This Issue - Icwai
This Issue - Icwai
This Issue - Icwai
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
What is Impairment<br />
IAS 36 impairment is a process of continuous<br />
revaluation of assets to account for any loss or gain in<br />
the value of an asset where carrying amount of an<br />
asset in the books of account is greater than its<br />
recoverable amount.<br />
Impairment When<br />
= Carrying Amount of Asset > than recoverable<br />
amount and impairment loss taken in books of<br />
account.<br />
Recoverable Amount for individual Asset or Cash<br />
GeneratingUnit = Greater of<br />
▲<br />
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING<br />
ACCOUNTING<br />
ACCOUNTING<br />
▲<br />
Value in Use Fair Value less Cost to Sell<br />
The rationale behind taking the higher of the Value<br />
in use or Fair Value less cost to sell is likely the<br />
economic value of the asset. An making rational<br />
choices would sell an Asset if the Fair Value less Cost<br />
to Sell is more than Value in Use and would continue<br />
to use the asset if Value in use if greater than Fair<br />
Value less cost to sell.The economic value of the Asset<br />
is meaning fully represented with reference to higher<br />
of the above since the entity will either dispose or use<br />
the asset based on what appears highest and best in<br />
use.<br />
Impairment Test on Whom<br />
INDIVIDUAL ASSETS/CASH GENERATING<br />
UNITS(CGU)—The recoverable is calculated for<br />
individual Assets. However, if the Asset does not<br />
generate cash inflows that is largely independent of<br />
those from other Assets the recoverable is calculated<br />
for the Cash Generating Unit to which the Asset<br />
belongs.<br />
Cash Generating Units is the smallest identifiable<br />
group of assets that generate cash inflows that are<br />
largely independent of the cash inflows from other<br />
assets or group of Assets.<br />
Value in Use<br />
Value in Use = PV of future Cash Flows expected<br />
from the Asset or CGU. As PV is to be calculated we<br />
have two variables 1) Discount Rate 2) Cash Flows.<br />
Cash Flow represents the future cash flows the entity<br />
expects from the Asset/CGU and expectation about<br />
possible variations in the amount and timing of the<br />
cash flows. It should represent —<br />
1. Management’s best estimate of the set of<br />
economic conditions of the asset over its life.<br />
2. Should be based on management assets of<br />
current Budget,Cash flows, forecasts approved by<br />
the management, any action like restructuring where<br />
final decision is pending with the management should<br />
not be factored in estimating the cash flows.<br />
3. Should exclude borrowing costs, income tax<br />
receipts or payments etc.<br />
4. IAS 36 required that the previous estimates needs<br />
to be compared with the actual cash flows as part of<br />
establishing the reasonableness of the estimates/<br />
assumptions.<br />
Discount Rate—Normally the PreTax discount rate<br />
is representative of the time value of money and risks<br />
associated with the asset for which the future cash<br />
flows have not been adjusted.<br />
A Present Value can be calculated either by<br />
‘Traditional’ or “Expected Cash Flow” Methodology.<br />
Under Traditional method a single set of Cash flows and<br />
a commensurate discount rate is used and the discount<br />
rate also factoring in the Risk. The Expected Cash Flows<br />
different Probabilities are assigned to different<br />
expected cash flows in different scenarios and the PV is<br />
calculated on the expected outcomes based on the<br />
probabilities and expected cash flows. As also<br />
indicated in IAS36, Expected Cash Flows, in many cases<br />
gives a more effective tool than the Traditional method.<br />
The calculation of the Value is subject to variables<br />
and is not standardised which may lead lack of<br />
congruity of the financial statement—the primary<br />
objective of any standard.<strong>This</strong> means that companies,<br />
though applying the same standards, may not be<br />
calculating the valuation approaches or discount rate<br />
in the same way. For example, Probabilities assigned<br />
for different scenarios in calculating the Expected<br />
Cash Flow may be different in two different comparable<br />
companies leading to different standards of<br />
impairment test being adopted by the companies.<strong>This</strong><br />
needs attention and a process needs to be standardised<br />
and valuation standards established. International<br />
Valuation Standards Council (IVSC) develops and<br />
maintains the standards for reporting the valuation<br />
and disclosure of valuations. Valuation Standards<br />
exist in many countries but an effort is urgently<br />
required for converging the valuation standards<br />
similar to that of IFRS.<br />
However, in the present day scenario, the<br />
Management, for calculating the value in use, needs<br />
to integrate its decision making process into other<br />
business processes and should not keep an isolated<br />
exercise only for arriving at the impairment.<br />
Fair Value less Cost to Sell<br />
Amount obtainable from sale of asset in an Arms<br />
Length transaction between knowledgeable and<br />
willing parties less cost to sell —<br />
1. The Best evidence of Fair Value is a price in a<br />
778 The Management Accountant |September 2011