02.02.2013 Views

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

This Issue - Icwai

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

FINANCIAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

Industrial Sickness in India : Magnitude and<br />

Intensity<br />

Growing incidence of industrial sickness in the<br />

small, medium and large scale sectors has<br />

become the cause of considerable concern for<br />

all quarters. Incidence of industrial sickness is no<br />

doubt a global phenomenon. But then, can our country<br />

accept such a situation? Developed country’s economy<br />

has the resilience to absorb the economic imbalance<br />

brought about by the closure of industrial units. The<br />

problem of industrial sickness has, however, adverse<br />

repercussion on the economy of our country as it can<br />

neither afford unemployment nor loss of production<br />

by keeping the capital assets idle. With opening up<br />

of Indian economy in the global market, Indian<br />

industries have been finding it very difficult<br />

to compete under the changed environment.<br />

Globalization—which is the centrepiece of process of<br />

change in the 1990s followed by liberalization and<br />

privatization—led the Indian industries to much<br />

better interdependence in the world economy.<br />

Process of globalisation has provided tremendous<br />

opportunities to the Indian industries with respect to<br />

trade, inflow of foreign investment, technology, skills,<br />

and market access. On the other hand, however, it<br />

has pushed Indian industries to greater risk of being<br />

marginalized as they may not be able to integrate fully<br />

into the global economy and enjoy its benefits. In such<br />

a situation, one needs to assess the actual magnitude<br />

and economic impact of sickness in Indian manufacturing<br />

industries.<br />

Objective<br />

The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive<br />

assessment of actual magnitude of industrial<br />

sickness on the basis of official data available from<br />

the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Board for<br />

Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). Statewise<br />

and industry-wise distribution of industrial<br />

Dilip Kumar Datta*<br />

sickness as reflected from the BIFR data has also been<br />

described in this paper, besides constructing an index<br />

of intensity of sickness for making a comparative<br />

analysis.<br />

Magnitude of Industrial Sickness<br />

According to the Reserve Bank of India, the total<br />

number of sick industrial units in this country was<br />

24,550 in 1980-81. By the end of 2002-03, the number<br />

of sick units has increased to 1,71,376; thus, over a<br />

period of twentytwo years, the number of sick<br />

industrial units has increased, on year-on-year basis,<br />

by 12.49% per year; the compound growth rate is<br />

calculated to be about 9.23% (Table 1). During this<br />

period, the total amount of blocked bank credit (WPI<br />

adjusted) increased from Rs. 1,809 crores to<br />

Rs. 8,418.30 crores. Table 1 indicates that the real (WPI<br />

adjusted) non-performing bank credit blocked by the<br />

sick units increased at a rate of 7.90% per year (the<br />

compound growth rate is 7.24%), which is higher than<br />

the average growth rate of the GDP of this country<br />

during this period. In terms of numbers, the smallscale<br />

industrial (SSI) units account for 98.79% of the<br />

sick industrial units. Out of 1,71,376 sick industrial<br />

units, number of SSI units had been as high as 1,67,980<br />

in 2002-03. In terms of growth also, the number of<br />

sick SSI units outperformed the Non-SSI units. Over<br />

the last two decades, the number of sick SSI units,<br />

increased at the rate of 12.86% on year-on-year basis;<br />

the Non-SSI units on the other hand, increased only<br />

at the rate of 4.27% per year. The other noteworthy<br />

feature is that the fluctuation in the number of sick<br />

SSI units had been much higher than that of the Non-<br />

SSI units—a fact reflected in a higher value of<br />

coefficient of variation in the time series data on the<br />

number of SSI units, as reported in Table 1.<br />

* M. Tech, MBA, Ph.D., Director & CEO, Sayantan<br />

Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata<br />

782 The Management Accountant |September 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!