Strona 14Z teczki niepoprawnego optymisty/From files of the notorious optimistCoœ ty, ja mam siê martwiæ? - What, Me Worry?Jan Jekie³ekMotto: Strze¿ siê zmarwienia -ciemni, w której wywo³uje siênegatywyZmartwienia przeœladowa³yludzkoœæ od czasu kiedy Adamugryz³ jab³ko i pomyœla³ o tym coBóg teraz zrobi. Bior¹c pod uwagêfakt, ¿e panie martwi¹ siêbardziej ni¿ panowie, podejrzewam,¿e pierwsza jednak by³aEwa, martwi¹c siê od razu dwukrotnie(a) ¿e zgrzeszy³a myœl¹przekonana argumentacj¹ wê¿a i(b) uczynkiem, namawiaj¹c Adamado konsumpcji zakazanegoowoca. Zauwa¿my równie¿, ¿epiekielny w¹¿ da³ ludziom wprezencie martwienie siê, zajêciebezu¿yteczne i niszcz¹ce tych,którzy jemu siê poddaj¹; niew¹tpliwiediabelski wynalazek. Nale-¿y siê wiêc zastanowiæ, dlaczegomartwienie siê cieszy siê tak wielkimuznaniem i powodzeniem, ico mo¿na zrobiæ, aby nie poddawacsiê jego destruktywnemuwp³ywowi.Ciekawym dowodem, ¿e martwieniesiê mo¿e byæ uznane zarzecz pozytywn¹, jest fikcyjnapostaæ Alfreda E. Neumanna.Pokazuje siê ona od lat w ka¿dymwydaniu periodyka „Mad Magazine”,z podpisem, który mo¿naprzet³umaczyæ na „coœ ty, ja mamsiê martwiæ?”.Alfred E. Neumann jest amerykañskimsymbolem bezmyœlnieradosnej g³upoty. Dlaczego? BoAlfred odmawia martwienia siê,cechy ludzi m¹drych. Jako ciekawostka,George W. Bush jest wAmeryce czêsto przedstawianyjako g³upol Alfred. Nienawistniprzeciwnicy czêsto przesadzaj¹odbieraj¹c Bushowi-Alfredowijego charakterystyczn¹ beztroskê,dodaj¹c mroczne lub z³oœliweoczka lub cyniczne grymasy.W czêœci angielskiej tego artyku³uopisujê dwie rozmowy zpodró¿y, popieraj¹ce moj¹ „teoriê”,¿e kobiety martwi¹ siêwiêcej, i czêsto uwa¿aj¹ zmartwienieza dowód dojrza³oœci.Technicznie o martwieniu siêNajgorsze, bo kompletnie bezu¿ytecznezmartwienia dotycz¹przesz³oœci i „gdybania”. Uwagadla „gdybaj¹cych”: pamiêtajcie,¿e pierwszy odruch s³uchacza jestuciekaæ, gdzie pieprz roœnie,czego niestety zabraniaj¹ zasadydobrego zachowania. Zajmijmysiê wiêc bardziej zmartwieniamina codzieñ.Zmartwienie to przewidywaniepora¿ki, negatywna fantazja rujnuj¹cateraŸniejszoœæ przez œci¹ganienegatywnych mo¿liwoœci zprzysz³oœci. Choroba zmartwieniajest z nami od jakichœ 50,000 lat,ale rozwi¹zanie genetyczne mo¿ebyæ znane w ci¹gu nastêpnych 5lat, kiedy geny powoduj¹ce zmartwieniemog¹ byæ zidentyfikowane.Artyku³ ten koncentruje siê narozwi¹zaniach stanu przejœciowego,do momentu odkrycia genówzmartwienia i metod ich likwidacjilub neutralizacji.Jakieœ 20 lat temu poszed³emna krótki kurs „Personologii”prowadzony przez ponad 80-letniegoRoberta Whiteside’a. Pracuj¹cjako m³ody psycholog wkalifornijskim wiêziennictwie,Robert zaj¹³ siê kolekcjonowaniemcech osobowoœci w oparciuo wygl¹d cz³owieka; g³ównietwarzy, g³owy, i r¹k. Jego analizyjakoœciowe (statystyki jeszcze nieby³o) doprowadzi³y do opisaniawielu cech ludzkich. Personologia,podobnie jak ró¿d¿karstwo,jest odrzucana przez naukê. Zmojego doœwiadczenia jednak,podobnie jak ró¿d¿karstwo, zasadypersonologii dzia³aj¹ doskonale.Dwa zestawy trzech par oczu,pokazane na rysunkach, wzietes¹ze starego skryptu „mojego”kursu Personologii.W pierwszym zestawie oczu„mniejszych zmartwieñ”, patrz¹cod góry, widzimy szkliste, rozszerzoneoczy kogoœ w szoku. Poni-¿ej oczy osoby wysilaj¹cej siêpowy¿ej swoich mo¿liwoœci, izmêczone, przekrwione, szklisteoczy kogoœ bardzo wyczerpanego.W drugim zestawie „wiêkszychzmartwieñ” pierwsze s¹ oczycz³owieka, który mo¿e ³atwo ulecwypadkowi. Jedna Ÿrenica jestwy¿ej ni¿ druga. W pracy, wyœlijpracownika