11.02.2013 Views

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236 J.A. Oliveira et al.<br />

Fig. 11.10 Representation<br />

of the components of the<br />

constitutive material matrix<br />

D h calculated with tetrahedra<br />

(T) and hexahedra (H)<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite element meshes, <strong>for</strong> an<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ium matrix composite<br />

material re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>ced with<br />

boron cont<strong>in</strong>uous cyl<strong>in</strong>drical<br />

fibres (47% vol.)<br />

Table 11.2 Numerical (N), analytical (A) and experimental (E) elastic properties of an alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />

matrix composite material re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>ced with boron fibres (47% vol.)<br />

Results E11 [GPa] E22 [GPa] G12 [GPa] G23 [GPa] ν12 [-] ν23 [-]<br />

N – AEH 214.6 144.5 54.7 46.2 0.19 0.25<br />

N – Xia et al. 214 143 54.2 45.7 0.195 0.253<br />

N – Sun and Vaidya 215 144 57.2 45.9 0.19 0.29<br />

A – Sun and Chen 214 135 51.1 – 0.19 –<br />

A – Chamis 214 156 62.6 43.6 0.20 0.31<br />

A – Whitney and Riley 215 123 53.9 – 0.19 –<br />

E – Kenaga et al. 216 140 52 – 0.29 –<br />

use of these f<strong>in</strong>ite element meshes are represented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 11.10, where, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Eq. (11.25), the tetragonal character of the composite material is observed. The<br />

manipulation of the homogenised flexibility matrix components associated to the<br />

numerical analysis us<strong>in</strong>g the tetrahedral f<strong>in</strong>ite element mesh allows the calculation<br />

of the elastic properties of the composite material. These properties are shown <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 11.2, along with results taken from numerical (N) and analytical (A) predictions,<br />

and experimental results (E) [12]. In what concerns the numerical prediction<br />

results, Xia et al. [24] presented values achieved through a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

element method with explicit periodicity conditions based on the micromechanical<br />

models developed by Suquet [20]. Sun and Vaidya [19] presented numerical results<br />

based on the conjugation of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of equivalent de<strong>for</strong>mation energy with the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite element method. The analytical prediction results of Whitney and Riley [23]<br />

are based on energy weight<strong>in</strong>g methods derived from the classical theory of elasticity.<br />

The analytical prediction results presented by Sun and Chen [18] and Chamis [4]<br />

are based on micromechanical models <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uity and load equilibrium<br />

conditions. The numerical values were obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>version of the elasticity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!