European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences – Volume 5, Number 3 (2007) [61] Tiede, L. J. (1992). A study <strong>of</strong> selected elementary school principals' use <strong>of</strong> computers for administrative purposes. (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(06A), 1760. (UMI No. AAG9230727). [62] Thomas, R.M., (1987). Computer technology: an example <strong>of</strong> decision-making in technology transfer. In R. M. Thomas & V. N. Kobayashi (Eds.), Educational Technology—Its Creation, Development and Cross-Cultural Transfer (pp.25-34). Oxford: Pergamon Press [63] Wolf, R.,(1993). The role <strong>of</strong> the school principal in computer education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19:167-183 118
European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences – Volume 5, Number 3 (2007) Comparative Study on Performance <strong>of</strong> Single Pass, Double Duct Photovoltaic Thermal Collector with and without CPC Ebrahim M. Ali Alfegi Solar Energy Research Institute, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia E-mail: alfegi@vlsi.eng.ukm.my Kamaruzzaman Sopian Solar Energy Research Institute, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Mohd Yus<strong>of</strong> Hj Othman Solar Energy Research Institute, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Baharudin Bin Yatim Solar Energy Research Institute, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Engineering University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Abstract This paper presents comparative results <strong>of</strong> experimental investigations <strong>of</strong> the photovoltaic, thermal, and combined photovoltaic thermal performance <strong>of</strong> two solar air collectors. The first collector uses Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CPC) and fins; and the second collector uses only fins without (CPC). Two complete collectors test facilities, operating in the same conditions, equipped with a data acquisition system, have been assembled and tested for comparing their efficiencies. Tests are performed under various parameters such as minimum and maximum solar intensities, ranging from 400 to 700 W/m 2 , inlet temperature ranging between 30 to 35 Cº, and mass flow rate ranging from 0.0316 kg/s to 0.09 kg/s. The comparative results show an average combined performance <strong>of</strong> 63.65 % for the two collectors when the air mass flow rate reaches 0.09 kg/s. The combined efficiency <strong>of</strong> the collector with CPC is 65.206 % at mass flow rate 0.09 kg/s, solar intensity <strong>of</strong> 700 W/m 2 , and inlet temperature <strong>of</strong> 30 Cº, while its 62.093 % for the collector with out CPC. The results show that the collector coupled with CPC is performs better for both thermal and electrical output <strong>of</strong> the hybrid PV/T. Keywords: Hybrid PV/T collector, both sides single-pass, CPC, Fin, combined efficiency. Introduction Solar energy is one <strong>of</strong> the most important source <strong>of</strong> renewable energy that world needs. The major applications <strong>of</strong> solar energy can be classified into two categories, Thermal system (T) and Photovoltaic system (PV) cell. Normally, these systems are used separately. In conventional solar thermal system, external electrical energy is required to circulate the working fluid through the system. In conventional photovoltaic system, high incident solar radiation on (PV) panel should give high electrical output. 119