector is undertaken by the Water and Sanitation Sector Working Group. The group is chaired by the Permanent Secretary of MWE meets at least every quarter and provides policy and technical guidance for sector development in the country. It comprises representatives from MWE, NWSC, MoH, MoES, MoFPED, DPs and NGOs (represented by UWASNET). Two sub-sector working groups have been established for Water for Production (WfP) and Sanitation . These sub-sector working groups report to the WSSWG The WPC is stipulated in the Water Statute (1995). The membership includes government ministries, and representatives from district local governments, private sector and NGOs. The WPC advises on water policy, standards for service delivery, and priorities for water resources management. The WPC also advises on revisions to legislation and regulations for water resources and also coordinates formulation of international water resources policy. The JSRs are held and have the following objectives: i) Progress and performance of the sector is assessed in relation to 10 key sector performance golden indicators, ii) Agreement is reached on key strategic policy issues, and iii) Guidance is provided for resource allocation and use with particular emphasis on accountability and transparency. JSRs will continue to been held annually with annual Joint Technical Reviews (JTRs) held midway. NGOs in the Ugandan Water and Sanitation Sector | 84
Annex 2 Water and Sanitation NGOs and CBOs Performance Report for FY 2009/10 The table below presents Water and Sanitation NGOs that submitted data, specifying their investment in water and sanitation services and the populations served as well as organisations from which no data was received. This format was introduced in the 2009 Water and Environmental Sector Performance Report to acknowledge the need for NGOs to be more transparent and accountable, and encourage organisations to submit data. 85 | NGOs in the Ugandan Water and Sanitation Sector
Page 1 and 2:
NGOs in the Ugandan Water and Sanit
Page 3 and 4:
NGOs in the Ugandan Water and Sanit
Page 5 and 6:
About UWASNET Performance Report fo
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Performance Repor
Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables Performance Report f
Page 11 and 12:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 13 and 14:
Glossary and definitions Performanc
Page 15 and 16:
Water and Sanitation Development Fa
Page 17 and 18:
Performance Report for FY 2009/10 p
Page 19 and 20:
Supporting Community Based Manageme
Page 21 and 22:
1 Introduction 1.1 Context Performa
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1.2: Classification of repor
Page 25 and 26:
2.2.2 Institutional Framework Perfo
Page 27 and 28:
Sub-Sector Strategies Water for Pro
Page 29 and 30:
Performance Report for FY 2009/10 2
Page 31 and 32:
Performance Report for FY 2009/10 D
Page 33 and 34: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 U
Page 35 and 36: 3.5 Unit costs Performance Report f
Page 37 and 38: SN Measurement Theme Golden Indicat
Page 39 and 40: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 T
Page 41 and 42: 4.4 Per Capita Costs 4.4.1 Per capi
Page 43 and 44: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 4
Page 45 and 46: 4.5.2 Improving the pupil-stance ra
Page 47 and 48: Case Study 4.6 Performance Report f
Page 49 and 50: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 o
Page 51 and 52: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 C
Page 53 and 54: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 b
Page 55 and 56: Case Study 4.12 Pre-paid water mete
Page 57 and 58: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 A
Page 59 and 60: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 L
Page 61 and 62: 4.14 Activities, outputs, and key r
Page 63 and 64: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 T
Page 65 and 66: Case Study 4.18 Ecosan: Farmer’s
Page 67 and 68: Community mobilisation/ Sensitisati
Page 69 and 70: Case Study 4.20 Performance Report
Page 71 and 72: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 i
Page 73 and 74: 6 Challenges and recommendations 6.
Page 75 and 76: Performance Report for FY 2009/10 B
Page 77 and 78: Case Study 6.1 Performance Report f
Page 79 and 80: Performance Report for FY 2009/10
Page 81 and 82: Performance Report for FY 2009/10
Page 83: Institution Key responsibility Dire
Page 87 and 88: Population served Expenditure (UGX)
show all

Performance Report for FY 2009/10 - UWASNET

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?