20.03.2013 Views

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FIguRe<br />

FIGURE<br />

Program spending (in billions)<br />

8–3<br />

7-5<br />

$35<br />

$30<br />

$25<br />

$20<br />

$15<br />

$10<br />

$5<br />

overpayments in Overpayments...<br />

2011 sparked<br />

spike in program spending on snFs<br />

Note: SNF (skilled nursing facility), FFS (fee-for-service). Data for 2012 are<br />

estimates.<br />

Source: CMS, Office of the Actuary, 2012.<br />

Spending per<br />

FFS beneficiary<br />

Program spending<br />

10 percent of freestanding facilities furnished relatively<br />

low-cost, high-quality care and had substantial <strong>Medicare</strong><br />

margins over three consecutive years. 20 Note: Note and Source in InDesign. Compared with<br />

the average, relatively efficient SNFs had costs per day<br />

that were 10 percent lower (adjusted for differences<br />

in wages and case mix), quality measures that were<br />

considerably better (17 percent lower rehospitalization<br />

rates and 38 Notes percent higher about community this graph: discharge rates),<br />

and <strong>Medicare</strong> margins of 22 percent (<strong>Medicare</strong> <strong>Payment</strong><br />

Advisory Commission • I did this 2012). all manually, MA plans’ since payments, it has which two axes.<br />

were considerably lower than <strong>Medicare</strong>’s FFS payments,<br />

are unlikely to be explained by differences in patient mix.<br />

trends in spending and cost growth<br />

In 2012, the Office of the Actuary projects program FFS<br />

spending for SNF services to be $30.4 billion (Figure<br />

8-3). In 2011, payments were unusually high because the<br />

rates included an adjustment for implementation of the<br />

new case-mix classification system. Once 2011 data were<br />

available, it became clear the adjustment was too large and<br />

the resulting payment rates had been set too high. Thus,<br />

CMS revised the adjustment downward in 2012, putting<br />

spending back in line with previous trends. After the<br />

reductions, 2012 rates were 3.7 percent higher than those<br />

in 2010. Even though rates were lowered, total spending<br />

0<br />

Note: Note and Source in InDesign.<br />

172 Skilled nursing facility services: Assessing payment adequacy and updating payments<br />

$900<br />

$800<br />

$700<br />

$600<br />

$500<br />

$400<br />

$300<br />

$200<br />

$100<br />

$0<br />

$0<br />

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012<br />

Spending per FFS beneficiary<br />

in 2012 was projected to be 12 percent higher than it was<br />

in 2010. On a per FFS beneficiary basis, spending in 2011<br />

was $871.<br />

Between 1999 and 2011, the cumulative increase in cost<br />

35<br />

per day (49 percent) outpaced the market basket updates.<br />

30 <strong>Payment</strong>s rose far faster than either of these (84 percent),<br />

reflecting changes in the provision of therapy that resulted<br />

25 in more days classified as higher payment case-mix groups<br />

(Figure 8-4).<br />

20<br />

snF <strong>Medicare</strong> margins continue to grow<br />

15<br />

The <strong>Medicare</strong> margin is a key measure of the adequacy of<br />

the program’s payments because it compares <strong>Medicare</strong>’s<br />

10<br />

payments with costs to treat beneficiaries. An all-payer<br />

5 total margin, in contrast, reflects the financial performance<br />

of the entire facility across all lines of business (such as<br />

0 ancillary and therapy services, hospice, and home health<br />

care) and all payers. Total margins are presented as context<br />

for the Commission’s update recommendation.<br />

Because <strong>Medicare</strong> cost reports were not available to<br />

conduct our margin analysis for 2011, we estimated a<br />

range of margins for that year. We modeled revenues for<br />

FIguRe FIGURE<br />

Cumulative percent change<br />

8–4 7-4<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

1999<br />

Note: *Estimated.<br />

Cumulative change...<br />

Cumulative change in payments<br />

per day, costs per day, and market<br />

basket update since 1999<br />

<strong>Payment</strong> per day<br />

Cost per day<br />

Market basket<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

2001<br />

15<br />

2003<br />

2005<br />

2007<br />

2009<br />

2011*<br />

Source: MedPAC analysis 10 of freestanding skilled nursing facility <strong>Medicare</strong> cost<br />

reports from 1999 to 2010, estimates of 2011 revenues and costs, and<br />

Federal Register final rules for skilled nursing facility services for fiscal<br />

years 1999 to 52011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!