Cluster II - Global Public Policy institute

89KEY QUESTIONTo what degree has the cluster approach modified and strengthened the humanitarian response (in terms of gaps filledand greater geographic, thematic and quality of coverage, as well as ownership/connectedness)?indicator19. Coverage of ETC and logistics servicesCoverage of ETC and logistics servicese v a l u a t i o n cr i t e r i o nEffectivenessl e v e l of lo g i c mo d e lOutcomes c a l e0: ETC and logistics services are neither sufficient, norrelevant to the needs of their users1: ETC and logistics services are sufficient in quantity, butnot targeted to the needs of their users2: ETC and logistics services are targeted to the needs oftheir users, but do not cover all needs3: The needs of ETC and logistics users are completelycoveredKEY QUESTIONWhat intentional or unintentional positive or negative effects of the cluster approach concerning affectedpopulations, the coordination and interactions among participating organizations and the humanitarian systemas a whole can be demonstrated?indicator20. Evidence for effectsEvidence for effects (intentional or unintentional, positive or negative) of the cluster approach on the affected populations,the coordination and interactions among participating organizations and the humanitarian system as a whole can bedemonstratede v a l u a t i o n cr i t e r i o nEffectsKEY QUESTIONIs there evidence that the results of the cluster approach justify the inputs of major stakeholders such as the IASC, NGOs,host communities and donors at the country level?indicator21. Evidence that results justify investmentsEvidence that the results of the cluster approach justify the investment made by major stakeholders at the country levele v a l u a t i o n cr i t e r i o nEfficiencyl e v e l of lo g i c mo d e lInput