do domu, aby odpocz¹³.Nigdy nie daj siê podwoziæsamochodem cz³owiekowi, któregoŸrenice s¹ w pionowej nierównowadze.Drugi zestaw oczupokazuje zaawansowany stan„melancholii”, gdzie nierozwi¹zanezmartwienia zakumulowa³y siêi cz³owiek ju¿ zaakceptowa³ swójchroniczny stan zmartwienia. Wtrzecim zestawie oczu, Ÿrenicenadal s¹ wy¿ej ods³aniaj¹c bia³ka,ale oczy ju¿ zaczynaj¹ siê b³yszczeæ,znak podniesienia ducha nadrodze wychodzenia z „melancholii”.Jeœli wszystko dobrzepójdzie, Ÿrenice zaczn¹ obni¿aæsiê, i zacznie przybywaæ w nichiskier.Rozwi¹zaniaPoni¿ej opisane s¹ ró¿ne metodypozbywania siê zmartwieñ.Dobrze jest zacz¹æ od diagnozy,po prostu patrz¹c siê do lustra iporównuj¹c swoje oczy to tych narysunkach w tym artykule. Zwróæuwagê na ten ostatni zestaw oczu,w których jasno widaæ budz¹c¹siê nadziejê. WyobraŸ siebie w tejsytuacji. Pomyœl, ¿e Ÿrenice tychoczu zaczn¹ siê wkrótce obni¿aæ,aby osi¹gn¹æ pozycjê œrodkow¹,w której zaczna siê jeszcze bardziejiskrzyæ.Zwyk³¹ biurow¹ gumkê na nadgarstkuobok zegarka mo¿na napinaæi puszczaæ, kiedy z³apiemysiê na zmartwieniu. Poczuj ból ikrzyknij do siebie „stop”. Miejprzygotowane myœli zastêpcze -relaksuj¹ce lub podniecaj¹ce, fantazje,wyzwania - a najlepiej jakiœœmieszny, chwilowo absorbuj¹cyrytua³, niezauwa¿alny dla innych.Innym sposobem jest zaplanowanieczasu na martwienie siê.Powiedzmy od siódmej do ósmej.W czasie przeznaczonym na martwieniesiê musisz siê œpieszyæ,aby zd¹¿yæ pokryæ wszystkiezmartwienia. Jak czas minie,od³ó¿ nieza³atwione zmartwieniana nastêpny raz. Po kilku dniachzauwa¿ysz, ¿e nie ma ju¿ zmartwieñna póŸniej. Potem zacznieich brakowaæ, a¿ wreszcie zacznieszwidzieæ œmiesznoœæ tego ca-³ego procesu martwienia siê.Wypróbowane metody psychofizyczneobni¿ania napiêcia izmartwienia pozostawiê dla wyobraŸniczytelników. Ich popularnoœæspowodowa³a wiele skandalipolityków, a zastosowanie równie¿w œwiecie zwierzêcym spowodowa³o,¿e pewne gatunkima³p nie s¹ pokazywane w zachodnichogrodach zoologicznych.Poniewa¿ wymagaj¹ onepewnej motywacji, trudne s¹ dostosowania w bardziej zaawansowanymstanie zmartwienia.Dla ludzi z ¿y³k¹ techniczn¹ budowanieschematów logicznychmo¿e byæ bardzo przydatne. Narysujschemat blokowy, gdzie zewnêtrznezdarzenie lub po prostuspontaniczna myœl uderza i powodujeemocjonalny stan zmartwienia.U¿yj symbolikê i/lubbramkê prowadz¹c¹ do transformacjiniekontrolowanych emocjiw schematy logicznego myœlenia,prowadz¹ce do pozytywnych rozwi¹zañ.Jeœli nic z opisanego powy¿ejnie dzia³a, mamy do czynienia zpowa¿n¹ chorob¹, i wtedy pozostajepomoc psychologiczna lubpsychiatryczna.Mogê powiedzieæ z pe³nym optymizmem,¿e s¹ sposoby na pozbawieniesiê prawie wszystkichzmartwieñ. Potrzebna jest tylkoakceptacja grzechu martwienia siêi silne postanowienie poprawy.Œrodkiem prewencyjnym jestnieustanne rozwijanie poczuciahumoru, najlepszego lekarstwa nawiele schorzeñ, którego nie da siêprzedawkowaæ.What, Me Worry?Motto: Beware worry, a darkroomwhere negatives are developed“Adam’s infamous apple bitehas originated human worries. Itwas followed by a fearful thoughtof what God will do now.” I tendto challenge the above statement.Closer examination of the above,in combination with the observationthat seemingly women worrymore, leads to the followingcorrection: “Eve’s original sinproduced immediately at least twoworries: (a) a fearful thoughtabout committing a sin of thoughtwhen accepting the snake’s temptation,and (b) fearful thoughtsabout committing sins of wordand deed