Project management and the private finance initiative
Project management and the private finance initiative
Project management and the private finance initiative
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.5 <strong>Project</strong> <strong>management</strong><br />
knowledge <strong>and</strong> expertise<br />
Despite <strong>the</strong> findings from <strong>the</strong> follow-up online survey, <strong>the</strong><br />
interviews showed that building a successful <strong>and</strong> thriving<br />
skills base in appropriate areas is vital if project managers<br />
are to become active in PFI.<br />
Overall <strong>the</strong> research from <strong>the</strong> interviews <strong>and</strong> survey highlighted<br />
(Figure 5.2) a number of important strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses.<br />
The key weaknesses are that:<br />
• The public sector needs people with negotiating <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>management</strong> skills. The public sector also lacks skills in<br />
whole life cycle costing (including FM); construction, financial<br />
modelling, stakeholder <strong>management</strong>, <strong>and</strong> people skills.<br />
Figure 5.2: <strong>Project</strong> <strong>management</strong> / PFI skills balance sheet<br />
Strong<br />
Skills<br />
Weak<br />
Public<br />
sector<br />
• Client underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
• Process underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
• Political skills<br />
• Specialist sector<br />
knowledge (ie healthcare)<br />
• Negotiating skills<br />
• Management skills<br />
• Whole life costing<br />
• Construction skills<br />
• Financial modelling<br />
• Stakeholder <strong>management</strong><br />
• People skills<br />
• The <strong>private</strong> sector needs people with specialist underst<strong>and</strong>ing,<br />
such as those with detailed knowledge of healthcare culture <strong>and</strong><br />
background. Skills are also lacking here in whole life cycle costing<br />
(which includes FM), client underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> people skills.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> strengths were found to be of particular importance:<br />
• The public sector has a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> client than<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>private</strong> sector in terms of underst<strong>and</strong>ing processes, chains<br />
of comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> decision-making processes.<br />
• The public sector is more adept in political skills than <strong>the</strong> <strong>private</strong> sector.<br />
• The <strong>private</strong> sector has more specialist expertise in terms of financial<br />
modelling, technical <strong>and</strong> legal advice than <strong>the</strong> public sector.<br />
• The <strong>private</strong> sector’s strength is also <strong>the</strong>ir experience <strong>and</strong><br />
familiarity with construction <strong>and</strong> PFI.<br />
Private<br />
sector<br />
• PFI experience<br />
• Construction experience<br />
• Financial modelling<br />
• Technical advice<br />
• Legal advice<br />
• Risk appreciation<br />
• Specialist sector<br />
knowledge (ie healthcare)<br />
• Whole life costing<br />
• Client underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
• People skills<br />
+ve<br />
-ve<br />
<strong>Project</strong> <strong>management</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>private</strong> <strong>finance</strong> <strong>initiative</strong> chapter five Conclusions <strong>and</strong> recommendations<br />
32