09.02.2013 Views

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13<br />

Facilitating anxiety in <strong>the</strong> EFL classroom: <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coin<br />

Christina Gkonou<br />

Facilitating anxiety in <strong>the</strong> EFL classroom:<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coin<br />

Christina Gkonou<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Essex<br />

cgkono@essex.ac.uk<br />

Research on English language classroom anxiety (ELCA) has mostly<br />

highlighted its debilitating nature stemming from learners’ low self-esteem,<br />

demanding oral classroom tasks, and unfriendly lockstep teaching<br />

environments, and resulting in learners’ low achievement in EFL (Horwitz,<br />

2000, 2001; Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986). However, language anxiety<br />

should also be viewed as having a facilitating effect or even no effect at all<br />

on learners’ per<strong>for</strong>mance (Dörnyei, 2005). The ‘no effect’ position largely<br />

originated from Sparks and Ganschow’s (1991) Linguistic Coding<br />

Deficit/Differences Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis (LCDH) stating that high per<strong>for</strong>mance in<br />

<strong>for</strong>eign language learning depends on learners’ cognitive abilities, L1<br />

deficiencies, and aptitude.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> contrary, facilitating anxiety was shown to interact with learner<br />

motivation and amount <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t invested in learning (Chastain, 1975;<br />

Kleinmann, 1977). What facilitating anxiety actually represents is a kind <strong>of</strong><br />

alertness (Young, 1992), positive energy (Aida, 1994), and tension or<br />

arousal (Ehrman, 1996) from <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> learners in EFL situations.<br />

More recent research indicated that students experience both euphoric and<br />

dysphoric tension in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign language classroom; <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer poses a<br />

challenge to <strong>the</strong> learners, but it is controllable and promotes positive and<br />

successful encounters with <strong>the</strong> language (Spielman & Radn<strong>of</strong>sky, 2001).<br />

Criticism to facilitating anxiety though has been made by Horwitz (2010, p.<br />

154) who argued that “it is intuitive that anxiety would inhibit <strong>the</strong> learning<br />

and/or production <strong>of</strong> a second language” and that Kleinmann’s (1977)<br />

study “un<strong>for</strong>tunately” indicated that “language students must be made a<br />

little anxious so that <strong>the</strong>y will work harder” (p. 156).<br />

To investigate <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> facilitating anxiety on Greek EFL learners’<br />

classroom per<strong>for</strong>mance as well as <strong>the</strong> reasons why teachers occasionally<br />

make <strong>the</strong>ir students anxious, focus group interviews were conducted with<br />

twelve EFL teachers and nine EFL students in private language school<br />

settings in Greece. The focus groups were <strong>for</strong>med by using pre-existing<br />

groups, that is colleagues and classmates. The researcher opted <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!