Горизонт N23/852
Горизонт (газета) — (Gorizont англ. Horizon ) первая и наиболее влиятельная газета, издающаяся на русском языке в штатеКолорадо, США. Еженедельник, выходит по пятницам, формат Таблоид, 128 цветных и чернобелых страниц, распространяется в городах, составляющих метрополию Денвера (Большой Денвер), и в других населенных пунктах штата Колорадо от графства Саммит до графства Эль—Пасо. Полная электронная версия газеты «Горизонт» доступна в сети Интернет. Подробнее http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorizont_(newspaper)
Горизонт (газета) — (Gorizont англ. Horizon ) первая и наиболее влиятельная газета, издающаяся на русском языке в штатеКолорадо, США. Еженедельник, выходит по пятницам, формат Таблоид, 128 цветных и чернобелых страниц, распространяется в городах, составляющих метрополию Денвера (Большой Денвер), и в других населенных пунктах штата Колорадо от графства Саммит до графства Эль—Пасо. Полная электронная версия газеты «Горизонт» доступна в сети Интернет. Подробнее http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorizont_(newspaper)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10<br />
(NaturalNews) The topic of<br />
yvaccines tends to inspire strong<br />
feelings in people one way or the<br />
other, and the admissions made<br />
by a CDC whistleblower in the<br />
recent documentary VAXXED<br />
certainly added fuel to the fire.<br />
However, one aspect of the vaccine<br />
debate that many people can<br />
yagree on is that forcing experimental<br />
vaccines on anyone is a<br />
questionable practice at best.<br />
In one of the most egregious<br />
examples of this, the FDA used<br />
its authority to force American<br />
military personnel to get an experimental<br />
anthrax vaccine while<br />
a civil lawsuit challenging the<br />
authority of the Department of<br />
Defense to mandate unapproved<br />
vaccines was pending.<br />
Since 1998, countless service<br />
personnel have reported becoming<br />
ill after being given a series of<br />
y<br />
RUSSIAN DENVER / HORIZON<br />
The 6 most popular toxins Americans coat their bodies with, and then wonder why<br />
they’re suffering from inflammation, rashes, skin allergies and cancer<br />
(NaturalNews) An explosive<br />
new federal complaint finally<br />
sheds some light on the great<br />
mystery of why exactly the EPA,<br />
which is tasked with protecting<br />
the environment, inexplicably<br />
sits back and allows the fracking<br />
industry to destroy the earth.<br />
According to the environmental<br />
watchdog group NC<br />
WARN based out of North Carolina,<br />
the data regarding toxic<br />
emissions from fracking has<br />
been the subject of a long-term<br />
wand systematic cover-up that involved<br />
payoffs from the gas and<br />
yoil industry to at least one researcher<br />
for the EPA.<br />
(NaturalNews) Millions of<br />
yhealth enthusiasts around the<br />
world crosscheck everything<br />
they eat and drink, along with<br />
all of their medicines, for toxic<br />
ingredients that can cause a<br />
whole host of health problems.<br />
This is nothing new. However,<br />
if you were to go into their<br />
homes, into their bathrooms,<br />
and start opening drawers and<br />
cabinets, and flipping personal<br />
care products over to read the<br />
ingredients, you would find the<br />
majority of those products contain<br />
the very same toxins these<br />
folks are doing their very best<br />
to avoid consuming.<br />
The irony is that the skin is<br />
ythe largest organ, and it does<br />
“consume” the toxins applied<br />
to it, and this may be more dangerous<br />
than the carcinogens<br />
they avoid eating and drinking.<br />
Here’s why: When you eat or<br />
drink foods and medicines that<br />
contain toxins, those toxins<br />
are often found in minuscule<br />
amounts, otherwise you’d get<br />
sick right away and know what’s<br />
happening. However, the products<br />
we put on our hair, nails,<br />
face, arms, legs, feet and even<br />
yprivate parts are completely unregulated,<br />
because neither the<br />
FDA, the CDC, the EPA, the<br />
USDA, nor any other agency<br />
inspects or has limits for personal<br />
care products. Plus, when<br />
it comes to lotions, shampoos,<br />
conditioners, deodorants, antiperspirants,<br />
powders, cosmetics<br />
and so forth, people simply<br />
“cake” them on, coating large<br />
surface areas with unlimited<br />
toxins that find their way into<br />
the bloodstream, the digestive<br />
tract and even the lungs and<br />
cleansing organs.<br />
Yes, it’s overwhelming. It’s<br />
overwhelming to the brain to<br />
think of all of this. It’s overwhelming<br />
to your cleansing<br />
organs too. It’s overwhelming<br />
to the natural detoxification<br />
process that the body wants to<br />
engage, but can’t, because it’s<br />
coated with these toxins. It’s<br />
like wondering why you can’t<br />