when passing onsnake’s arguments to Adam andconvincing him about eating theforbidden fruit. In any case, it israther obvious that humanityreceived their first worry from thesnake from hell. I hope I haveconvinced you, dear readers, thatworry is, beyond any doubt, adevil’s gift to humanity.The title of this article is aquote from the fictional mascotAlfred E. Neuman adopted by thefameous Mad Magazine. With histoothless grin of ultimate dumbnessit was easy to get the impressionthat worry was a good thing- if you didn’t worry you mightbe as dumb as Alfred. Alfred E.Neuman has been the featurecharacter of some 450 plus issuesof Mad Magazine, and is acopyright of Warner Brothers.Alfred E.Neumann-Pre-MadAlfred E.NeumannOver the decades, Alfred E.Neuman has often appeared inpolitical cartoons as a shorthandfor unquestioning stupidity. Inrecent years, Alfred E. Neuman’sfeatures have frequently beenmerged with those of presidentGeorge W. Bush. The image hasalso appeared on magazine coversand in numerous internet imagesin which Neuman’s face morphsinto Bush’s.<strong>No</strong>tice a huge differencebetween the two sets of pictures.There is no malice whatsowver inthe first set. In the second set,first picture, we can clearly seeundue darkness added to Dubya’seyes. The second picture featuresadded meanness and cynical grin,both absent in the real George W.Bush’s face.The alleged resemblance betweenAlfred and George hasbeen noted by Hilary Clinton. Shesaid, “I sometimes feel thatAlfred E. Neuman is in charge inWashington,” referring to Bush’sAlfred W.BushGeorge W.Bushpurported “What, me worry?”attitude.Below are two monologues I’vehad a luck to listen to during myrecent travels.An older gentleman startedsome small talk but rather quicklycame to the point. “You know,women tend to worry so much.For example my wife Susan.After some two years of the usualinfatuation, she would getangry at me when I refused toworry about things. She was15-30/04/2007 N o <strong>08</strong> (<strong>926</strong>)worried, “everybody else wasworried”, why wasn’t I? I keptexplaining to her again and again,that I have had learned a painfulway that worry does not accomplishanything. Her expressionsof worries would usuallyend with the statements like“grow up”, “you don’t care muchabout anything, do you”, “well,men are like children, nevermature enough to worry aboutthings”, etc. Many examplesfollowed, but I can recall onlysome juicy fragments of themsince, as permanently sleepdeficient, I tend to doze off occasionally.Another time a chatty,attractive young woman, who saidthat she considers herself anordinary girl with a very sarcasticsense of humor, started:“Worrying operating in minimalcapacity can prevent you frommaking a potentially dangerouschoice, or can help you fromforgetting something fairlyimportant. But, as in my case,when it’s on overdrive, it canraise your blood pressure, giveyou stomach ailments and turnyou into a paranoid freak ofnature immobilized and terrifiedof even the next breath, fearingthe mountain that may just havebeen a molehill.”“I am a notorious pendulumswinger”, she continued. “I’m allsomething or all another...but I’veyet to master just resting downthe middle of anything. Mygirlfriends are also constantlyfussing or dwelling on one thingor another to ensure everything isas it’s supposed to be. It’sexhausting. I’ve developed thehabit of cleverly fooling myselfinto believing I amthinking...when I’m actuallyworrying. In many cases, creatingcircumstances or potential futureevents and then worrying abouthow in the heck I am gonna clearthose hurdles when and if theycome to pass. How bizarre that Ispend so much of my timeforecasting, predicting andpreparing that I forget to live. “ Atthis point I asked her, if she worksin management. She said no, andexcitedly continued.