20.03.2013 Views

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

Medicare Payment Policy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIguRe FIGURE<br />

15–1<br />

15-1<br />

Enrollment in millions<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

Note: PDP (prescription drug plan), MA–PD (<strong>Medicare</strong> Advantage–Prescription Drug [plan]).<br />

Source: MedPAC analysis of CMS landscape, plan report, and enrollment data.<br />

PDP enrollees...<br />

pDp enrollees are less likely to have benefits in the coverage gap<br />

PDPs MA–PDs<br />

2012<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2006<br />

Drugs covered in the gap<br />

were in plans that offered benefits in the coverage gap Some generics In 2010, but about no 28 brand-name percent of Part drugs D enrollees had 1.2 1.2 2.2<br />

beyond what is required by PPACA. However, over Some 40 generics spending and high some enough brand-name to put them in drugs the coverage 0.2 gap, 0.4 a<br />

percent of PDP enrollees received Part D’s LIS, which None decrease 3.6 from 3.3 over 30 2.1 percent 2.4 in previous 2.9 years 3.9(Figure<br />

effectively eliminated their coverage gap. By comparison, 15-2, p. 344). Part D enrollees who entered the coverage<br />

1.4<br />

52 percent of MA−PD enrollees were in plans offering gap in 2010 faced 100 percent of the plan’s negotiated<br />

gap coverage. About half of these enrollees were in plans price of the drug for prescriptions filled in the coverage<br />

that covered some generics but not brand-name drugs in gap, unless they were in a plan that provided some<br />

the gap.<br />

Notes about this graph:<br />

benefits in the gap or were an LIS enrollee, for whom the<br />

gap is eliminated. LIS enrollees accounted for more than<br />

use • of Data part is D in benefits the datasheet. and share Make of updates enrollees in the datasheet. half of the enrollees with spending high enough to reach<br />

reaching the coverage gap<br />

the coverage gap (nearly 4.7 million, or about 16 percent<br />

• I reformatted the years from the x-axis.<br />

Prescription drugs are used widely by <strong>Medicare</strong><br />

of all Part D enrollees). Slightly over 2.6 million, or about<br />

beneficiaries. • I had According to manually to the draw Commission’s tick marks analysis and axis lines 9 because percent of they Part D kept enrollees, resetting had when spending I changed high enough any data.<br />

of 2010 • Use prescription direct selection drug event tool data to taken select from items Part for modification. to reach Part Otherwise D’s catastrophic if you use coverage the black phase. selection About 2 tool, they w<br />

D claims, default about when 93 percent you change of Part D the enrollees data. filled at million of them (7 percent of Part D enrollees) received<br />

least one prescription during the year. Enrollees filled an the LIS.<br />

• Use paragraph styles (and object styles) to format.<br />

average of 4.2 prescriptions per month, with considerably<br />

higher average utilization among those who received the<br />

LIS (5.1 per month) than among beneficiaries who did not<br />

Most part D enrollees have good access to<br />

prescription drugs<br />

(3.7 per month).<br />

Surveys indicate that beneficiaries enrolled in Part D are<br />

generally satisfied with the Part D program and with their<br />

2007<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

No gap<br />

coverage<br />

Some generics<br />

and some<br />

brand-name<br />

drugs in the<br />

coverage gap<br />

Some generics<br />

but no<br />

brand-name<br />

drugs in the<br />

coverage gap<br />

Report to the Congress: <strong>Medicare</strong> <strong>Payment</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> | March 2013<br />

343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!