Rundbrief 1 - Verband für sozial-kulturelle Arbeit eV

fragmentiert und im Fluss. Um stark und verjüngt
zu werden, brauchen die Gemeinwesen eine Form
von Gemeinwesenaufbau, der die unterschiedlichen
Interessen im Gemeinwesen überbrücken kann und
eine Plattform für seine Mitglieder bietet, sich in permanenter
Aushandlung mit dem Ziel strategischer
Solidarität zu engagieren. Mit seinem geschichtlich
verbürgten Erfolg bei der Brückenbildung über gesellschaftliche
Unterschiede hinweg und bei der Generierung
sozialen Kapitals, spielt das Settlement-Haus
eine wichtige Rolle im Gemeinwesenaufbau unter
den Bedingungen der Globalisierung. Die Wiederbelebung
des Settlement-Hauses ist eine Verpflichtung
auch für die Sozialarbeits-Profession, eine Profession,
die ihre Wurzeln in der Settlement-Bewegung und
eine Aufgabe im Gemeinwesenaufbau hat.
Übersetzt von Herbert Scherer
Abdruck mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Haworth Press
Inc.
Das Original des Artikels ist unter dem Titel
„Bridging the Fragmented Community: Revitalizing
Settlement Houses in the Global Era“ im Journal of
Community Practice, Vol. 12(1/2) 2004 erschienen
© des englischen Originals Haworth Document Delivery
Service: 1-800-HAWORTH.
Der Originaltext kann hier (gegen Gebühr) bezogen
werden.
E-mail address: docdelivery@haworthpress.com
Konditionen auf der Website von Haworth Press: http:
//www.haworthpress.com/web/COM
Abel, E. K. (1979). Toynbee Hall, 1884-1914. Social Service Review, 53(4), 606-632.
Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512-526.
Addams, J. (1999). Twenty Years at Hull House. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Albrow, M. (1993). Globalization. In W. Outhwaite & T. Bottomore (Eds.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought (pp. 248-249). England: Oxford: Blackwell.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities (2nd ed.). London and New York: Verso.
Andrews, J. (1997). Helen Hall and the Settlement House Movement’s response to unemployment: Reaching out to the community. Journal of Community Practice, 4(2), 65-75.
Armitage, A. (1991). Social Welfare in Canada: Ideals, Realities, and Future Paths (2nd ed.). Toronto: McCelland & Stewart.
Berman-Rossi, T.,&Miller, I. (1994). African-Americans and the settlements during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Social Work with Groups, 17(3), 7-95.
Bottomore, T. (1979). Political Sociology. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Carson, M. (1990). Settlement Folk: Social Thought and the American Settlement Movement, 1885-1930. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Chesler, E. (1996). “Back to the Future”: Reviving the settlement house as neighborhood social service center. In J. Vitullo-Martin (Ed.), Breaking Away: The Future of Cities (pp. 121-134).
New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund Press.
Chow, N. (1980). Social Welfare in Hong Kong: Development and Policies (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Publisher.
Cox, E. O. (2001). Community practice issues in the 21st Century: Questions and challenges for empowerment-oriented practitioners. Journal of Community Practice, 9(1), 37-55.
Drover, G. (2000). Redefining social citizenship in a global era. Canadian Social Work (Social Work and Globalization: Special Issue), 2(1), 29-49.
Epstein, L. (1999). The culture of social work. In A. S. Chambon, A. Irving, & L. Epstein (Eds.), Reading Foucault for Social Work (1 ed., pp. 3-26). New York: Columbia University Press.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.
Fabricant, M. B.,& Fisher, R. (2002). Settlement Houses Under Siege: The Struggle to Sustain Community Organization in New York City. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Ferguson, R. F., & Dickens, W. T. (1999). Introduction. In R. F. Ferguson, & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban Problems and Community Development (pp. 1-31). Washington, DC: Brookings
Institution Press.
Fisher, R., & Fabricant, M. B. (2002). From Henry Street to contracted services: Financing the settlement house. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXIX(3), 2-27.
Fisher, R., & Kling, J. (1997). Community organization, new social movement theory and the condition of postmodernity. In D. J. Tucker, C. Garvin,&R. Sarri (Eds.), Integrating Knowledge
and Practice: The Case of Social Work and Social Science (pp. 105-115). Westport, CT: Praeger Publisher.
Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A.,& Dahrendorf, R. (Winter, 2001). September 11. LSE Magazine, 13, 4-6. 66 JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE
Glyn, A. (1998). Egalitarianism in a global economy. Boston Review. Retrieved on November 22, 2003 at http://www.bostonreview.net/BR22.6/glyn.html.
Hall, J. A. (1995). In search of civil society. In J. A. Hall (Ed.), Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison (pp. 1-31). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hasson, S., & Ley, D. (1994). Neighbourhood Organizations and the Welfare State. Toronto, On.: University of Toronto Press.