“In a moment of exhaustion andlogic, while preparing my tea thismorning, I felt myself ramping upfor a conversation that could orcould not happen. I chewed on allthe different ways it could evolve.The circumstances, the way forme to behave and respond, thethings I should say, the things Ishould not. Considering that notone thing in the world ever seemsto happen exactly as we mighthave predicted it, I realized atonce that this was a tremendouswaste of my energy and time.” Iwanted to interject on how theconversation could evolve, butgave up realizing that the girl wasabout my oldest son’s age.“Fact is...unless I’ve had a clearvision of something to come...therest is silly conjecture. And evenif I script out the conversationperfectly, there is another personon the other end of it, who has theability to say and do things I willnot have accounted for in the heatContinued on page 15
N o <strong>08</strong> (<strong>926</strong>) 15-30/04/2007 Strona 15Continued from page 14of the moment. I liken it to a cat.To my knowledge, a cat doesn’tplan and plot it’s leap to a ledge.It simply believes it has the abilityand it leaps. If cats fall, they landon their feet and perhaps takemore of a running start next time.Of course...they sometimes getmowed over for some of theirdecisions...but we’ll get to thatanother time.”“I think to worry excessively isto trust with serious deficiency. Itis a belief that without properplanning and protection you aredestined to land in the middle of acatastrophe. It’s a belief that nospiritual guide or your owncommon sense or endurance willbe enough to carry you throughwhatever waits just around thecorner. I don’t know aboutyou...but I am tired of worryingabout the things that may or maynot happen. I think I’ll justcelebrate the solace of knowingno matter what comes up next, I’llhandle it - just like I always do.And if it kills me? Well thenwon’t be any sense worryingabout what happens next, causeits the end of the show.”What to do?Oh noChecking pregnancy test resultI’mworriedI listenedto her withawe andquiet astonishment.<strong>No</strong>w, sheseemed tohave calmeddown andcontinued:“As of now, I am erasing mymental hard drive of any scripts,play by play, and best defences. Ihope I am going to trust thatwhatever happens, I’ve got themental faculty and the courage todo whatever is required at thetime. Worry can kiss me goodbye.At least today...By the way, whatis this sudden turbulence andnoise?” “<strong>No</strong>thing special, thepilot just announced that we aregoing through some weatherdisturbances” I said. “O my god, Iknew it…My mother called meyesterday, advised not to fly, shehad a dream…I don’t want to die.What shall we do now?” “Thepilot recommended to wait it outfor a while, and assured it isroutine, nothing unusual” I said.