This Issue - Icwai
This Issue - Icwai
This Issue - Icwai
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING<br />
ACCOUNTING<br />
binding agreement at an arm’s length transaction less<br />
cost to sell.<br />
2. If no binding agreement exists then the estimate.<br />
should be based on Asset Prices in an active market<br />
less cost of disposal.<br />
3. If both are not available it is based on the Best<br />
Estimate available on what will be the realisations<br />
from the asset at the end of the reporting period less<br />
cost to sell.<br />
4. If market price is not available then Discounted<br />
Cash Flow can be used for calculating the Fair value.<br />
Treatment of Impairment Loss in Accounts<br />
1. For non-revalued assets<br />
* impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss.<br />
2. For revalued assets<br />
* impairment loss is recognized in other<br />
comprehensive incomes reducing the revaluation<br />
surplus for that Asset.If the Impairment Loss exceeds<br />
the Revaluation Surplus the remaining loss is<br />
recognised as an expense in the Profit & Loss Account.<br />
3. Carrying amount is reduced to recoverable amount<br />
* recoverable amount becomes new carrying amount.<br />
* depreciation will be adjusted based on new<br />
carrying amount.<br />
However, the Standard does not give any direction<br />
whether the Impairment is to be credited to the Asset<br />
A/c directly or added to Accumulated Depreciation<br />
or Treated as a depreciation in Balance Sheet<br />
separately depicted and reduced from asset there.<br />
For assets carried at historical cost, impairment<br />
losses are recognised as an expense immediately in<br />
profit or loss. If the impaired asset is a revalued asset<br />
under IAS 16 or IAS 38, the impairment loss is treated<br />
as a revaluation decrease and recognised directly in<br />
other comprehensive incomes reducing the revaluation<br />
surplus for that asset. To the extent the impairment loss<br />
exceeds the revaluation surplus it is charged in PL.<br />
Corporate Assets<br />
Corporate Assets indicate Head Quarters Building,<br />
Equipments which do not generate any Cash<br />
Flows by itself but needs to be tested for impairment<br />
as per IAS 36, otherwise these Assets will not be tested<br />
for impairment and also give a way out to companies<br />
to bypass the impairment testing. IAS 36 requires<br />
that the Corporate Assets need to allocated to the Cash<br />
Generating Units to which it is most closely associated.<br />
The most logical approach seems to allocate<br />
Corporate Assets on the basis of some objective<br />
criteria like Turnover, Unit Cash flow etc.<br />
Impairment of Goodwill<br />
Goodwill can primarily take two forms: purchased<br />
goodwill and internally-generated goodwill. Under<br />
IFRS 3 and, IFRS 10, internally-generated goodwill<br />
cannot be capitalised. Goodwill as per IAS 36 is to<br />
be tested for impairment once in a year whether<br />
impairment indicators exist or not.<br />
Goodwill of the acquirer is allocated to the CGU<br />
or group of CGU which is effected by the synergies of<br />
the acquisition—whether the assets and liabilities<br />
acquired are transferred or allocated to that CGU/<br />
Group of CGU or not. The Goodwill to be allocated<br />
for impairment Testing to a CGU or a Group of CGU<br />
but the Group of CGU cannot be larger than<br />
“operating Segments” as defined inIFRS8 . If goodwill<br />
has not been allocated to individual CGUs, as is often<br />
the case, but is monitored at a higher level, a twostage<br />
impairment test is required.<br />
Firstly, impairment testing is performed at<br />
individual CGU level, comparing individual CGU<br />
recoverable amounts with the assets that have been<br />
directly allocated to the CGU (for example, a retail<br />
store for a retailer). Any impairment identified at this<br />
level is allocated to the fixed assets being tested.<br />
Secondly, the recoverable amount of the group of<br />
CGUs to which goodwill relates is compared with all<br />
of the assets of those CGUs plus the goodwill. At this<br />
second stage, any impairment is charged against<br />
goodwill until that is exhausted.<br />
When a CGU, or group of CGUs, to which goodwill<br />
is allocated is tested for impairment, any impairment<br />
loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of<br />
the goodwill. The remaining loss (if any) is then<br />
allocated to other assets of the CGU pro rata on the basis<br />
of the carrying amount of each asset in the CGU.<br />
However, in this process, the carrying amount of an<br />
asset will never be reduced below the higher of its<br />
individual recoverable amount and zero.<br />
Example for Goodwill Impairment<br />
ABC takes over 80% of XYZ Ltd on 1 May 2009<br />
Price paid by ABC Rs. 200,000<br />
Net Assets of XYZ is Rs. 150,000<br />
80% of Assets Rs.120,000 for which price paid is<br />
Rs. 200,000 ie Rs. 80,000 has been paid for Goodwill.<br />
ABC allocates Rs 100,000 Goodwill to XYZ Ltd and<br />
balance is allocated to other CGU having synergistic<br />
benefit from the takeover.<br />
On March 31, 2010, ABC Tests Goodwill for<br />
Impairment as required by Standards.<br />
The Recoverable value of XYZ as on 31, 2010, was<br />
Rs 90,000 and its Net Assets excluding Goodwill was<br />
Rs 130,000.<br />
Carrying Amount as on 31 March 100,000 + 130,000<br />
= 230,000. Notional Goodwill for unrecognised<br />
The Management Accountant |September 2011 779