19.02.2013 Views

Blaga P. Lectures on the differential geometry of - tiera.ru

Blaga P. Lectures on the differential geometry of - tiera.ru

Blaga P. Lectures on the differential geometry of - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 Chapter 4. General <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> surfaces<br />

4.19.3 Geodesic lines<br />

Definiti<strong>on</strong> 4.19.1. Let S be a surface. A parameterized curve ρ : I → S is called a<br />

geodesic line, or simply, a geodesic if, at each point, its geodesic curvature vanishes.<br />

Remark. According to <strong>the</strong> formula (4.19.12), <strong>the</strong> geodesic curvature <strong>of</strong> a curve can be<br />

written as<br />

kg = (τ, τ ′ , n).<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, from <strong>the</strong> first formula <strong>of</strong> Frenet, τ × τ ′ = kβ, <strong>the</strong>refore, kg vanishes at<br />

a point <strong>of</strong> a curve <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface if and <strong>on</strong>ly if <strong>the</strong> binormal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curve is perpendicular<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> normal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface at that point or, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> geodesic curvature<br />

vanishes if and <strong>on</strong>ly if <strong>the</strong> normal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface is c<strong>on</strong>tained in <strong>the</strong> osculating plane.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> geodesic lines are exactly those lines <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface for which <strong>the</strong> osculating<br />

plane at each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir points c<strong>on</strong>tain <strong>the</strong> normal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface at that point. In fact, in<br />

many books, this property is taken as <strong>the</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> geodesics.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r remark that should be made is that since, as we noticed earlier, <strong>the</strong> geodesic<br />

curvature is <strong>the</strong> signed curvature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curve <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> tangent plane,<br />

we can say that <strong>the</strong> geodesics are those curves which project <strong>on</strong> each tangent plane <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> surface after a straight line. In this sense, we might say that <strong>the</strong> geodesics are <strong>the</strong><br />

straightest lines <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> surfaces.<br />

The formula 4.19.9 leads to<br />

Theorem 4.5. The <strong>differential</strong> equati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> geodesic lines is<br />

Γ 2 11u′3 + � 2Γ 2 12 − Γ1 � �<br />

′2 ′ 2<br />

11 u v + Γ22 − 2Γ 1 �<br />

′ ′2 1<br />

12 u v − Γ22v ′3 + u ′ v ′′ − u ′′ v ′ = 0. (4.19.11)<br />

Also, from (4.19.10) we can deduce that<br />

Theorem 4.6. The geodesic lines verify <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> <strong>differential</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ u<br />

⎪⎩<br />

′′ + u ′2Γ1 11 + 2u′ v ′ Γ1 12 + v′2Γ1 22 = 0<br />

. (4.19.12)<br />

= 0<br />

v ′′ + u ′2 Γ 2 11 + 2u′ v ′ Γ 2 12 + v′2 Γ 2 22<br />

There is, apparently, a c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> previous two <strong>the</strong>orems, as <strong>the</strong> first<br />

claim that <strong>the</strong> geodesics are soluti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a single equati<strong>on</strong>s, while <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d – that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are a soluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> different equati<strong>on</strong>. In fact, however, <strong>the</strong> two equati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

system (4.19.12) are not independent, because we impose <strong>the</strong> geodesics to be naturally<br />

parameterized, <strong>the</strong>refore, between <strong>the</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>s u and v <strong>the</strong>re is an extra relati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The existence (locally, at least) <strong>of</strong> geodesics passing through a point <strong>of</strong> a surface and<br />

having at that point a given tangent vector is a c<strong>on</strong>sequence <strong>of</strong> standard results in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> ordinary <strong>differential</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s. Finding geodesics, is, usually, a very delicate<br />

business and can be d<strong>on</strong>e explicitly <strong>on</strong>ly in special situati<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!