“They always say it, don’t they.How can you trust him. He is aman, and men are incapable ofworrying!”What have I doneWhatnow?Personology’s Robert WhitesideTechnically about WorryWorst worries, as totally useless,are about past mishaps andhow that could be avoided. Let’slook at the more reasonableworries of the present and thefuture.Worry or negative fantasy canruin life in the present by bringngin an imaginary negative eventfrom the future. How can we getrid of this awful anticipatoryanxiety? Firstly, let us accept thatworry disease has been withhumanity for some 50,000 yearsand we will have to wait somemore 5 years until the worrygenes will be identified and it willhopefully lead to the final solution,i.e. a permanent removal.Meanwhile, let us consider someinterim solutions to ease pains ofworry for those unfortunates whosuffer.Worry is a misuse of imagination.When we are worrying aboutsomething we are essentiallyfantasizing about bad things thatmight happen. What’s the point?It sometimes helps to plan for thefuture, but it never helps to worryabout it. Worry often accompaniesanxiety disorders. When aperson has an anxiety attack or apanic attack it can be disruptiveand even immobilizing. This canlead to a fear of similar attacks. Ifthis fear gets strong enough ititself creates anxiety, and thisitself is sometimes enough totrigger another attack.Some 20 years ago someonerecommended to me a shortcourse in “Personology”. Developedby Robert Whiteside, basedon his qualitative not scientific,statistical analysis, Personology,similarly to finding water withdivining rods, has been neveraccepted as science. But,similarly to the divining rods, itworks. Below are, borrowed frommy old Robert Whiteside’s Personologyhandouts, two picturesLess worry eyesshowing three sets of eyes in twocategories of “less” and “more”worry.”Less worry eyes” depict, fromtop down, the glassy, glaring eyesof shock, “bride’s worry” i.e.person exerting beyond limits(both belong to the first stage ofworry), and dull, tired, bloodshotand glazed eyes of the exhaustedindividual (second stage ofworry).“More worry eyes” depict,from top down, “casualty trend”showing up in the prolonged stateof tension and worry (neveraccept a ride from the persondisplaying vertical imbalance inthe position of eye pupils. Atwork, send a worker home to restrather then possibly have anaccident), “melancholy” (built upunrelieved, unresolved tensionand worry), and finally eyes ofthe person “coming out of” melancholy,where the “spirit startsshining through”, where eventuallysparkling pupils will movedown to the centre of the eyes.SolutionsWhat’s the solution? Stopworrying. Remember that it isdevil’s gift to humanity; don’tyield to the devil’s ways. This iseasier said than done, of course.There are several different‘thought-stopping” techniquesthat can help. To start, diagnoseyourself by looking at the mirrorand comparing your eyes withones in this article. Are you in theless or more worry category, andwhere? Look at the last set ofeyes and see the difference.Imagine that your eyes will startshining again. <strong>No</strong>tice an unmistakablehope coming through thoseeyes. Visualize yourself there,and later, when pupils of youreyes will wander down, reach themiddle of your eyes, and sparkswill start flying.A popular, very effective wayinvolves wearing a rubber bandaround your wrist and snapping ithard whenever you catch yourselfworrying. Feel pain and yell“stop” to yourself, and shiftmental gears to think about somethingelse. It helps to have the“something else” in mind beforehand- a relaxing, or excitingimage or fantasy, or a compellingchallenge - or best a pre-arranged“worry-removal” ritual - that yourmind will latch onto.Another effective techniqueinvolves setting aside fixed