20.03.2013 Views

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

estimated that these items and services account for about<br />

3.8 percent of the total payment per treatment (Centers for<br />

<strong>Medicare</strong> & Medicaid Services 2010).<br />

Excluding items and services that <strong>Medicare</strong> paid other<br />

providers (not dialysis facilities) to furnish in prior<br />

years, we estimate that in 2011, <strong>Medicare</strong> expenditures<br />

were about $9.6 billion, an increase of about 1 percent<br />

compared with 2010 spending levels. After those items<br />

and services were included in the new payment bundle,<br />

<strong>Medicare</strong> expenditures totaled $10.1 billion. Freestanding<br />

facilities accounted for 92 percent of the spending total<br />

(about $9.3 billion in 2011).<br />

Between 2007 and 2009, per capita annual spending<br />

increased by an average of 1.7 percent per year, partly<br />

due to increasing use of injectable dialysis drugs (Figure<br />

6-4). Between 2009 and 2010, spending per beneficiary<br />

decreased by 0.5 percent. The decline in per beneficiary<br />

spending in 2010 was primarily due to the lower volume<br />

of ESAs furnished to beneficiaries in 2010.<br />

Excluding services furnished by other providers in<br />

prior years, we estimate that, in 2011, dialysis spending<br />

averaged about $26,600 per FFS dialysis beneficiary<br />

(Figure 6-4), a 0.3 percent increase from 2010. The change<br />

in total per beneficiary spending between 2010 and 2011<br />

also reflects the MIPPA-mandated 2 percent reduction in<br />

total ESRD spending and a transitional budget-neutrality<br />

adjuster of 3.1 percent to the base payment rate that CMS<br />

implemented between January and March 2011.<br />

summary of last year’s analysis of <strong>Medicare</strong><br />

payments and providers’ costs<br />

In our March 2012 report, we found that:<br />

• Between 2005 and 2010, the cost per treatment<br />

for services paid under the former composite rate<br />

payment system using the composite rate rose by an<br />

average of 2.5 percent per year. Variation from this<br />

average across freestanding dialysis facilities shows<br />

that some facilities were able to hold their cost growth<br />

well below that of others. For example, between 2005<br />

and 2010, per treatment costs increased by 0.7 percent<br />

per year for facilities in the 25th percentile of cost<br />

growth, compared with 4.2 percent for facilities in the<br />

75th percentile.<br />

• For 2010, we estimated the <strong>Medicare</strong> margin for<br />

composite rate services and dialysis drugs at 2.3<br />

percent. The distribution of margins in 2010 showed<br />

wide variation in performance among freestanding<br />

Spending per FFS beneficiary (in dollars)<br />

FIGURE<br />

FIguRe 6-2<br />

6–4<br />

26,800<br />

26,600<br />

26,400<br />

26,200<br />

26,000<br />

25,800<br />

25,600<br />

25,400<br />

25,200<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

Per capita spending....<br />

spending for dialysis<br />

services, 2007–2011<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

Note: FFS (fee-for-service). The payment per beneficiary for 2011 was adjusted<br />

by excluding the payment for services furnished by other providers in prior<br />

payment years (laboratory services, durable medical equipment, and the<br />

oral equivalent of Part B dialysis drugs). This adjustment was estimated<br />

based on CMS data reported in the 2010 final rule for the end-stage renal<br />

disease prospective payment system (Centers for <strong>Medicare</strong> & Medicaid<br />

Services 2010).<br />

Source: MedPAC analysis of 2007–2011 claims submitted by dialysis facilities to<br />

CMS.<br />

facilities. One-quarter of facilities had margins at or<br />

below –6.7 percent and one-quarter of facilities had<br />

<strong>Medicare</strong> margins of at least 11.9 percent.<br />

• On the basis of 2010 payment and cost data, we<br />

projected Notes a 2012 about aggregate this margin graph: of 2.7 percent.<br />

outpatient • Data dialysis is in <strong>Medicare</strong> the datasheet. margins Make for updates in the d<br />

2011 and • 2013 I reformatted the years from the x-axis.<br />

Our estimate • of I had the <strong>Medicare</strong> to manually margin draw is based tick on marks the most and axis lines<br />

current cost and payment data available for freestanding<br />

dialysis facilities: • Use 2010 direct cost selection reports and tool 2011 to select <strong>Medicare</strong> items for modifi<br />

claims data. default Because when 2011 dialysis you change facility the cost data. reports<br />

are not yet available, • Use paragraph we estimate styles a range (and for the object 2011 styles) to forma<br />

<strong>Medicare</strong> margin of 2 percent to 3 percent, and we project<br />

that the 2013 <strong>Medicare</strong> margin will be in the range of 3<br />

percent to 4 percent. The lower end of the range reflects<br />

a more conservative assumption about the efficiencies<br />

Report to the Congress: <strong>Medicare</strong> <strong>Payment</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> | March 2013<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!