04.09.2017 Aufrufe

atw 2017-09

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 8/9 ı August/September<br />

ENERGY POLICY, ECONOMY AND LAW 516<br />

commercial reactor in the US at the time. Ikata 1 was due<br />

to end its 40-year operating period in September <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

Novovoronezh 3 was the oldest VVER 440 reactor in<br />

­operation, first producing electricity 45 years previously.<br />

| | Fig. 3.<br />

Regional generation of nuclear electricity, North America, South America,<br />

Africa, West & Central Europe, East Europe & Russia, Asia.<br />

In 2016 nuclear generation was higher in all regions<br />

­except Western and Central Europe, compared to the<br />

­average annual generation in the preceding five years<br />

(Figure 3). Nuclear output rose most markedly in Asia,<br />

with generation 72 TWh higher than the 2011-2015<br />

average.<br />

In 2014 the share of nuclear generation in the global<br />

electricity generation mix held steady at 10.6%, ­unchanged<br />

from 2013. In those countries that have nuclear generation<br />

the share supplied by nuclear rose from 12.3 % in 2013 to<br />

13.6 % in 2014 (Figure 4).<br />

­total electricity supply has stabilized. The continuing<br />

increase in nuclear generation seen over the last two years<br />

should see these trends continue.<br />

Operational performance<br />

The World Nuclear Performance Report assesses reactors<br />

capacity factors based on the performance of those ­reactors<br />

that generated electricity during each calendar year<br />

(Figure 5). This omits those reactors, such as those<br />

­awaiting restart in Japan, that are classed as operable, but<br />

did not generate. This treatment gives a better indication<br />

of the long term performance trends of operating reactors.<br />

There have been two phases in the trends for reactor<br />

performance in terms of global average capacity factor.<br />

Since around 2001 the global average capacity factor has<br />

held at around 80 %. Prior to this phase there was an<br />

­approximately 30 year period of steady improvement.<br />

In 2016 the global average capacity factor was 80.5 %, in<br />

comparison to 81.0 % in 2015.<br />

Although the global overage average has stabilized<br />

there are variations, with some regions achieving higher<br />

capacity factors (Figure 6). In North America capacity<br />

­factors approached 90 %, for example.<br />

| | Fig. 6.<br />

Capacity factor by region, North America, South America, Africa,<br />

West & Central Europe, East Europe & Russia, Asia.<br />

Since 1996 the share of nuclear generation in the global<br />

energy mix has fallen from a peak of around 17 % to just<br />

over 10 %. This decline in the overall share is in part due to<br />

an increase in global electricity demand and in part<br />

­because a decline in nuclear generation, particularly in<br />

2011 and 2012, in response to the Fukushima accident.<br />

However, as nuclear generation started to increase<br />

again from 2012 the share of nuclear generation in the<br />

| | Fig. 5.<br />

Global average capacity factor 1970 to 2016.<br />

| | Fig. 4.<br />

Share of nuclear generation in total electricity supply.<br />

Capacity factors are also broadly consistent with the<br />

­average achieved in the preceding five years for reactors in<br />

different regions. The greatest variation is seen in regions<br />

represented by a smaller number of reactors where the<br />

­regular schedule of outages results in variations in average<br />

regional capacity factors.<br />

The percentage of reactors reaching specific capacity<br />

factors in 2016, compared to the average for each year over<br />

the preceding five years has remained fairly consistent<br />

over this period and there has been no significant change<br />

to the spread of capacity factors achieved across the fleet<br />

either (Figure 7).<br />

The chart shows that there remains some scope for<br />

improvements in the performance of those reactors with<br />

lower than average capacity factors. However, in some<br />

­cases reactors are being used in a load-following mode that<br />

means their output is reduced to help balance variations in<br />

demand and supply from other generators, with a ­resulting<br />

reduction in capacity factor.<br />

There has been ongoing improvement of reactors<br />

­reaching higher capacity factors over the last 40 years<br />

(­Figure 8). For example, 64 % of reactors achieved<br />

­capacity factor higher than 80 % in 2016, compared to<br />

24 % in 1976, whereas only 8 % of reactors had a capacity<br />

factor lower than 50 % in 2016, compared to 22 % in 1976.<br />

One area of interest is the performance of reactors over<br />

their lifetime. Extended operations are increasingly<br />

Energy Policy, Economy and Law<br />

World Nuclear Performance Report <strong>2017</strong> ı Jonathan Cobb

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!