02.02.2013 Views

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What is Impairment<br />

IAS 36 impairment is a process of continuous<br />

revaluation of assets to account for any loss or gain in<br />

the value of an asset where carrying amount of an<br />

asset in the books of account is greater than its<br />

recoverable amount.<br />

Impairment When<br />

= Carrying Amount of Asset > than recoverable<br />

amount and impairment loss taken in books of<br />

account.<br />

Recoverable Amount for individual Asset or Cash<br />

GeneratingUnit = Greater of<br />

▲<br />

FINANCIAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING<br />

ACCOUNTING<br />

ACCOUNTING<br />

▲<br />

Value in Use Fair Value less Cost to Sell<br />

The rationale behind taking the higher of the Value<br />

in use or Fair Value less cost to sell is likely the<br />

economic value of the asset. An making rational<br />

choices would sell an Asset if the Fair Value less Cost<br />

to Sell is more than Value in Use and would continue<br />

to use the asset if Value in use if greater than Fair<br />

Value less cost to sell.The economic value of the Asset<br />

is meaning fully represented with reference to higher<br />

of the above since the entity will either dispose or use<br />

the asset based on what appears highest and best in<br />

use.<br />

Impairment Test on Whom<br />

INDIVIDUAL ASSETS/CASH GENERATING<br />

UNITS(CGU)—The recoverable is calculated for<br />

individual Assets. However, if the Asset does not<br />

generate cash inflows that is largely independent of<br />

those from other Assets the recoverable is calculated<br />

for the Cash Generating Unit to which the Asset<br />

belongs.<br />

Cash Generating Units is the smallest identifiable<br />

group of assets that generate cash inflows that are<br />

largely independent of the cash inflows from other<br />

assets or group of Assets.<br />

Value in Use<br />

Value in Use = PV of future Cash Flows expected<br />

from the Asset or CGU. As PV is to be calculated we<br />

have two variables 1) Discount Rate 2) Cash Flows.<br />

Cash Flow represents the future cash flows the entity<br />

expects from the Asset/CGU and expectation about<br />

possible variations in the amount and timing of the<br />

cash flows. It should represent —<br />

1. Management’s best estimate of the set of<br />

economic conditions of the asset over its life.<br />

2. Should be based on management assets of<br />

current Budget,Cash flows, forecasts approved by<br />

the management, any action like restructuring where<br />

final decision is pending with the management should<br />

not be factored in estimating the cash flows.<br />

3. Should exclude borrowing costs, income tax<br />

receipts or payments etc.<br />

4. IAS 36 required that the previous estimates needs<br />

to be compared with the actual cash flows as part of<br />

establishing the reasonableness of the estimates/<br />

assumptions.<br />

Discount Rate—Normally the PreTax discount rate<br />

is representative of the time value of money and risks<br />

associated with the asset for which the future cash<br />

flows have not been adjusted.<br />

A Present Value can be calculated either by<br />

‘Traditional’ or “Expected Cash Flow” Methodology.<br />

Under Traditional method a single set of Cash flows and<br />

a commensurate discount rate is used and the discount<br />

rate also factoring in the Risk. The Expected Cash Flows<br />

different Probabilities are assigned to different<br />

expected cash flows in different scenarios and the PV is<br />

calculated on the expected outcomes based on the<br />

probabilities and expected cash flows. As also<br />

indicated in IAS36, Expected Cash Flows, in many cases<br />

gives a more effective tool than the Traditional method.<br />

The calculation of the Value is subject to variables<br />

and is not standardised which may lead lack of<br />

congruity of the financial statement—the primary<br />

objective of any standard.<strong>This</strong> means that companies,<br />

though applying the same standards, may not be<br />

calculating the valuation approaches or discount rate<br />

in the same way. For example, Probabilities assigned<br />

for different scenarios in calculating the Expected<br />

Cash Flow may be different in two different comparable<br />

companies leading to different standards of<br />

impairment test being adopted by the companies.<strong>This</strong><br />

needs attention and a process needs to be standardised<br />

and valuation standards established. International<br />

Valuation Standards Council (IVSC) develops and<br />

maintains the standards for reporting the valuation<br />

and disclosure of valuations. Valuation Standards<br />

exist in many countries but an effort is urgently<br />

required for converging the valuation standards<br />

similar to that of IFRS.<br />

However, in the present day scenario, the<br />

Management, for calculating the value in use, needs<br />

to integrate its decision making process into other<br />

business processes and should not keep an isolated<br />

exercise only for arriving at the impairment.<br />

Fair Value less Cost to Sell<br />

Amount obtainable from sale of asset in an Arms<br />

Length transaction between knowledgeable and<br />

willing parties less cost to sell —<br />

1. The Best evidence of Fair Value is a price in a<br />

778 The Management Accountant |September 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!