breathe properly while you’ve<br />
got a blanket over your head all<br />
day. Hey, quit sweeping all the<br />
“dust” under the rug and then<br />
wondering why you’re having<br />
allergy attacks. Your skin is<br />
your largest organ. It needs to<br />
sweat properly. It needs sunlight<br />
to create vitamin D. It<br />
needs to breathe! Remember,<br />
if most of the ingredients in a<br />
personal care product aren’t<br />
edible, then it shouldn’t be<br />
coating your body.<br />
Here are the six most popular<br />
toxins Americans coat their<br />
bodies with, and then wonder<br />
why they’re suffering from inflammation,<br />
rashes, skin allergies<br />
and cancer:<br />
1. Petroleum is an industrial<br />
chemical (a liquid mixture<br />
of hydrocarbons) commonly<br />
found in Vaseline, baby oils,<br />
baby lotions, suntan lotions<br />
and sunblock lotions, and is<br />
toxic to the human body –<br />
locking in toxins, preventing<br />
perspiration, and leading to<br />
inflammation, chronic itching<br />
and cancer.<br />
2. Talc is toxic and is commonly<br />
found in baby powders,<br />
popular body powders and foot<br />
powders.<br />
3. Lead, a neurotoxin, is<br />
commonly found in lipstick.<br />
4. Parabens are chemicals<br />
that penetrate the skin and are<br />
common in cosmetics/makeup<br />
– they mimic hormones and<br />
are endocrine disruptors that<br />
cause allergic reactions.<br />
5. Phthalates are found in<br />
moisturizers, perfumes, nail<br />
polishes, soaps and hairsprays,<br />
and can increase the risk of<br />
diabetes in women and lower<br />
sperm production in men.<br />
6. Aluminum is commonly<br />
found in deodorants and antiperspirants,<br />
and is known<br />
to cause cancer tumors in the<br />
breasts in the quadrant closest<br />
to the armpit (not a coincidence).<br />
Start protecting the ‘walls’ of<br />
your ‘temple’<br />
There are over 70,000 chemicals<br />
approved by the FDA for<br />
consumption. Many of them<br />
have toxic effects on the body.<br />
When you unknowingly consume<br />
poisons by applying them<br />
to your body, you feed chronic<br />
inflammation, your immune<br />
system weakens, and you invite<br />
cancer to attack. You don’t need<br />
a PhD to figure it out, and you<br />
don’t need to be a dermatologist.<br />
Go home, look through<br />
every single personal care<br />
product you own, and crosscheck<br />
it for chemicals. Then,<br />
throw it all out, and buy new<br />
organic or truly natural products.<br />
From toxic air fresheners to<br />
toxic candles, people fill their<br />
homes with poisons on a daily<br />
basis and wonder what’s wrong<br />
with their health. These toxins<br />
accumulate on the body too.<br />
People put toxic flea medicines<br />
and poisonous medicines on<br />
their pets, and wonder why<br />
the pet dies after five to seven<br />
years from leukemia. People<br />
spray Roundup, the most toxic<br />
herbicide on the planet, all over<br />
their yards and around their<br />
gardens, and then it gets on<br />
their pets’ paws, on their own<br />
hands, and on the food they’ll<br />
be eating, and then they wonder<br />
how they all get cancer.<br />
People coat themselves with<br />
toxic bug repellent and can’t<br />
seem to figure out how they<br />
keep getting skin cancer spots<br />
developing. Hmm, don’t you<br />
wonder? People lather themselves<br />
up all summer with toxic<br />
suntan lotions and carcinogenic<br />
sunblock lotions, and lock in<br />
poisons while blocking out the<br />
healing sunshine. Oops.<br />
Stop wondering what’s going<br />
wrong and fix it! Your body is<br />
the temple of your soul. Protect<br />
it.<br />
SHOCK FINDING: 30 percent of U.S. military damaged by anthrax vaccine<br />
vaccines for anthrax before Middle<br />
East deployment. Those who<br />
refused to get the jab faced punishments<br />
including discharge.<br />
According to MintPress News,<br />
30 percent of those in the military<br />
who received the vaccine ended<br />
up with vaccine damage referred<br />
to as Gulf War Syndrome, and the<br />
issues caused were career-ending<br />
for some, particularly pilots.<br />
MintPress News cites the University<br />
of Minnesota’s Center for<br />
Infectious Disease Research and<br />
Policy’s 2002 report, which says<br />
that the mandatory anthrax vaccines<br />
caused many Air National<br />
Guard and Air Force Reserve<br />
members to transfer or leave the<br />
military altogether.<br />
85 percent of troops noted adverse<br />
reactions<br />
Data from a survey by the<br />
General Accounting Office<br />
(GAO) of Congress showed that<br />
85 percent of the troops who<br />
were subjected to anthrax shots<br />
experienced adverse reactions,<br />
which is significantly higher than<br />
the 30 percent the manufacturer<br />
claimed. The survey involved a<br />
random sample of more than<br />
