11.02.2013 Views

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11 Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials by AEH 229<br />

Moreover, the de<strong>for</strong>mation microstructural field is def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

where<br />

ε (1)<br />

ij (x,y)=Tkl<br />

�<br />

ij<br />

T kl<br />

ij<br />

I mn<br />

kl<br />

∂χmn<br />

k −<br />

∂yl<br />

1 � �<br />

= δikδ jl + δilδ jk<br />

2<br />

� ∂u (0)<br />

m<br />

∂xn<br />

(11.20)<br />

(11.21)<br />

δij is the Kronecker delta. For a given po<strong>in</strong>t on the macroscale x, Eqs. (11.19)–<br />

(11.20) are used to calculate approximate values of the stress and de<strong>for</strong>mation fields,<br />

respectively, with<strong>in</strong> the heterogeneous material. In contrast, the homogenised stress<br />

field, as it is the average value of the microstructural stresses σ (1)<br />

ij <strong>in</strong> Y, is unable to<br />

represent any microstructural fluctuations of the stress field.<br />

11.3 F<strong>in</strong>ite Element Method <strong>in</strong> AEH<br />

11.3.1 Corrector χχχ<br />

The solution of Eq. (11.12) is called corrector (χχχ) and conta<strong>in</strong>s the eigende<strong>for</strong>mations<br />

of the representative periodic geometry [5]. The element stra<strong>in</strong> and stress<br />

matrices are ε = Bu and σ = DBu, respectively, where all the variables belong<br />

to the microscale problem, i.e. are relative to the geometry and material of the RUC.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, the f<strong>in</strong>ite element approach to Eq. (11.12) results <strong>in</strong><br />

�<br />

�<br />

(11.22)<br />

Y e BT DBdY χχχ =<br />

Y e BT DdY = F D<br />

where the <strong>in</strong>dex e denotes element quantities from the meshed unit-cell doma<strong>in</strong><br />

(body Y) [6]. It is worthwhile to note that the corrector χχχ is a matrix, not a vector.<br />

The second term of Eq. (11.22) consists on the columns of the matrix F D [6], which<br />

consist on six load vectors, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the same number of systems of equations<br />

to solve. The results are solutions that make up the corrector, each one def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

an eigende<strong>for</strong>mation mode. Moreover, the def<strong>in</strong>ition of matrix F D shows that the<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce vectors appear from the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the gradient of elastic properties of the<br />

material components that <strong>for</strong>m the composite material.<br />

11.3.2 Periodicity Boundary Conditions<br />

Periodicity boundary conditions are imposed over the surface boundaries of the<br />

RUC. For a hexahedral unit-cell <strong>in</strong> y1 ∈ [0,y 0 1 ], y2 ∈ [0,y 0 2 ] and y3 ∈ [0,y 0 3 ],the<br />

boundary conditions can be def<strong>in</strong>ed as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!