30.01.2013 Views

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences – Volume 5, Number 3 (2007)<br />

if innovations that are perceived by individuals have greater relative advantage, compatibility,<br />

trialability, observability, and less complexity, they will be adopted more rapidly than other<br />

innovations. Hence, computer characteristics are very important to the adoption/implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

computers.<br />

On the other hand, the construct <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> norms can be important in transferring technology<br />

from developed to developing countries (Thomas, 1987). Then, acceptance <strong>of</strong> a new technology in a<br />

society depends on how well the proposed innovation fits the existing culture. In addition, the diffusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> technologies may be inhibited by the micro culture <strong>of</strong> a certain institution or organization. Hence,<br />

there must be a match between organizational culture and new technology into an organization (Hodas,<br />

1993). Within the school organization, if the technology is not well received by principals, there will<br />

be a mismatch <strong>of</strong> values between the culture <strong>of</strong> schools and the technology.<br />

In addition, the success <strong>of</strong> educational innovations depends largely on skill and knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

teachers and principals. Knezek and Christensen (2002) found that competence in computer technology<br />

influence on effective use <strong>of</strong> computer. Hence, knowledge <strong>of</strong> computer hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware is<br />

important for principals. According to Creighton (2001), the identification <strong>of</strong> the principals’ task that<br />

they want to accomplish will determine the type <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware needed. Therefore, principals must decide<br />

what administrative and instructional functions they want to perform with computers before making<br />

purchases. On the other hand, access to computer resources has <strong>of</strong>ten been one <strong>of</strong> the most important<br />

barriers for the integration <strong>of</strong> technology in both developed and developing countries (Albrini, 2006).<br />

Hence, sufficient technology infrastructure must be available in order to use technology successfully<br />

(Becker et al., 1999).<br />

Rogers (1995) stated that individuals’ characteristics and the nature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>social</strong> system<br />

influence the adoption <strong>of</strong> an innovation. Several studies reported a relationship between principals’<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles and level <strong>of</strong> computer use. For example, Schiller (2003) studied about age, gender and years <strong>of</strong><br />

experience in his selected characteristics <strong>of</strong> principals and found that principals below the age <strong>of</strong> 50 use<br />

computers more than principals over the age <strong>of</strong> 50. Also, he reported that there were statistically<br />

significant differences between male and female principals in the use <strong>of</strong> computer at home and school.<br />

The factor that empowers the people and ultimately determines which organizations succeed or<br />

fail is the leadership <strong>of</strong> those organizations (Bennis, 1990). However, it is important to mention that<br />

leadership is only one aspect <strong>of</strong> a very complex process <strong>of</strong> technological innovation (Stone, 1994). On<br />

this matter, according to Jung et al. (2003), a wide range <strong>of</strong> factors has been found to affect<br />

organizational innovation. Of these, managers’ leadership style has been identified as being one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most important variables. Yet, few studies have empirically examined the link between this factor and<br />

utilization <strong>of</strong> technology at the school level. In this paper, a short literature overview is given on the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> transformational leadership style and the role that it plays in implementing ICT at school.<br />

4. Transformational Leadership<br />

The pace <strong>of</strong> change confronting organizations today has resulted in calls for more adaptive, flexible<br />

leadership. Adaptive leaders work more effectively in rapidly changing environments by helping to<br />

make sense <strong>of</strong> the challenges confronted by both leaders and followers and then appropriately<br />

responding to those challenges (Bass et al.,2003). In other words, such leaders are influential in<br />

approving or disapproving new ideas. They play an important role in the diffusion and adoption <strong>of</strong><br />

innovations (Malioukis et al., 2007). According to Rogers (1995), it is impossible to ignore opinion<br />

leaders in studying the spread <strong>of</strong> ideas. If opinion leaders are to be widely recognized as experts on<br />

innovations, it is likely that they adopt new ideas before their followers. Therefore, leaders must be<br />

more innovative than their followers. Also, they must be able to communicate with their followers and<br />

have high rapport with them.<br />

Adaptive leaders work with their followers to generate creative solutions to complex problems,<br />

while also developing them to handle a broader range <strong>of</strong> leadership responsibilities (Bennis, 2001).<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!