02.02.2013 Views

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINANCIAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING<br />

ACCOUNTING<br />

binding agreement at an arm’s length transaction less<br />

cost to sell.<br />

2. If no binding agreement exists then the estimate.<br />

should be based on Asset Prices in an active market<br />

less cost of disposal.<br />

3. If both are not available it is based on the Best<br />

Estimate available on what will be the realisations<br />

from the asset at the end of the reporting period less<br />

cost to sell.<br />

4. If market price is not available then Discounted<br />

Cash Flow can be used for calculating the Fair value.<br />

Treatment of Impairment Loss in Accounts<br />

1. For non-revalued assets<br />

* impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss.<br />

2. For revalued assets<br />

* impairment loss is recognized in other<br />

comprehensive incomes reducing the revaluation<br />

surplus for that Asset.If the Impairment Loss exceeds<br />

the Revaluation Surplus the remaining loss is<br />

recognised as an expense in the Profit & Loss Account.<br />

3. Carrying amount is reduced to recoverable amount<br />

* recoverable amount becomes new carrying amount.<br />

* depreciation will be adjusted based on new<br />

carrying amount.<br />

However, the Standard does not give any direction<br />

whether the Impairment is to be credited to the Asset<br />

A/c directly or added to Accumulated Depreciation<br />

or Treated as a depreciation in Balance Sheet<br />

separately depicted and reduced from asset there.<br />

For assets carried at historical cost, impairment<br />

losses are recognised as an expense immediately in<br />

profit or loss. If the impaired asset is a revalued asset<br />

under IAS 16 or IAS 38, the impairment loss is treated<br />

as a revaluation decrease and recognised directly in<br />

other comprehensive incomes reducing the revaluation<br />

surplus for that asset. To the extent the impairment loss<br />

exceeds the revaluation surplus it is charged in PL.<br />

Corporate Assets<br />

Corporate Assets indicate Head Quarters Building,<br />

Equipments which do not generate any Cash<br />

Flows by itself but needs to be tested for impairment<br />

as per IAS 36, otherwise these Assets will not be tested<br />

for impairment and also give a way out to companies<br />

to bypass the impairment testing. IAS 36 requires<br />

that the Corporate Assets need to allocated to the Cash<br />

Generating Units to which it is most closely associated.<br />

The most logical approach seems to allocate<br />

Corporate Assets on the basis of some objective<br />

criteria like Turnover, Unit Cash flow etc.<br />

Impairment of Goodwill<br />

Goodwill can primarily take two forms: purchased<br />

goodwill and internally-generated goodwill. Under<br />

IFRS 3 and, IFRS 10, internally-generated goodwill<br />

cannot be capitalised. Goodwill as per IAS 36 is to<br />

be tested for impairment once in a year whether<br />

impairment indicators exist or not.<br />

Goodwill of the acquirer is allocated to the CGU<br />

or group of CGU which is effected by the synergies of<br />

the acquisition—whether the assets and liabilities<br />

acquired are transferred or allocated to that CGU/<br />

Group of CGU or not. The Goodwill to be allocated<br />

for impairment Testing to a CGU or a Group of CGU<br />

but the Group of CGU cannot be larger than<br />

“operating Segments” as defined inIFRS8 . If goodwill<br />

has not been allocated to individual CGUs, as is often<br />

the case, but is monitored at a higher level, a twostage<br />

impairment test is required.<br />

Firstly, impairment testing is performed at<br />

individual CGU level, comparing individual CGU<br />

recoverable amounts with the assets that have been<br />

directly allocated to the CGU (for example, a retail<br />

store for a retailer). Any impairment identified at this<br />

level is allocated to the fixed assets being tested.<br />

Secondly, the recoverable amount of the group of<br />

CGUs to which goodwill relates is compared with all<br />

of the assets of those CGUs plus the goodwill. At this<br />

second stage, any impairment is charged against<br />

goodwill until that is exhausted.<br />

When a CGU, or group of CGUs, to which goodwill<br />

is allocated is tested for impairment, any impairment<br />

loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of<br />

the goodwill. The remaining loss (if any) is then<br />

allocated to other assets of the CGU pro rata on the basis<br />

of the carrying amount of each asset in the CGU.<br />

However, in this process, the carrying amount of an<br />

asset will never be reduced below the higher of its<br />

individual recoverable amount and zero.<br />

Example for Goodwill Impairment<br />

ABC takes over 80% of XYZ Ltd on 1 May 2009<br />

Price paid by ABC Rs. 200,000<br />

Net Assets of XYZ is Rs. 150,000<br />

80% of Assets Rs.120,000 for which price paid is<br />

Rs. 200,000 ie Rs. 80,000 has been paid for Goodwill.<br />

ABC allocates Rs 100,000 Goodwill to XYZ Ltd and<br />

balance is allocated to other CGU having synergistic<br />

benefit from the takeover.<br />

On March 31, 2010, ABC Tests Goodwill for<br />

Impairment as required by Standards.<br />

The Recoverable value of XYZ as on 31, 2010, was<br />

Rs 90,000 and its Net Assets excluding Goodwill was<br />

Rs 130,000.<br />

Carrying Amount as on 31 March 100,000 + 130,000<br />

= 230,000. Notional Goodwill for unrecognised<br />

The Management Accountant |September 2011 779

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!