06.03.2013 Views

QUANTA SERVICES INC, QUANTA SERVICES MANAGEMENT ...

QUANTA SERVICES INC, QUANTA SERVICES MANAGEMENT ...

QUANTA SERVICES INC, QUANTA SERVICES MANAGEMENT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>QUANTA</strong> <strong>SERVICES</strong>, <strong>INC</strong>. AND SUBSIDIARIES<br />

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)<br />

effort, that quantitative information may be omitted, although the employer should describe what information has<br />

been omitted and why. The required disclosures must be provided retrospectively for all prior periods presented.<br />

The adoption of ASU 2011-09 did not have a material impact on Quanta’s consolidated financial position, results<br />

of operations or cash flows but did impact the disclosures in the notes to its consolidated financial statements.<br />

See Note 12 for the disclosures related to Quanta’s participation in multi-employer plans.<br />

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value<br />

Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure<br />

Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (ASU 2011-04), which is effective for annual reporting periods<br />

beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements<br />

related to fair value measurements. Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair<br />

value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation<br />

processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in<br />

the unobservable inputs; (2) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest<br />

and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which<br />

disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were<br />

determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.<br />

Quanta adopted ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012. Quanta does not anticipate that ASU 2011-04 will have a<br />

material impact on its consolidated financial statements but will consider whether any additional disclosures are<br />

necessary.<br />

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of<br />

Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2011-05), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after<br />

December 15, 2011. Accordingly, Quanta adopted ASU 2011-05 on January 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates<br />

the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in<br />

stockholders’ equity. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in<br />

financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of<br />

income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive<br />

income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on Quanta’s disclosures.<br />

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted<br />

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):<br />

Testing Goodwill for Impairment (the revised standard)” (ASU 2011-08), which is effective for annual and<br />

interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance<br />

gives entities the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the<br />

current two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes that, as a result of its qualitative assessment, it is<br />

more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative<br />

impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. An entity can choose to perform the<br />

qualitative assessment on none, some or all of its reporting units. An entity can also bypass the qualitative<br />

assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then<br />

resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. ASU 2011-08 also includes new<br />

qualitative indicators that replace those currently used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test<br />

is required to be performed. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have a material impact on Quanta’s<br />

financial position, results of operations or cash flows.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!