ISMA News - Association Suisse 6mJI
ISMA News - Association Suisse 6mJI
ISMA News - Association Suisse 6mJI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>ISMA</strong> <strong>News</strong> International <strong>6mJI</strong> <strong>Association</strong> Bulletin 1/2004<br />
Commentary from Ian Howlett to the questions of exotic material<br />
This paper has been presented at the AGM 2003 in Saint-Tropez and should be handed over to the technical committee<br />
for eventual changes or clarifying notes in the <strong>6mJI</strong> rules. We present the paper to all our readers:<br />
Introduction<br />
Rule 33 „ Exotic materials etc „ was inherited from the Twelve Metre Class from the days when such was the America’s<br />
Cup Class . In particular in 1970 the 12 Meters had been experimenting with Beryllium clad topmasts that in the memorable<br />
words of Rod Macalpine Downie „ turned deciduous „ . Spreaders were also made using Boron ....<br />
Today materiials such as Carbon Fibre composites could not be regarded as exotic ( used in Tennis Rackets , Golf Clubs<br />
, masts in cruising boats etc etc ) but such would add considerably to the cost of certain items should such be permitted<br />
. By way of illustration the Rig for an Int 5.5m Class Yacht ( which is considerably smaller and lighter ) would cost some<br />
Euro 29K .<br />
Interestingly in 1980 prior to the America’s Cup I obtained written permission from the IYRU to make the mast and the<br />
rigging from Carbon Fibre for Lionheart , but resources did not permit the construction of such - though we did build a<br />
carbon boom and some battens .<br />
I would suggest that the current Rule 33 be eliminated and that we clarify the situation by identifying the materials which<br />
we want to be allowable for the items in question. These interpretations may then be modified in the light of experience<br />
or changing circumstances .<br />
I would suggest that we „ grandfather „ any masts or other spars that that do not conform to the new proposals - though<br />
I am unaware of any such !<br />
Regarding the Spinnaker Pole my researches provided the information that by spending an extra Euro 200 on a carbon<br />
pole 2kg of weight would be saved ......<br />
We already have a weight control ( 12.5Kgs ) on the rudder and the use of composites is the cost effective solution for the<br />
construction of the same .<br />
I propose ......<br />
Old Rule 33 to be deleted in its entirety .<br />
New Rule 33 .. .<br />
The Mast shall be constructed of<br />
1.Wood of any species<br />
2. Normal commercially available aluminium alloys ( ie 5000 or 6000 series ) . Paints , varnishes and fillers for the same<br />
are acceptable and may be used to bring an undersized tube up to Rule dimensions .<br />
‚Solid ‚ shall be interpreted as as of one type of materiial only of approximately constant density .<br />
Spreaders shall be made of timber , aluminium alloy or stainless steel .<br />
The Boom shall be constructed of<br />
1.Wood of any species<br />
2. Normal commercially available aluminium alloys ( ie 5000 or 6000 series ) .<br />
The Spinnaker Pole - may be of any normally available commercial material .<br />
Reinforcements to repair or strenghthen an existing spar that conformed to the Rule may be of any normally commercially<br />
available material and the same shall apply to the hull and deck .<br />
NB ( the purpose of this clause is to allow cost effective repairs/stiffenings to a wooden or metal mast or boom )<br />
Rigging<br />
Shrouds and Forestay shall be of normal commercially available Stainless Steel wire or rods made of materials such as<br />
Nitronic 50 .<br />
Rudder<br />
Any normal commercially available materials may be used for the construction of the rudder ( only constraint is the<br />
minimum weight )<br />
21