timeto worry every day. This maysound counter productive, but itactually helps you gain controlover your thinking, and limitsyour worries to the prescribedhour or so. When you go to yourKonferencja“Wspó³czesnereaktory atomowedla energetyki”More worry eyesworry time, pace yourself so youcan have a chance to worry abouteverything you want. After severalexercises like that you willlaugh at all of it, realizing howridiculous your worry was.There are also old fashionpsycho-physical ways to relievetension and worry, and I willleave them to the reader’s imagination.They have contributed tomany scandals with celebritiesand politicians, and because oftheir explicit character certainbreeds of monkeys are not publiclydisplayed in western zoos.Needles to say, those effectivemethods require certain motivationand therefore can only beused in the earlier stages of theworry syndrome.For people technically minded,building mental flowcharts ormodels can also be very effective.Draw a diagram, where an outsideevent or random thought hits youremotions and generates worry.Set and/or gates, leading eventuallyto the total conversion fromuncontrolled, emotional state ofworry to cognitive, logic-solving,“can do” schemes.If nothing of the above works,consider counselling or therapy.Extreme worry is a form of obsessivethinking, and can be a partof an obsessive-compulsive disorder,depression, or other conditionrequiring medical treatment.To end on the positive note,there is a cure for almost anydysfunctional state of humanworry. Also, the best preventionis a continuous, on-going developmentof your sense of humour;a proven, organic medicine thatcannot be overdosed.Jan Jekie³ekZG Stowarzyszenia In¿ynierów Polskich w Kanadzie, w kooperacji z IEEEToronto organizuje konferencjê, w jêzyku angielskim, na temat “Wspó³czesnereaktory atomowe dla energetyki”. Na ca³ym œwiecie, w³¹czaj¹c w to Polskê iOntario, mówi siê o koniecznoœci budowania nowych elektrowni atomowych,temat jest wiêc na czasie. Na konferencji eksperci przedstawi¹ zalety i s³aboœcikilku konkuruj¹cych ze sob¹ typów reaktorów nuklearnych.Konferencja odbêdzie sie 24 maja w godz. 19:00-21:30, w budynku SPK,206 Beverly Street, Toronto, na górnej sali. Wstêp wolny. Uczestnicyzaproszeni s¹ od 18:00 do wziêcia udzia³u w “networking” w sali obrad. “Cashbar” bêdzie otwarty, jak równie¿ restauracja, w której mo¿na zamówiæ poprzystêpnych cenach wspania³e potrawy. Po prezentacjach ekspertów odbêdziesiê dyskusja. Serdecznie zapraszamy. Zarz¹d Glówny SIPwK.Conference “Reactor Designs For the Upcoming Nuclear StationsWorldwide”Association of Polish Engineers in Canada, in cooperation with IEEEToronto, organizes a Conference “Reactor Designs For the Upcoming NuclearStations Worldwide”. Currently there are over 400 operating nuclear powerreactors in the world, 30 more are under construction to go to operation in2007-2013, and another 8 committed for 2013-2017. It is also projected that by2050 there will be some 1,500 reactors worldwide. During the conference,experts will present strengths and weaknesses of the leading reactor designs.The conference will take place on Thursday, May 24, 2007, 7 – 9:30 p.m., inthe SPK Building, 206 Beverly Street, Toronto. Admission free. Participantsare invited to get involved in pre-conference networking from 6 p.m. Cash barwill be open, as well as a restaurant, where excellent food is available atreasonable prices. A discussion will follow experts’ presentations.