Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
- TAGS
- kampf
- adolf
- hitler
- stuff2share.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
shed tears over the lost 'lambs'; for it lost only those who had long ceased to belong to it. The<br />
difference between the new reformation and the old one was that in the old days many of the<br />
best people in the Church turned away from it through profound religious conviction, while<br />
now only those who were lukewarm to begin with departed, and this from 'considerations' of<br />
a political nature.<br />
And precisely from the political standpoint the result was just as laughable as it was sad.<br />
Once again a promising political movement for the salvation of the German nation had gone<br />
to the dogs because it had not been led with the necessary cold ruthlessness, but had lost<br />
itself in fields which could only lead to disintegration.<br />
For one thing is assuredly true:<br />
The Pan-German movement would never have made this mistake but for its insufficient<br />
understanding of the psyche of the broad masses. If its leaders had known that to achieve<br />
any success one should, on purely psychological grounds, never show the masses two or<br />
more opponents, since this leads to a total disintegration of their fighting power, for this<br />
reason alone the thrust of the Pan-German movement would have been directed at a single<br />
adversary. Nothing is more dangerous for a political party than to be led <strong>by</strong> those jacks-ofall-trades<br />
who want everything but can never really achieve anything.<br />
Regardless how much room for criticism there was in any religious denomination a political<br />
party must never for a moment lose sight of the fact that in all previous historical experience<br />
a purely political party in such situations had never succeeded in producing a religious<br />
reformation. And the aim of studying history is not to forget its lessons when occasion arises<br />
for its practical application, or to decide that the present situation is different after all, and<br />
that therefore its old eternal truths are no longer applicable; no, the purpose of studying<br />
history is precisely its lesson for the present. The man who cannot do this must not conceive<br />
of himself as a political leader; in reality he is a shallow, though usually very conceited, fool,<br />
and no amount of good will can excuse his practical incapacity.<br />
In general the art of all truly great national leaders at all times consists among other things<br />
primarily in not dividing the attention of a people, but in concentrating it upon a single foe.<br />
The more unified the application of a people's will to fight, the greater will be the magnetic<br />
attraction of a movement and the mightier will be the impetus of the thrust. It belongs to the<br />
genius of a great leader to make even adversaries far removed from one another seem to<br />
belong to a single category, because in weak and uncertain characters the knowledge of<br />
having different enemies can only too readily lead to the beginning of doubt in their own<br />
right.<br />
Once the wavering mass sees itself in a struggle against too many enemies, objectivity will<br />
put in an appearance, throwing open the question whether all others are really wrong and<br />
only their own people or their own movement are in the right.<br />
And this brings about the first paralysis of their own power. Hence a multiplicity of different<br />
adversaries must always be<br />
combined so that in the eyes of the masses of one's own supporters the struggle is directed<br />
against only one enemy. This strengthens their faith in their own right and enhances their<br />
bitterness against those who attack it.<br />
That the old Pan-German movement failed to understand this deprived it of success.<br />
Its goal had been correct, its will pure, but the road it chose was wrong. It was like a<br />
mountain climber who keeps the peak to be climbed in view and who sets out with the<br />
greatest determination and energy, but pays no attention to the trail, for his eyes are always<br />
on his goal, so that he neither sees nor feels out the character of the ascent and thus comes<br />
to grief in the end.<br />
The opposite state of affairs seemed to prevail with its great competitor, the Christian Social<br />
Party.<br />
The road it chose was correct and well-chosen, but it lacked clear knowledge of its goal.