22.03.2013 Views

Your document headline

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This case study is concerned with subsequent costs.<br />

Facts<br />

CASE STUDY 1<br />

Road Truckers Inc. has acquired a heavy road transporter at a cost of $100,000 (with no breakdown of the component parts). The estimated useful life is<br />

ten years. At the end of the sixth year, the power train requires replacement, as further maintenance is uneconomical due to the off-road time required. The<br />

remainder of the vehicle is perfectly roadworthy and is expected to last for the next four years. The cost of a new power train is $45,000.<br />

Required<br />

Can the cost of the new power train be recognized as an asset, and, if so, what treatment should be used?<br />

Solution<br />

The new power train will produce economic benefits to Road Truckers Inc., and the cost is measurable. Hence the item should be recognized as an asset.<br />

The original invoice for the transporter did not specify the cost of the power train; however, the cost of the replacement—$45,000—can be used as an<br />

indication (usually by discounting) of the likely cost, six years previously. If an appropriate discount rate is 5% per annum, $45,000 discounted back six<br />

years amounts to $33,500 [$45,000/(1.05)] 6 , which would be written out of the asset records. The cost of the new power train, $45,000, would be added to<br />

the asset record, resulting in a new asset cost of $111,500 ($100,000 – $33,500 + $45,000).<br />

Measurement at Recognition<br />

An item of property, plant, and equipment that satisfies the recognition criteria should be recognized initially at its cost. The Standard specifies that cost comprises<br />

• Purchase price, including import duties, nonrefundable purchase taxes, less trade discounts and rebates<br />

• Costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be used in a manner intended by the entity<br />

• Initial estimates of dismantling, removing, and site restoration if the entity has an obligation that it incurs on acquisition of the asset or as a result of using the<br />

asset other than to produce inventories<br />

Examples of directly attributable costs include<br />

• Employee benefits of those involved in the construction or acquisition of an asset<br />

• Cost of site preparation<br />

• Initial delivery and handling costs<br />

• Installation and assembly costs<br />

• Costs of testing, less the net proceeds from the sale of any product arising from test production<br />

• Borrowing costs to the extent permitted by IAS 23, Borrowing Costs<br />

• Professional fees<br />

Examples of costs that are not directly attributable costs and therefore must be expensed in the income statement include<br />

• Costs of opening a new facility (often referred to as preoperative expenses)<br />

• Costs of introducing a new product or service<br />

• Advertising and promotional costs<br />

• Costs of conducting business in a new location or with a new class of customer<br />

• Training costs<br />

• Administration and other general overheads<br />

• Costs incurred while an asset, capable of being used as intended, is yet to be brought into use, is left idle, or is operating at below full capacity<br />

• Initial operating losses<br />

• Costs of relocating or reorganizing part or all of an entity’s operations<br />

This case study is concerned with directly attributable costs.<br />

Facts<br />

CASE STUDY 2<br />

Extravagant Inc. is installing a new plant at its production facility. It has incurred these costs:<br />

1. Cost of the plant (cost per supplier’s invoice plus taxes) $2,500,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!