22.03.2013 Views

Your document headline

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Required<br />

Value of biological asset at cost 12/31/X8 600<br />

Fair valuation surplus on initial recognition at fair value 12/31/X8 700<br />

Change in fair value to 12/31/X9 due to growth and price fluctuations 100<br />

Decrease in fair value due to harvest 90<br />

Show how these values would be incorporated into the financial statements at December 31, 20X9.<br />

Solution<br />

Extract from “Statement of Financial Position” at December 31, 20X9:<br />

Biological assets 600<br />

Fair valuation (included in profit or loss year ended 12/31/X8) 700<br />

Carrying value 1/1/20X9 1,300<br />

Change in fair value 100<br />

Decrease due to harvest (90)<br />

Carrying value at December 31, 20X9 1,310<br />

Extract from “Statement of Comprehensive Income” for year ended December 31, 20X9:<br />

Biological assets change in fair value 100<br />

Decrease due to harvest (90)<br />

Net gain 10<br />

PRACTICAL INSIGHT<br />

Stora Enso Oyj, a Finnish entity, applied IAS 41 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The entity is a producer of timber and<br />

timber products. It previously classified its forests as land within noncurrent assets and valued them at cost. Following the adoption of IAS 41, the entity<br />

reclassified the forests as biological assets and measured them at fair value. The effect was to increase the carrying value of the forests from €706 million to<br />

€1,562 million.<br />

FAIR VALUE RELIABILITY<br />

IAS 41 presumes that fair value can be measured reliably for a biological asset. However, it is possible that this presumption can be rebutted for a biological asset<br />

that, when it is first recognized, does not have a quoted market price in an active market and for which other valuation methods are clearly inappropriate or<br />

unworkable. In this case, the asset is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. All the other biological assets of the entity still must be<br />

measured at fair value. If circumstances do change and fair value becomes reliably measurable, then the entity must switch its valuation method to fair value less pointof-sale<br />

costs.<br />

If a noncurrent biological asset meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or is included in a disposal group in accordance with IFRS 5, then it is presumed<br />

that fair value can be measured reliably.<br />

In determining cost, depreciation, and impairment losses, the entity should use IAS 2, IAS 16, and IAS 36.<br />

$m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!