21.02.2013 Views

San Francisco Film Society Oral History Project Interview with ...

San Francisco Film Society Oral History Project Interview with ...

San Francisco Film Society Oral History Project Interview with ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLAUDE JARMAN: I regret that we had that falling out <strong>with</strong> Albert. That was unfortunate that we<br />

couldn’t get along, because I know the Festival meant an awful lot to him. I regret that he didn’t come<br />

around to seeing things that we felt were necessary and that were important to the survival of the<br />

Festival. I had to make some hard decisions financially that I probably would have preferred not to have<br />

had to make, being frugal in certain aspects, and say, “Hey, we can’t afford it.” There was a lot of<br />

criticism that the Festival was too commercial, that we didn’t show enough experimental films, but we<br />

could never survive by doing that. It just wasn’t going to happen. The city could not support it. So I<br />

think we put together an event where every evening was an event, and not just spread out all over the<br />

city. I do see that the Festival now has got a tremendous amount of wide-ranging support, which I think<br />

is great. More power to them; I wish we had been able to do that. We tried to not be more ambitious than<br />

we could handle.<br />

MARGARITA LANDAZURI: How do you think the Festival has changed for the better or for the worse<br />

since your day?<br />

CLAUDE JARMAN: I really don’t know because I don’t attend it that much. I know they’re having the<br />

same problems they’ve always had— The problem of getting good films. I usually go to the Peter<br />

Owens Awards because Peter was personally a very close friend of mine. But I don’t know. They seem<br />

to be thriving. I guess maybe because I just have so many other irons in the fire that it’s really hard for<br />

me to say what goes on because I don’t have the opportunity to attend that many events. No way would I<br />

knock what they’re doing. I think they’re doing what they see as best. They’ve got a good board of<br />

directors. But it doesn’t have—particularly on the tribute side—it doesn’t have the depth that we had.<br />

You look back and we had four, five, six people every year, and they were stars, and they were proven<br />

stars in their own right. And that’s just hard to do right now, I believe.<br />

MARGARITA LANDAZURI: Well the nature of the business has changed, too.<br />

CLAUDE JARMAN: Exactly. So they’ve changed <strong>with</strong> it, as probably they’ve had to.<br />

MARGARITA LANDAZURI: And of course there was only one Albert Johnson.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!