Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler

and shortest communication is excluded, the necessity of a connecting organization arises:
thus, the ideal condition is ended and is replaced by the necessary evil of organization. Little
sub-groups are formed which in the political movement, for example, call themselves local
groups and constitute the germ-cells of the future organization.
If the unity of the doctrine is not to be lost, however, this subdivision must not take place
until the authority of the spiritual founder and of the school trained by him can be regarded
as unconditional. The geo-political significance of a focal center in a movement cannot be
overemphasized. Only the presence of such a place, exerting the magic spell of a Mecca or a
Rome, can in the long run give the movement a force which is based on inner unity and the
recognition of a summit representing this unity.
Thus, in forming the first organizational germ-cells we must never lose sight of the necessity,
not only of preserving the importance of the original local source of the idea, but of making it
paramount. This intensification of the ideal, moral, and factual immensity of the movement's
point of origin and direction must take place in exact proportion as the movement's
germcells, which have now become innumerable, demand new links in the shape of
organizational forms.
For, as the increasing number of individual adherents makes it impossible to continue direct
communication with them for the formation of the lowest bodies, the ultimate innumerable
increase of these lowest organizational forms compels in turn creation of higher associations
which politically can be designated roughly as county or district groups.
Easy as it still may be to maintain the authority of the original center toward the lowest local
groups, it will be equally difficult to maintain this position toward the higher organizational
forms which now arise. But this is the precondition for the unified existence of the movement
and hence for carrying out an idea.
If, finally, these larger intermediary divisions are also combined into new organizational
forms, the difficulty is further increased of safeguarding, even toward them, the
unconditional leading character of the original founding site, its school, etc.
Therefore, the mechanical forms of an organization may only be developed to the degree in
which the spiritual ideal authority of a center seems unconditionally secured. In political
formations this guaranty can often seem provided only by practical power.
From this the following directives for the inner structure of the movement resulted:
(a) Concentration for the time being of all activity in a single place: Munich. Training of a
community of unconditionally reliable supporters and development of a school for the
subsequent dissemination of the idea. Acquisition of the necessary authority for the future by
the greatest possible visible successes in this one place.
To make the movement and its leaders known, it was necessary, not only to shake the belief
in the invincibility of the Marxist doctrine in one place for all to see, but to demonstrate the
possibility of an opposing movement.
(b) Formation of local groups only when the authority of the central leadership in Munich
may be regarded as unquestionably recognized.
(c) Likewise the formation of district, county, or provincial groups depends, not only on the
need for them, but also on certainty that an unconditional recognition of the center has been
achieved.
Furthermore, the creation of organizational forms is dependent on the men who are available
and can be considered as leaders
This may occur in two ways:
(a) The movement disposes of the necessary financial means for the training and schooling of
minds capable of future leadership. It then distributes the material thus acquired
systematically according to criteria of tactical and other expediency.
This way is the easier and quicker; however, it demands great financial means, since this
leader material is only able to work for the movement when paid.