Hayes, K. S. (1998). The one hundred-year debate: Social reform versus individual treatment. Social Work, 43(6), 501-509.
Haynes, D. T., & White, B. W. (1999). Will the „real“ social work please stand up A call to stand for professional unity. Social Work, 44(4), 385-391.
Hillman, A. (1960a). Neighbourhood Centres Today: Action Program for a Rapidly Changing World. New York: National Federation of Settlements and Neighbourhood Centres.
Hillman, A. (1960b). Neighbourhood Centres Today: Action Program for a Rapidly Changing World. New York: National Federation of Settlements and Neighbourhood Centres.
Hiroto, J. M., Brown, P.,&Martin, N. (1997). Building Community: The Tradition and Promise of Settlement Houses. New York, NY: United Neighborhood Houses of New York.
Husock, H. (1993). Bring back the settlement house: Settlements see poor people as citizens, not clients. Public Welfare, 51(4), 16-25.
Ife, J. (2000). Localized needs and a globalized economy: Bridging the gap with social work practice. Canadian Social Work (Social Work and Globalization: Special Issue), 2(1), 50-64.
Irving, A., Parsons, H., & Bellamy, D. (Eds.) (1995). Neighbours: Three Social Settlements in Downtown Toronto. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Johnson, A. K. (1998). The revitalization of community practice: Characteristics, competencies, and curricula for community-based practices. Journal of Community Practice, 5(3), 37-62.
Kaul, M. L. (1988). Developing neighbourhood organizations as social structures for peace. International Social Work, 31, 45-52.
Klein, P. (1968). From Philanthropy to Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Koerin, B. (2003). The settlement house tradition: Current trends and future concern. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXX(2), 53-68.
Lasch, C. (Ed.) (1965). The Social Thought of Jane Addams. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.
Lasch-Quinn, E. (1993). Black Neighbors: Race and the Limits of Reform in the American Settlement House Movement, 1890-1945. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina
Press.
Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern Welfare. London: SAGE.
Miu Chung Yan 67 Lissak, R. S. (1989). Pluralism & Progressives: Hull House and the New Immigrants, 1890-1919. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McQuaig, L. (1999). The Cult of Impotence: Selling the Myth of Powerlessness in the Global Economy. Toronto, ON: Penguin.
Midgley, J. (2000). Globalization, capitalism, and social welfare: A social development perspective. Canadian Social Work (Social Work and Globalization: Special Issue), 2(1), 13-28.
Mishra, R. (1999). After globalization: Social policy in an open economy. Canadian Review of Social Policy (43), 13-28.
Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. (1998). „A whole lot of organizing going on”: The status and needs of organizers in community-based organizations. Journal of Community Practice, 5(4), 1-24.
Perez-Diaz, V. (1995). The possibility of civil society: Traditions, character, and challenges. In J. Hall (Ed.), Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison (pp. 80-109). Cambridge, UK: Polity
Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: A Touchstone Book.
Ramey, J. H. (1992). Group work practice in neighborhood centers today. The Haworth Press, Inc. 193-206.
Reinders, R. C. (1982). Toynbee Hall and the American settlement movement. Social Service Review, 56(1), 39-54.
Rivera, F. G., & Erlich, J. L. (1981). Neo-Gemeinschaft minority communities: Implications for community organization in the United States. Community Development Journal, 16(3), 189-
200.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shore, C. (1993). Community. In W. Outhwaite,&T. Bottomore (Eds.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought (pp. 98-99). England: Oxford: Blackwell.
Sites, W. (1998). Communitarian theory and community development in the United States. Community Development Journal, 33(1), 57-65.
Smith, G. (1996). Ties, nets, and an elastic bund: Community in the postmodern city. Community Development Journal, 31(3), 250-259.
Specht, H.,&Courtney, M. E. (1994). Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work Has Abandoned Its Mission (1 ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Trolander, J. A. (1987). Professionalism and Social Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
Weil, M. (1997). Introduction: Models of community practice in action. Journal of Community Practice, 4(1), 1-9.
Wharf, B. (1998). Local Governance. In B. Wharf, & B. McKenzie (Eds.), Connecting Policy to Practice in the Human Services. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press. 68 JOURNAL OF
COMMUNITY PRACTICE
Wharf, B., & Clague, M. (1997). Lessons and legacies. In B. Wharf, & M. Clague (Eds.), Community Organizing: Canadian Experiences (pp. 302-325). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Yan, M. C. (1998). Towards a complete view of the social policy process: An integration of policy formulation and implementation. Canadian Review of Social Policy, Winter 1988(42), 37-53.
Yan, M. C. (2002a). Recapturing the history of Settlement House Movement: Its philosophy, service model, and implications in China’s development of community- based centre services.
Asian Pacifi c Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 21-40.
Yan, M. C. (2002b). Reclaiming the social of social group work: An experience of a community center in Hong Kong. Social Work with Groups, 12(1), 21-40. Miu Chung Yan 69
12