30.01.2013 Views

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

european journal of social sciences issn: 1450-2267 - EuroJournals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

European Journal <strong>of</strong> Social Sciences – Volume 5, Number 3 (2007)<br />

two identities emerges. While the ‘overt’ identity lacks inner expression, the covert ‘identity’ lacks any<br />

way <strong>of</strong> outer expression. Different psychological theories address the issue <strong>of</strong> presented selves or<br />

<strong>social</strong> selves as opposed to inner personal selves (among them: G<strong>of</strong>fman, 1959; James, 1890 Rosaldo<br />

,1985; D'andrade, 1985; Jones, 1964; 1981; Jones & Pittman, 1982; Schlenker, 1980) . “Properly<br />

speaking,” says James, (1890: 294), “a man has as many <strong>social</strong> selves as there are individuals who<br />

recognize him and carry an image <strong>of</strong> him in their mind”. Seemingly, similarity can be seen between<br />

these psychological theories and the aspects <strong>of</strong> identity expressed by the interviewees. But while Jones<br />

& Pittman, (1982) and Schlenker (1980) describe mutual influences and relationships existing between<br />

the personal inner self and the expressed <strong>social</strong> self in theories, these mutual relations do not appear in<br />

the citations above, nor in the other citations.<br />

Another fundamental difference is the freedom to express and create the different selves.<br />

Although the theories <strong>of</strong> Jones Pittman (1982) and Schlenker (1980) do not refer to the <strong>social</strong> necessity<br />

or obligation to express the external ‘overt’ presentation <strong>of</strong> the self, the Druze women accentuate their<br />

obligation to conceal their inner selves, and the <strong>social</strong> sanctions that would be applied if they expressed<br />

their covert-concealed self influenced by Western individualistic norms. The interviewees accentuate<br />

the dissociation between the two identities, each presenting different cultural norms and values, and the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> ability to present their inner feelings and values. These two dissociated aspects <strong>of</strong> identity<br />

influenced by East and West, by tradition and modernity, were apparent in the narratives, in addition to<br />

the accompanying pain and hybridity.<br />

Integration and Conflict in Identity<br />

In the narratives displayed in former sections, the traditional Druze norms were articulated by the<br />

‘overt’ identity, and Western influences by the ‘covert’ identity, and a gap was described as existing<br />

between the two. Although many <strong>of</strong> the narratives described the two aspects <strong>of</strong> identity as dissociated,<br />

further analysis reveals that both cultures have apparently exerted a pr<strong>of</strong>ound influence on the inner,<br />

covert identity and have caused intrapersonal conflicts.<br />

Nawal, who first describes her behavior as originating from <strong>social</strong> necessity, talks about<br />

internal conflicts that are not only affected by Western values and norms, but are influenced by both<br />

Western and traditional values and prohibitions:<br />

There will always be one side and an opposing side…. For example, women are not allowed to<br />

swim! Why? No one even gives you an explanation! It’s forbidden! If I go swimming in a bathing suit<br />

I feel like I’ve sinned. But my brain and logic say it is not a sin, not an <strong>of</strong>fense! Nevertheless, the way I<br />

was raised constantly influences and affects me … Somehow, one is always in a state <strong>of</strong> dilemma and<br />

inner conflict <strong>of</strong> one side contrasting with the other, with yourself in the middle. (Nawal).<br />

The conflict is not limited to the dichotomy between individual will and collective norms or<br />

between ‘covert’ and ‘overt’ identities. The two worlds Nawal is torn between are reflected in the dual<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> her inner, ‘covert’ identity: Her relationship with the secular and Western world is<br />

represented by cognition, and applied by her intellect or brain, while her affinity to the traditional<br />

world is implied by emotion. This portrayal <strong>of</strong> the two cultures integrated in her identity adds a new<br />

dimension to theoretical discussion <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> different cultures on identity. Not only does the<br />

dominance or supremacy <strong>of</strong> each culture vary (within identity) but these cultures also reflect separate<br />

entities in the different components there<strong>of</strong>, i.e., the cognitive vs. the emotional.<br />

Hanan describes her inner conflicts stemming from the two cultures to which she was exposed,<br />

each in a different way, by using a metaphor which emphasizes the difficulty and pain:<br />

A single woman who has studied has many arguments with herself. There is even a stage <strong>of</strong><br />

being split between keeping what I have, what I received from my childhood and tradition, and<br />

between the outside world, the contact with modernity outside. The argument is not only between me<br />

and my husband, between me and my friends, but also within myself;(…) Do you understand, it’s a<br />

long process, I still have many limitations. I want to fly, but I want to be attached with a thread; I can't<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!