04.12.2012 Views

Review of the Research Institute for History and - Universiteit Utrecht

Review of the Research Institute for History and - Universiteit Utrecht

Review of the Research Institute for History and - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table B.5 Funding <strong>and</strong> expenditure at institutional level, 1997-2004<br />

The total budget was 2.5 million euros in 1997, <strong>and</strong> 5.8 million euros in 2004. The budget as a whole <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e<br />

increased by 135%. These fi gures are, however, seriously misleading. Included in <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>for</strong> direct<br />

funding are <strong>the</strong> budgets <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> three National <strong>Research</strong> School administered by OGC (NOV <strong>and</strong> OSK <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> whole period, OSL since 2003), <strong>the</strong> budgets <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> expertise-centrums (Internationals Offi ce <strong>and</strong> GEM),<br />

<strong>the</strong> IEAH administration (since 2002) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget <strong>for</strong> University Chairs (Van Oostrom since 2002 <strong>and</strong><br />

Philipse since 2004). In <strong>the</strong> period 1997-2004, <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OGC proper has been approximately<br />

30%. This was partly due to a favourable rearrangement <strong>of</strong> budgets between <strong>the</strong> research institutes,<br />

partly because <strong>of</strong> some compensation <strong>for</strong> salary increases. Never<strong>the</strong>less, cost increase (especially salaries <strong>for</strong><br />

PhD-students) has been much higher. The increase in expenditure <strong>of</strong> personnel costs <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> OGC as a whole<br />

from 1.6 Million in 1997 till 5.1 Million in 2004 is partly due to <strong>the</strong>se rising costs <strong>and</strong> partly to growth in<br />

number <strong>of</strong> appointments. In 1997 NWO <strong>and</strong> VSNU agreed to transfer all NWO research money—<strong>and</strong> thus<br />

<strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> employment—to <strong>the</strong> universities. That explains that only from 1998 on <strong>the</strong>se funds appear in <strong>the</strong><br />

OGC-budget.<br />

Table B.6 Funding <strong>of</strong> all research time (tenured staff, non tenured staff, PhDs)<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

University funding 67% 68% 70% 70% 75% 72% 70% 74%<br />

Governmental/public funding 26% 25% 18% 18% 16% 18% 20% 19%<br />

Non Governmental funding 7% 7% 12% 12% 9% 10% 10% 7%<br />

Total research staff 100% 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

It is important to realize that <strong>the</strong>se percentages represent something different than <strong>the</strong> fi gures in Table B.5.<br />

Included in <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> university funding is <strong>the</strong> research time <strong>of</strong> faculty appointed in <strong>the</strong> teaching<br />

institutes. These institutes administer <strong>the</strong>ir own budgets <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>the</strong> incomes/expenses <strong>for</strong> research time <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir faculty don’t appear in <strong>the</strong> OGC-budget <strong>of</strong> Table B.5.<br />

OGC <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> Culture<br />

372

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!