14.05.2013 Views

Jardim Botânico de Coimbra: contraponto entre a Arte e a ... - artez

Jardim Botânico de Coimbra: contraponto entre a Arte e a ... - artez

Jardim Botânico de Coimbra: contraponto entre a Arte e a ... - artez

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tamente a 9 <strong>de</strong> Outubro <strong>de</strong>sse ano e a 12 do<br />

mesmo mês na Faculda<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> Medicina. A<br />

leccionação <strong>de</strong> história natural acarretava,<br />

cumulativamente, tal como se previa nos<br />

Estatutos, a «intendência» do <strong>Jardim</strong> <strong>Botânico</strong>,<br />

tarefa que exerceu até Janeiro <strong>de</strong> 1791,<br />

ano em que se jubilou e foi substituído na<br />

direcção do <strong>Jardim</strong> por Félix Avelar Brotero.<br />

Van<strong>de</strong>lli surge-nos associado a outros dois<br />

paduanos que se <strong>de</strong>bruçariam sobre o horto<br />

conimbricense. João António Dalla-Bella,<br />

graduado a 4 <strong>de</strong> Maio <strong>de</strong> 1773 na Faculda<strong>de</strong><br />

<strong>de</strong> Medicina e na <strong>de</strong> Filosofia, on<strong>de</strong> ensinou<br />

física, integrou, como acima relatámos, o<br />

grupo <strong>de</strong> professores que, juntamente com<br />

o reitor, visitaram e analisaram o local para<br />

o estabelecimento do <strong>Jardim</strong>. Mas é sobretudo<br />

Júlio Mattiazzi que nos importa <strong>de</strong>stacar,<br />

uma vez que, antes <strong>de</strong> ser trazido por<br />

Van<strong>de</strong>lli para Portugal, em 1768, para com<br />

ele colaborar em Lisboa e em <strong>Coimbra</strong>,<br />

<strong>de</strong>sempenhava funções <strong>de</strong> jardineiro no<br />

<strong>Jardim</strong> <strong>Botânico</strong> <strong>de</strong> Pádua. Não é, por conseguinte,<br />

<strong>de</strong> estranhar que o risco do <strong>Jardim</strong><br />

da Universida<strong>de</strong> por ele executado <strong>de</strong>ixe<br />

transparecer o mo<strong>de</strong>lo do da sua cida<strong>de</strong><br />

natal.<br />

Permanece incerto o lugar <strong>de</strong> Guilherme<br />

Els<strong>de</strong>n no <strong>de</strong>lineamento do inicial programa<br />

do <strong>Jardim</strong>, não sendo possível assegurar ser<br />

da sua autoria a planta guardada na biblioteca<br />

do Departamento <strong>de</strong> Botânica. Por<br />

um lado, sabe-se que, em Maio <strong>de</strong> 1773, o<br />

tenente-coronel já havia chegado a <strong>Coimbra</strong><br />

e, à partida, tudo indica que se tenha<br />

<strong>de</strong>dicado a tal tarefa, uma vez que o marquês<br />

o havia expressamente responsabilizado<br />

pela mesma. Aliás, quando, em Fevereiro<br />

<strong>de</strong> 1773, D. Francisco <strong>de</strong> Lemos escrevia<br />

ao ministro sobre a análise do terreno<br />

para o <strong>Jardim</strong> e o andamento das restantes<br />

obras universitárias, garantia que “fico esperando<br />

o tenente-coronel Els<strong>de</strong>n para com<br />

elle conferir tudo quanto respeita á execução<br />

das Plantas que V.ª Ex.ª foi servido<br />

remetter-me, e o mais que for preciso. E<br />

sem elle nada obrarei” 7 . A própria planta do<br />

36<br />

Van<strong>de</strong>lli’s name frequently appears associated<br />

with two other Paduans that were<br />

also connected to the <strong>Coimbra</strong> Gar<strong>de</strong>n,<br />

João António Dalla-Bella and Júlio Mattiazzi.<br />

Dalla-Bella, who graduated on 4th May<br />

1773 from the Faculty of Medicine and Philosophy,<br />

where he taught physics, was in<br />

the group of professors that, together with<br />

the Rector, visited and analysed the site for<br />

the Gar<strong>de</strong>n, as we have mentioned. But it<br />

is Júlio Mattiazzi that is most <strong>de</strong>serving of<br />

our attention, since before being brought<br />

to Portugal by Van<strong>de</strong>lli in 1768 to collaborate<br />

with him in Lisbon and <strong>Coimbra</strong>, had<br />

been the gar<strong>de</strong>ner at the Botanical Gar<strong>de</strong>n<br />

of Padua. It is therefore not surprising that<br />

his sketch for the University Gar<strong>de</strong>n should<br />

reflect features of the mo<strong>de</strong>l in his native<br />

city.<br />

The role played by William Els<strong>de</strong>n in the<br />

<strong>de</strong>lineation of the initial programme for<br />

the Gar<strong>de</strong>n remains unclear, since we do<br />

not know for certain if the plan kept in the<br />

Botany Department library is in fact by<br />

him. On the one hand, we know that he<br />

arrived in <strong>Coimbra</strong> in May 1773 and everything<br />

indicates at the outset that he was<br />

to un<strong>de</strong>rtake the task, since the Marquis<br />

had expressly appointed him for it. In<strong>de</strong>ed,<br />

when D. Francisco <strong>de</strong> Lemos wrote to the<br />

minister in February 1773 about the analysis<br />

of the terrain for the Gar<strong>de</strong>n and the<br />

progress of the remaining university works,<br />

he assured him that he was “awaiting Lieutenant-Colonel<br />

Els<strong>de</strong>n to discuss with him<br />

the plans that Your Excellency has sent me<br />

and anything else that is <strong>de</strong>emed necessary.<br />

Until he comes I shall not proceed” 7 .<br />

The plan itself, which had been drawn in<br />

the meantime, also reveals ignorance of the<br />

unevenness of the terrain, which could be<br />

explained by the fact that Els<strong>de</strong>n had not<br />

accompanied the rector and professors on<br />

their visit to the site, having been in Lisbon<br />

at the time “incapacitated with an attack of<br />

gout” 8 .<br />

On the other hand, we do not have his sig-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!