09.02.2013 Views

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Proceedings of the - British Association for Applied Linguistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>Applied</strong> <strong>Linguistics</strong>: <strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 44th Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> BAAL<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West <strong>of</strong> England<br />

hardly any problems to identify texts written by non-native speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

English. However, this study also suggests that phraseological mistakes and<br />

a wrong choice <strong>of</strong> register give away <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writer even more<br />

clearly than grammatical errors do. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, L1 teachers <strong>of</strong> English<br />

tend to be more tolerant in <strong>the</strong>ir evaluation than non-native speakers are;<br />

especially with phrases, which are quite close to <strong>the</strong>ir own mo<strong>the</strong>r tongue<br />

in wording and structure. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand non-native speakers without an<br />

EFL background are more easily mislead by a very confident, non-learnerstereotypical<br />

style.<br />

These findings support two suggestions, namely, once more <strong>the</strong> assertion<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re is in fact such a thing as a learner group specific phraseology and<br />

that native like phraseology within a text does not only trigger a<br />

corresponding evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authors background but also that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

factors are partly more influencing than <strong>for</strong> example grammar. Hence <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> native-like phraseology within a text seems to be a ra<strong>the</strong>r influential<br />

factor, which should be taken into consideration in <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

linguistic competence as well as <strong>for</strong>eign language teaching and teacher<br />

training.<br />

References<br />

Sylvie de Cock (1999) Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and<br />

writing. In Christian Mair and Marianne Hundt (eds.) Corpus <strong>Linguistics</strong> and<br />

Linguistic Theory. Papers from <strong>the</strong> Twentieth International Conference on<br />

English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Radopi:<br />

Amsterdam & Atlanta.<br />

Franz Josef Hausmann (1984). Wortschatzlernen ist Kollokationslernen. Zum Lehren<br />

und Lernen französischer Wortverbindungen. In Praxis des neusprachlichen<br />

Unterrichts, 31 (4), 1984, pp395-406.<br />

Thomas Herbst (1992). Pro-Nunciation: Zur Bedeutung einer guten Aussprache in der<br />

Fremdsprache. In Die Neueren Sprachen, 91 (1), 1992, pp2-18.<br />

Brigitta Mittmann (2004). Mehrwort-Cluster in der englischen Alltagskonversation.<br />

Unterschiede zwischen britischem und amerikanischem gesprochenen Englisch<br />

als Indikatoren für den präfabrizierten Charakter der Sprache. Gunter Narr:<br />

Tübingen, Germany.<br />

John Sinclair (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press:<br />

Ox<strong>for</strong>d, UK.<br />

Birgit Waibel (2008). Phrasal verbs – German and Italian Learners <strong>of</strong> English<br />

Compared. Vdm Verlag: Saarbrücken, Germany.<br />

Allison Wray (2000). Formulaic Sequences in Second Language Teaching: Principle<br />

and Practice. In <strong>Applied</strong> <strong>Linguistics</strong>, 21 (4), 2000, pp463-489.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!