1,200 guard and reserve personnel.<br />
This prompted the GAO to<br />
recommend that the DoD institute<br />
an “active surveillance<br />
program for vaccine reactions.”<br />
According to GAO estimates, 77<br />
percent of aircrew who received<br />
the shot would not have done so<br />
if they had been given a choice.<br />
Symptoms and concerns<br />
brushed aside<br />
Gulf War Syndrome is the<br />
name given to the set of symptoms<br />
experienced by military<br />
personnel involved in the Gulf<br />
War, and it includes chronic<br />
symptoms such as cognitive<br />
problems, muscle pain, fatigue,<br />
diarrhea, and rashes. Adding<br />
insult to injury, the military has<br />
called it an “emotional ailment”<br />
despite its measurable physical<br />
manifestations.<br />
While some higher-ups have<br />
tried to explain Gulf War Syndrome<br />
as the result of conditions<br />
on the ground, soldiers who<br />
fought there from Israel, Egypt<br />
and Kuwait did not end up suffering<br />
from it. Interestingly, those<br />
soldiers did not receive Anthrax<br />
vaccines.<br />
One third of vets afflicted<br />
The National Academy of Sciences<br />
reports that more than one<br />
third of vets in the first Gulf War<br />
suffer from the ailment, and a<br />
2009 study in the Journal of Inorganic<br />
Biochemistry suggested that<br />
the main culprit could be aluminum<br />
hydroxide, which was an<br />
adjuvant in the anthrax vaccine.<br />
Our military personnel face a<br />
lot of threats while performing<br />
their jobs, and many of the medical<br />
precautions taken to prepare<br />
them are sound ones that can<br />
help prevent illnesses and save<br />
their lives. However, a line has to<br />
be drawn when it comes to preventive<br />
measures with unknown<br />
side effects. How can we expect<br />
our military to defend our country<br />
if we are sending them out to<br />
fight with unapproved vaccines<br />
in their systems working against<br />
their own bodies? Our service<br />
personnel do not deserve to be<br />
treated like guinea pigs and then<br />
be accused of having emotional<br />
problems when they report the<br />
effects of those vaccines or voice<br />
concerns about them.<br />
EPA scientists paid off by oil and gas industry to conceal toxic fracking emissions<br />
According to a federal complaint<br />
filed by the group with<br />
the Inspector General of the<br />
EPA, “there has been a persistent<br />
and deliberate cover-up that has<br />
prevented the agency from requiring<br />
the natural gas industry<br />
to make widespread, urgently<br />
needed and achievable reductions<br />
in methane venting and<br />
leakage (‘emissions’) across the<br />
nation’s expanding natural gas<br />
infrastructure.”<br />
They stated: “Studies relied<br />
upon by EPA to develop policy<br />
and regulations were scientifically<br />
invalid.”<br />
The group alleges that the<br />
<strong>N23</strong>/<strong>852</strong> от 06.17.2016 e-mail: info@gorizont.com Simply the best<br />
man behind the cover-up is Dr.<br />
David Allen, who was the head<br />
of the EPA Science Advisory<br />
Board. They say that he concealed<br />
the under-reporting of<br />
two devices used to measure the<br />
release of gas from equipment<br />
used in the natural gas industry.<br />
Dr. Allen also happens to be a<br />
faculty member of the University<br />
of Texas at Austin, where he has<br />
received funding from the gas<br />
and oil industries for a number<br />
of years. Now it’s all starting to<br />
make sense.<br />
Inventor of device used to<br />
measure methane emissions<br />
warned it was faulty<br />
NC WARN’s Jim Warren<br />
points out that the body’s resultant<br />
failure to demand that<br />
methane leaks are reduced has<br />
exacerbated the climate crisis.<br />
The group made this startling<br />
discovery after learning that the<br />
inventor of the primary device<br />
used to measure the gas released,<br />
the Bacharach Hi-Flow Sampler,<br />
had been trying to blow the<br />
whistle for years on its malfunctioning!<br />
It’s not a small problem,<br />
either; according to the group, a<br />
critical failure makes the faulty<br />
instrument under-report the<br />
emissions of methane “up to<br />
100-fold.”<br />
The device’s inventor, Touche<br />
Howard, says that such a failure<br />
could even cause “catastrophic<br />
explosions”. He says he repeatedly<br />
tried to warn the EPA and<br />
Dr. Allen about the device’s malfunctioning<br />
but was greeted with<br />
silence every time. NC WARN<br />
feels he was ignored out of fear<br />
that he would invalidate their<br />
studies. By showing methane<br />
emissions as being lower than<br />
they actually are, the EPA was<br />
able to say there was no need to<br />
require reductions, and it looks<br />
like the oil and gas industry<br />
made sure of that by having Dr.<br />
Allen in their pocket.