11.02.2013 Views

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

Computational Methods for Debonding in Composites

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Material and Failure Models <strong>for</strong> Textile <strong>Composites</strong> 33<br />

Another advantage of the approximate mesh<strong>in</strong>g is that it simplifies the discretization<br />

of complicated geometries <strong>in</strong> the mesomechanical unit cell and the application<br />

of periodic boundary conditions. The geometry of fiber bundles has to be approximated<br />

anyway because it is irregular due to the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g process. In addition<br />

the def<strong>in</strong>ition of clear boundaries between fiber bundle and epoxy is problematic<br />

as the fiber bundle itself conta<strong>in</strong>s epoxy. There<strong>for</strong>e Gunnion [7] has shown that the<br />

voxel method is well suited to determ<strong>in</strong>e stiffnesses of textile composites.<br />

2.2.3 Micromechanical Unit Cell<br />

For transversely isotropic UD-material state of the art mixture rules give a good<br />

estimation of the elastic properties, but lack to predict <strong>in</strong>elastic properties such<br />

as strength and harden<strong>in</strong>g of the fiber bundle. So, the micromechanical unit cell<br />

is needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e these parameters when experimental data is not available.<br />

This is often the case <strong>for</strong> textile composites, because the tests required cannot be<br />

done with the whole pre<strong>for</strong>m, but only with a part of it, the fiber bundles. Thus the<br />

specimens have to be produced especially <strong>for</strong> these tests.<br />

A micrograph of unidirectional composite material is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.4a. It can<br />

be modelled with a representative volume element on the microscale that consists<br />

of fiber and matrix. Neglect<strong>in</strong>g the random fiber distribution over the cross section,<br />

a regular square fiber arrangement, that can be reduced to the unit cell shown<br />

<strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.4b, is assumed. It has been shown previously [19], that this is a good<br />

approximation.<br />

As mentioned above, the micromechanical unit cell consists only of one fibre,<br />

that can even be reduced to a quarter of a fiber, see Fig. 2.5 when a symmetric load<br />

is applied due to symmetry reasons.<br />

In the examples given here glass fibres and epoxy matrix are used. Both are<br />

isotropic materials, whose material parameters are well known from test and are<br />

summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 2.1. Strength of the epoxy res<strong>in</strong> is neglected <strong>in</strong> fiber direction<br />

and there<strong>for</strong>e strength <strong>in</strong> fiber direction R t,c<br />

� can be computed analytically from the<br />

(a) Micrograph [3] (b) Square arrangement<br />

Fig. 2.4 Micromechanical unit cell<br />

Matrix<br />

Fiber<br />

(c) Unit cell geometry

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!