A Guide to Investing in Trinidad and Tobago (2011) - Ministry of ...
A Guide to Investing in Trinidad and Tobago (2011) - Ministry of ...
A Guide to Investing in Trinidad and Tobago (2011) - Ministry of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• To amalgamate with another company (other<br />
than a short-form amalgamation between companies<br />
which are closely related).<br />
• To sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all <strong>of</strong><br />
its property.<br />
In addition a shareholder has a right <strong>to</strong> dissent where<br />
this is permitted by the court on an application by a<br />
company <strong>to</strong> effect certa<strong>in</strong> arrangements.<br />
Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the fair value<br />
The company is required <strong>to</strong> make an <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>to</strong> a dissent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shareholder <strong>of</strong> an amount which its direc<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
consider <strong>to</strong> be the fair value <strong>of</strong> the shares. If this is<br />
rejected by the shareholder, either party may apply<br />
<strong>to</strong> the court <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the fair value. In determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
fair value, a dissenter is not entitled <strong>to</strong> receive any<br />
advantage from the fundamental change. In Canadian<br />
jurisprudence there are four (4) approved approaches<br />
<strong>to</strong> the valuation <strong>of</strong> shares as follows:<br />
• The s<strong>to</strong>ck market approach - the quoted s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />
market price <strong>of</strong> the shares<br />
• The assets approach - the valuation <strong>of</strong> the assets<br />
<strong>of</strong> the company at fair market value<br />
72 A <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Invest<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>idad <strong>and</strong> <strong>Tobago</strong> (<strong>2011</strong>)<br />
• The earn<strong>in</strong>gs or <strong>in</strong>vestment value approach - the<br />
capitalization <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>able earn<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
• Some comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> above three (3) approaches.<br />
The Canadian courts have established that no s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
approach <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fair value is appropriate for<br />
all circumstances. Rather they have <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />
question is one <strong>of</strong> judgment, fairness <strong>and</strong> equity <strong>to</strong> be<br />
decided on all the circumstances <strong>of</strong> each case. Even<br />
with publicly traded shares, the courts have held that<br />
the s<strong>to</strong>ck market price was not appropriate where<br />
the shares are th<strong>in</strong>ly traded or a substantial block <strong>of</strong><br />
shares is held by a small group <strong>of</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant shareholders.<br />
Obligation <strong>of</strong> the company <strong>to</strong> pay fair value<br />
A company is forbidden <strong>to</strong> make a payment <strong>to</strong> a dissent<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shareholder if there are reasonable grounds<br />
for believ<strong>in</strong>g that the company is, or would after payment,<br />
be unable <strong>to</strong> meet its liabilities after they become<br />
due or the realizable value <strong>of</strong> the company’s<br />
assets would then be less than the aggregate <strong>of</strong> its<br />
liabilities. If the company is unable <strong>to</strong> pay, a dissenter<br />
has two choices:<br />
• He may withdraw the notice <strong>of</strong> dissent, <strong>in</strong> which<br />
case the company is deemed <strong>to</strong> consent <strong>to</strong> withdrawal<br />
<strong>and</strong> the shareholder is re<strong>in</strong>stated <strong>to</strong> his<br />
full status <strong>of</strong> shareholder.<br />
• He may reta<strong>in</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> claimant aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
company <strong>to</strong> be paid as soon as the company is<br />
lawfully able <strong>to</strong> do so. If liquidation follows, his<br />
claim would rank subord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>to</strong> all other credi<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
but <strong>in</strong> priority <strong>to</strong> other shareholders.<br />
Right <strong>to</strong> dissent<br />
The right <strong>of</strong> dissent is vested <strong>in</strong> the registered shareholder<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore a dissent by an unregistered<br />
beneficial owner is a nullity. Additionally, the dissent<br />
must be exercised <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the shares or<br />
all <strong>of</strong> a class <strong>of</strong> shares <strong>in</strong> the name <strong>of</strong> the registered<br />
shareholder. This creates a very serious practical<br />
problem <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> shares which are registered <strong>in</strong><br />
the names <strong>of</strong> trustees, deposi<strong>to</strong>ry agencies, brokerage<br />
firms or other nom<strong>in</strong>ees if some but not all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
beneficial shareholders wish <strong>to</strong> exercise their dissent<br />
rights. The framers <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Act obviously believed<br />
that the advantage <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty outweighs the<br />
practical difficulties which will be faced by nom<strong>in</strong>ees<br />
hold<strong>in</strong>g shares on behalf <strong>of</strong> beneficial owners who<br />
have vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests.<br />
Amalgamation<br />
Provision for company amalgamation<br />
The Companies Act allows two or more companies,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> subsidiary companies <strong>to</strong><br />
be amalgamated <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue as one. Where this<br />
is done these companies become fused or consolidated<br />
as a s<strong>in</strong>gle corporate entity. This fused entity<br />
is entitled <strong>to</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the properties, rights, benefits <strong>and</strong><br />
assets <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the former companies. It is also subject<br />
<strong>to</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the liabilities <strong>and</strong> obligations <strong>of</strong> the former<br />
companies. These provisions are among the most<br />
practical <strong>and</strong> useful features <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act.<br />
Key features <strong>of</strong> amalgamation are that: it avoids the<br />
necessity <strong>and</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> transferr<strong>in</strong>g assets <strong>to</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
entity; <strong>and</strong> pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g contracts rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> place<br />
<strong>and</strong> do not need <strong>to</strong> be assigned.<br />
Amalgamation is therefore a very desirable mechanism<br />
<strong>to</strong> effect the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> conglomerates or